Skip to main content
Log in

Preliminary Molecular Phylogenetic Studies in Pachyanthus (Miconieae, Melastomataceae)

  • Published:
The Botanical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pachyanthus (Melastomataceae: Miconieae) is traditionally circumscribed as a group of 20 species of Caribbean shrubs, mostly local Cuban endemics. However, the exact number of species is unknown because generic delimitations are still unclear for most genera of Miconieae. To test the monophyly of Pachyanthus, we produced a molecular phylogeny using nrITS and plastid trnS-G sequence data for 38 taxa of Miconieae in the genera Pachyanthus, Calycogonium, Tetrazygia, and Miconia. A species of Graffenrieda, a member of the sister group, Merianieae, was used as an outgroup. In the single-gene and combined analyses Pachyanthus is never recovered as a monophyletic group in any of its traditional circumscriptions. However, it is possible to distinguish a clade, Pachyanthus s.s., which is characterized by ovate to obovate petals that are conspicuously unguiculate; calyx lobes connate before anthesis, that separate into sepal-like segments; straight, ovate to oblong, yellow anthers without connective appendages or, if present, then inconspicuous, anthers dehiscing by small apical pores, and fruits with numerous seeds, 1–2 mm long, obpyramidal, with a smooth testa. The remaining species traditionally included in Pachyanthus do not have any of these features. They do not form a single monophyletic group, but instead are scattered across several clades, which also contain species of Calycogonium, Miconia, and Tetrazygia. Additional detailed molecular and morphological studies are needed in the Miconieae to ascertain whether these clades should be treated as new genera or recircumscribed as part of currently recognized genera in the Caribbean region, such as Calycogonium and Tetrazygia.

Resumen

Pachyanthus (Melastomataceae: Miconieae) ha sido reconocido tradicionalmente como un grupo de unas 20 especies de arbustos caribeños, mayormente endémicos locales de Cuba. Sin embargo, el número exacto de especies es aun desconocido porque las delimitaciones genéricas de la mayoría de los géneros en Miconieae son aun dudosas. Para probar la monofilia de Pachyanthus, se realizó un análisis filogenético molecular con las secuencias de nrITS y de trnS-G del cloroplasto de 38 taxones de Miconieae pertenecientes a los géneros Pachyanthus, Calycogonium, Tetrazygia y Miconia. Como grupo externo se utilizó una especie de Graffenrieda, perteneciente a la tribu hermana Merianeae. En ninguno de los análisis de cada gen por separado, o en el análisis combinado se resuelve Pachyanthus como grupo monofilético como tradicionalmente se ha definido. Sin embargo es posible distinguir un grupo, Pachyanthus s.s., que se caracteriza por poseer pétalos ovados a obovados, conspicuamente unguiculados, lóbulos del cáliz fusionados antes de la antesis, pero que se separan en segmentos a manera de sépalos, anteras ovadas a oblongas, rectas, amarillas, sin apéndices en el conectivo o, si presentes, inconspicuos, dehiscencia de las anteras por un poro apical pequeño, y numerosas semillas de solo 1–2 mm de longitud, obpiramidales, con una testa lisa. Las restantes especies tradicionalmente ubicadas en Pachyanthus no poseen ninguna de esas características. Estas otras especies no forman un grupo monofilético, por el contrario se ubican por varios grupos, que también incluyen especies de Calycogonium, Miconia, y Tetrazygia. Son necesarios nuevos estudios moleculares y morfológicos más detallados, en la tribu Miconieae, para determinar si estos grupos deben ser tratados como nuevos géneros o redefinirlos como parte de otros géneros ya reconocidos del Caribe, tales como Calycogonium y Tetrazygia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Adams. C. D. 1972. Flowering plants of Jamaica. Robert MacLehose & Co., University Press, Glasgow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bécquer-Granados E. R. 2007. Tetrazygia decorticans (Miconieae, Melastomataceae), a new species from Cuba. Wildenowia 37: 313–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borhidi, A. 1983. New names and new species in the flora of Cuba and Antilles. III. Acta Bot. Hung. 29: 181–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1985. Phytogeographic survey of Cuba. I. The phytogeographic characteristics and evolution of the flora of Cuba. Acta Bot. Hung. 31: 3–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clausing, G., K. Meyer & S. S. Renner. 2000. Correlations among fruit traits and evolution of different fruit within the Melastomataceae. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 133: 303–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clausing, G., Renner S.S. 2001. Molecular phylogenetics of Melastomataceae and memecylaceae: Implications for character evolution. Amer. J. Bot. 88: 486–498.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cogniaux, A. 1891. Melastomataceae. In: A. & C. de Candolle, eds. Monographiae phanerogamarum 7. Masson, Paris.

  • Doyle, J. J. & J. L. Doyle. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem. Bull. 19: 11–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleason, H. A. 1932. A synopsis of the Melastomataceae of British Guiana. Brittonia 1: 127–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goloboff, P. 1993. Nona. Software and Documentation by the Author, Tucuman, Argentina.

  • Grisebach, A. H. R. 1866. Catalogus plantarum cubensium. Wihelm Engelmann, Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmgren, P. K. & N. H. Holmgren. 1998 Index Herbariorum. New York Botanical Garden. http://sciweb.nybg.org/science2/IndexHerbariorum.asp. (continuously updated).

