Advertisement

Brittonia

, Volume 70, Issue 1, pp 15–24 | Cite as

Phenetic and cladistic studies help clarify species assemblages in Passiflora section Dysosmia (Passifloraceae)

  • Harlan T. Svoboda
  • Harvey E. BallardJr
Article

Abstract

One of the most enigmatic and unusual groups in the passionflower genus, Passiflora section Dysosmia (Passifloraceae), stands out as a group that is notoriously taxonomically complicated. Phenetic and cladistic analyses of Dysosmia were carried out with representatives from all 21 species currently recognized in the section, in order to delineate morphological groups above the species level. The study was based mainly on vegetative morphological characters and included principal coordinates, non-metric multidimensional scaling, cluster, and cladistic analyses. Results from each analysis reveals that three major species assemblages exist within Dysosmia, corresponding largely to vegetative pubescence and fruit color. The results presented here set the stage for future systematic and phylogenetic studies in Passiflora sect. Dysosmia.

Keywords

Cluster NMDS ordination passionflowers PCoA systematics 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper is part of the doctoral dissertation of the first author. The project was supported in part by an Ohio University Graduate Student Senate Original Works Grant awarded to HTS. We are grateful to the directors of the MO, NY, and US herbaria for kindly providing access to their collections and for loans of specimens, as well as three anonymous reviewers who helped improve this manuscript. We further extend our thanks to John MacDougal for creative insights and guidance throughout the project.

Supplementary material

12228_2017_9495_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (51 kb)
ESM 1 (XLSX 50 kb)
12228_2017_9495_MOESM2_ESM.eps (708 kb)
ESM 2 (EPS 708 kb)

Literature Cited

  1. Feuillet, C. 2007. Folia taxonomica 1. Validation of two taxa from northern South America. Journal of the Botanical Research Institute of Texas 1: 143–144.Google Scholar
  2. Feuillet, C. & J. M. MacDougal. 2003 [2014]. A new infrageneric classification of Passiflora L. (Passifloraceae). Passiflora: The Journal and Newsletter of the Passiflora Society International 13(2): 34–38.Google Scholar
  3. Feuillet, C. & J. M. MacDougal. 2006. Passifloraceae. In: K. Kubiitzki (ed.), The families and genera of vascular plants, vol. IX: 270–281. Springer, New York City.Google Scholar
  4. Givnish, T. J., K. J. Sytsma, J. F. Smith & W. J. Hahn. 1995. Molecular evolution, adaptive radiation, and geographic speciation in Cyanea (Campanulaceae, Lobelioideae). Pp. 288–337. In: W. L. Wagner & V. A. Funk (eds.), Hawaiian biogeography: Evolution on a hot spot archipelago. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  5. Gower, J. C. 1966. Some distance properties of latent root and vector methods used in multivariate analysis. Biometrika 53: 325–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hammer, Ø., D. A. T. Harper & P. D. Ryan. 2001. PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4(1). Downloadable from: https://folk.uio.no/ohammer/past
  7. Killip, E. P. 1938. The American species of Passifloraceae. Publications of the Field Museum of Natural History, Botanical Series 19. Field Museum Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  8. Krosnick, S. E., K. E. Porter-Utley, J. M. MacDougal, P. M. Jørgensen & L. A. McDade. 2013. New insights into the evolution of Passiflora subgenus Decaloba (Passifloraceae): Phylogenetic relationships and morphological synapomorphies. Systematic Botany 38: 692–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Masters, M. T. 1871. Contributions to the natural history of the Passifloraceae. Transactions of the Linnean Society of London 27: 593–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Miller, R. J., T. Mione, H.-L. Phan & R. G. Olmstead. 2011. Color by numbers: Nuclear gene phylogeny of Jaltomata (Solanaceae), sister genus to Solanum, supports three clades differing in fruit color. Systematic Botany 36: 153–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Rambaut, A. 2014. FigTree. (Downloadable from: http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/).
  12. Schneider, C. A., W. S. Rasband & K. W. Eliceiri. 2012. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nature Methods 9: 671–675.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Svoboda, H. T., J. M. MacDougal & H. E. Ballard. 2016. Typifications and nomenclatural notes in Passiflora section Dysosmia (Passifloraceae). Phytotaxa 288: 101–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Swofford, D. L. 2002. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Downloadable from: http://paup.sc.fsu.edu
  15. Vanderplank, J. 2013 [2014]. A revision of Passiflora section Dysosmia. Curtis’s Botanical Magazine 30: 317–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Botanical Garden 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental and Plant BiologyOhio UniversityAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations