Brittonia

, Volume 64, Issue 3, pp 305–317 | Cite as

New synonymies for Ruellia (Acanthaceae) of Costa Rica and notes on other neotropical species

Article

Abstract

As part of our study of the Acanthaceae of Costa Rica and from a phylogenetic study of Ruellia as a whole, we place R. barbillana and R. metallica in synonymy with R. terminalis. We discuss species limits of R. terminalis and provide a key that distinguishes it from close relatives including R. grantii, R. oaxacana, and R. phyllocalyx. Ruellia puri is put into synonymy with R. jussieuoides, and R. standleyi is synonymized with R. ochroleuca. Disjunct distributions characterize R. terminalis, R. jussieuoides, and R. ochroleuca, although this pattern is most extreme in R. ochroleuca. Phylogenetic analysis of DNA sequence data lends support to our synonymy decisions. New lectotypifications are provided for Arrhostoxylum achimeniflorum, Dipteracanthus puri, Dipteracanthus puri β angustifolius, Dipteracanthus puri γ gymnocladus, Lychniothyrsus ochroleucus, and Otacanthus pearcei.

Key words

Disjunct distribution Mata Atlântica Ruellieae systematics taxonomy 

Literature Cited

  1. Bremekamp, C. E. B. 1948. Acanthaceae. In: B. Maguire (ed.), Plant explorations in Guiana in 1944, chiefly to the Tafelberg and the Kaieteur Plateau-VI. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 75: 667–671.Google Scholar
  2. Daniel, T. F. 2008. Acanthaceae. In: O. Hokche, P. E. Berry & O. Huber. Nuevo catálogo de la flora vascular de Venezuela. Fundación Instituto Botánico de Venezuela Dr. Tobias Lasser, Caracas, Venezuela.Google Scholar
  3. Ezcurra, C. 1993. Systematics of Ruellia (Acanthaceae) in southern South America. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 80: 787–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Funk, V. A., T. H. Hollowell, P. E. Berry, C. L. Kelloff & S. N. Alexander. 2007. Checklist of the plants of the Guiana Shield (Venezuela: Amazonas, Bolívar, Delta Amacuro; Guyana, Surinam, French Guiana). Contributions from the United States National Herbarium 55: 1–584.Google Scholar
  5. Hammel, B. E., M. H. Grayum, C. Herrera & N. Zamora. 2004. Manual de plantas de Costa Rica. Volumen I. Introducción. Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis, Missouri.Google Scholar
  6. Huelsenbeck, J. P. & F. Ronquist. 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17: 754–755.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Leonard, E. C. 1941. New Acanthaceae from Guatemala. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences 31: 96–105.Google Scholar
  8. Lindau, G. 1895. Acanthaceae. Pp. 274–354. In: A. Engler and H. Prantl (eds.), Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, Vol. 4. W. Engelmann, Leipzig, Germany.Google Scholar
  9. Link, H. F. 1822. Acanthaceae. Pp. 132–134. In: G. Reimer, ed. Enumeratio plantarum horti regii botanici Berolinensis. Pars II. Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
  10. Maddison, D. R. & W. P. Maddison. 2003. MacClade: an analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Version 4.06. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  11. Martius, K. F. P. v. 1847. Flora Brasiliensis, enumeratio plantarum in Brasilia hactenus detectarum: quas suis aliorumque botanicorum studiis descriptas et methodo naturali digestas partim icone, Vol. 9. R. Oldenbourg, Munich and Leipzig.Google Scholar
  12. McDade, L. A. & E. A. Tripp. 2007. Synopsis of Costa Rica Ruellia L. (Acanthaceae): New species, taxonomic concepts, a country record, range extensions, and identification aids to the 22 species known from the country. Brittonia 59: 199–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. ———, T. F. Daniel & C. A. Kiel. 2008. Toward a comprehensive understanding of phylogenetic relationships among lineages of Acanthaceae s.l. (Lamiales). American Journal of Botany 95: 1136–1152.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nees, C. G. 1847. Acanthaceae. Pp. 46–519. In: A. P. De Candolle (ed.), Prodromus Systematis Naturalis. Regni Vegetabilis. Vol. 11. Treuttel and Wurtz: Paris.Google Scholar
  15. Posada, D. & K. A. Crandall. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817–818.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Shimodaira, H. & M. Hasegawa. 1999. Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Molecular Biology and Evolution 16: 1113–1116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Stoms, D. M., K. M. Chomitz & F. W. Davis. 2004. TAMARIN: a landscape framework for evaluating economic incentives for rainforest restoration. Landscape and Urban Planning 68: 95–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Swofford, D. L. 2002. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  19. Tripp, E. A. 2007. Evolutionary relationships within the species-rich genus Ruellia (Acanthaceae). Systematic Botany 32: 630–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. ———. 2010. Taxonomic revision of Ruellia section Chiropterophila (Acanthaceae): a lineage of rare and endemic species from Mexico. Systematic Botany 35: 629–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. ——— & P. S. Manos. 2008. Is floral specialization an evolutionary dead-end? Pollination system evolution in Ruellia (Acanthaceae). Evolution 62: 1712–1737.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. –––––, T. F. Daniel, J. C. Lendemer & L. A. McDade. 2009. New molecular and morphological insights prompt transfer of Blechum to Ruellia (Acanthaceae). Taxon 58: 893–906.Google Scholar
  23. Wasshausen, D. C. 1999. Acanthaceae. Pp. 191–199, 953. In: P. M. Jørgensen & S. León-Yánez (eds.), Catalogue of the vascular plants of Ecuador. Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis, Missouri.Google Scholar
  24. Zwickl, D. J. 2006. Genetic algorithm approaches for the phylogenetic analysis of large biological sequence datasets under the maximum likelihood criterion. Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Botanical Garden 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Rancho Santa Ana Botanic GardenClaremontUSA

Personalised recommendations