  • Howard, R. A. 1989. Flora of the Lesser Antilles. Vol. 5. Dicotyledoneae. Part. 2. Arnold Arboretum, Harvard University, Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judd, W. S. 1986. Taxonomic studies in the Miconieae (Melastomataceae). I. Variation in inflorescence position. Brittonia 38: 150–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1989. Taxonomic studies in the Miconieae (Melastomataceae). III. Cladistic analysis of axillary-flowered taxa. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 76: 476–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——— & J. D. Skean. 1991. Taxonomic studies in the Miconieae (Melastomataceae). IV. Generic realignments among terminal-flowered taxa. Bull. Fl. Mus. Nat. Hist., Biol. Sci. 36: 25–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———, W. S., C. S. Campbell, E. A. Kellogg, P. F. Stevens, & M. J. Donoghue. 2002. Plant Systematics: A Phylogenetic Approach, ed. 2. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liogier, A. H. [= Hno. Alain]. 1957. Melastomataceae. In Flora de Cuba, vol. 4, by Hno. León and Hno. Alain. Contr Ocas Mus Nat Colegio “De La Salle” 10: 1–556.

  • Liogier, A. H. 2000. Melastomataceae. In Flora de la Española. IX. Jardín Botánico Nacional Dr. Rafael Ma. Moscoso, Editora Corripio, C. por A., Santo Dopmingo, Dominican Republic.

  • Macbride, J. F. 1941. Flora of Peru (Melastomataceae). Fieldiana, Bot. 13: 249–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michelangeli, F. A. 2000. A cladistic analysis of the genus Tococa (Melastomataceae) based on morphological data. Syst. Bot. 25: 211–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———, D. S. Penneys, J. Giza, D. Soltis, M. H. Hils & J. D. Skean, Jr. 2004. A preliminary phylogeny of the tribe Miconieae (Melastomataceae) based on nrITS sequence data and its implications on inflorescence position. Taxon 53: 279–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morales, M. E. & F. González. 2005. Redescubrimiento de Chalybea Naudin e implicaciones en la delimitación genérica de Huilaea Wurdack (Melastomataceae). Rev. Acad. Colomb. Cienc. 29(111):171–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Naudin, C. 1851. Melastomacearum. Ann. Sci. Nat. Bot. et Bio. Vég. sèr. 3, 16: 83–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nixon, K. C. 1999–2002. WinClada. Software and Documentation by the author, Ithaca, NY

  • Rambout, A. 1996. Se–Al: Sequence Alignment editor, v2.0a11. University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. http://evolve.zoo.ox.ac.uk/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renner, S. S. 1993. Phylogeny and classification of Melastomataceae and Memecylaceae. Nord. J. Bot. 13: 519–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richard, A. 1845. Fanerogamia ó plantas vasculares. In Sagra, R. de la, Historia física, política y natural de la Isla de Cuba. Parte 2. Historia Natural, Vol: 10. Paris.

  • Shaw, J., E. B. Lickey, J. T. Beck, S. B. Farmer, W. Liu, J. Miller, K. C. Siripun, C. T. Winder, E. E. Schilling & R. L. Small. 2005. The tortoise and the hare II: relative utility of 21 noncoding chloroplast DNA sequences for phylogenetic analysis. Amer. J. Bot. 92: 142–166.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Y., D. Z. Skinner, G. H. Liang & S. H. Hulbert. 1994. Phylogenetic analysis of Sorghum and related taxa using internal transcribed spacer of nuclear ribosomal DNA. Theor. Appl. Genet. 89: 26–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. D., Gibson, T. J., Plewniak, F., Jeanmougin, F., & Higgins, D. G. 1997. The CLUSTAL X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 25: 4876–4882.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Urban, I. 1924. Sertum antillanum. xix. Repert. Spec. Nov. Regni Veg. 19: 298–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1926. Sertum antillanum. xxvi. Repert. Spec. Nov. Regni Veg. 22: 222–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1927. Plantae haitienses novae vel rariores IV. a cl. E. L. Ekman 1924–26 lectae. Ark. Bot. 21A(5)

  • Wurdack, J. J. 1972. Certamen Melastomataceis XVIII. Phytologia 22: 399–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1973. Melastomataceae. In T. Lasser (ed.). Flora de Venezuela. No. 8. Instituto Botanico, Ministerio de Agricultura y Cria, Caracas.

  • ———. 1980. Melastomataceae. In G. Harling & B. Sparre, eds. Flora of Ecuador. Ni. 13. Univ. Göteborg & Riksmuseum, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1988. Certamen Melastomataceis XXXVIII. Phytologia 64: 293–301.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the staff of the herbarium of the Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, especially W. Mark Whitten, Norris Williams, and Kent Perkins. Thanks also to Karen L. Kelley and Lynda Schneider from the Electron Microscopy Core Laboratory at the University of Florida. We also thank Javier Francisco Ortega and Eugenio Santiago for organizing the Symposium “Evolución en las Antillas: la Perspectiva Molecular” at the IX Latin American Botanical Congress in Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic in June 2006, where this research was originally presented. A grant from the International Association of Plant Taxonomy (IAPT) supported, in part, the research of the first author. The National Science Foundation funded portions of this research through grants WJ (DEB-0515636) and FAM (DEB-0515665).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eldis R. Bécquer-Granados.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

  Taxa used for Molecular Phylogenetic Study

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bécquer-Granados, E.R., Neubig, K.M., Judd, W.S. et al. Preliminary Molecular Phylogenetic Studies in Pachyanthus (Miconieae, Melastomataceae). Bot. Rev 74, 37–52 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12229-008-9010-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12229-008-9010-z

Keywords

Navigation