, Volume 70, Issue 1, pp 150–154 | Cite as

On embryo polarity, polycotyly, and the homology test of conjunction: A reply to Kuijt´s (2017) critique


Literature cited

  1. Eichler, A. W. 1868. Loranthaceae. Pp. 156–198. In: C. F. P. von Martius (ed.). Flora Brasiliensis 3(1). Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig.Google Scholar
  2. Engler, A. & K. Krause. 1935. Loranthaceae. Pp. 98–203. In: A. Engler & K. Prantl (eds.). Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, 2 Aufl. 16b. Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig.Google Scholar
  3. González, F. & N. Pabón-Mora. 2017. On the supposed polycotyledony and lack of endosperm in Psittacanthus (Loranthaceae). Brittonia 69: 176–185.Google Scholar
  4. Johansen, D. A. 1950. Plant embryology. Embryogeny of the Spermatophyta. Waltham, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  5. Johri, B. M. & S. P. Bhatnagar. 1972. Loranthaceae. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, New Delhi.Google Scholar
  6. Johri, B. M., J. S. Agrawal & S. Garg. 1957. Morphological and embryological studies in the family Loranthaceae. I. Helicanthes elastica (Desr.) Dans. Phytomorphology 7: 336–354.Google Scholar
  7. Kuijt, J. 1967. On the structure and origin of the seedling of Psittacanthus schiedeanus (Loranthaceae). Canadian Journal of Botany 45: 1497–1505.Google Scholar
  8. ———. 1970. Seedling establishment in Psittacanthus (Loranthaceae). Canadian Journal of Botany 48: 705–711.Google Scholar
  9. ———. 1971. Notes on the seedling and early primary haustorium of Struthanthus quercicola (Loranthaceae). Acta Botanica Neerlandica 20: 467–474.Google Scholar
  10. ———. 1973. Further evidence of the systematic position of Psittacanthus sonorae (Loranthaceae). Madroño 22: 177–185.Google Scholar
  11. ———. 1982. Seedling morphology and its systematic significance in Loranthaceae of the New World, with supplementary comments on Eremolepidaceae. Botanische Jahrbucher für Systematik, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie 103: 305–342.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 2003. Two new South American species of Struthanthus (Loranthaceae) posing a challenge to circumscription of neotropical genera. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 142: 469–474.Google Scholar
  13. ———. 2009. Monograph of Psittacanthus (Loranthaceae). Systematic Botany Monographs 86: 1–361.Google Scholar
  14. ———. 2015. Santalales. Pp. 1–189. In: J. Kuijt & B. Hansen (eds.). The families and genera of vascular plants, vol. 12, Flowering plants: Eudicots; Santalales, Balanophorales. Springer, Cham, Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, London.Google Scholar
  15. ———. 2017. A rebuttal to a recent article by González and Pabón-Mora (2017) claiming the absence of polycotyly and the presence of endosperm in Psittacanthus (Loranthaceae). Brittonia (this issue).Google Scholar
  16. Patterson, C. 1982. Morphological characters and homology. Pp. 21–74. In: K. A. Joysey & A. E. Friday (eds.). Problems of phylogenetic reconstruction. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Botanical Garden 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Facultad de Ciencias, Instituto de Ciencias NaturalesUniversidad Nacional de ColombiaSede BogotáColombia
  2. 2.Instituto de BiologíaUniversidad de AntioquiaMedellínColombia

Personalised recommendations