Skip to main content
Log in

Which family? — morphological and phylogenetic analyses of the enigmatic genus Numaeacampa (Campanulaceae)

  • Published:
Kew Bulletin Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The monospecific genus Numaeacampa Gagnep. has been considered to be closely related to Codonopsis Wall. and Campanumoea Blume (Campanulaceae), treated as a synonym of Codonopsis, or excluded from the Campanulaceae due to its unusual features for that family (10-lobed calyx, apically poricidal anthers, stellate corolla). Morphological study and molecular phylogenetic analyses clearly show that Numaeacampa kerrii is misplaced in the Campanulaceae, and is actually Lycianthes lysimachioides (Wall.) Bitter (Solanaceae). As a result, the names Numaeacampa and Numaeacampa kerrii are here reduced to synonyms of Lycianthes (Dunal) Hassl. and Lycianthes lysimachioides respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (2016). An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 181: 1 – 20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antonelli, A. (2008). Higher level phylogeny and evolutionary trends in Campanulaceae subfam. Lobelioideae: Molecular signal overshadows morphology. Molec. Phylogenet. Evol. 46 (1): 1 – 18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bitter, F. A. G. (1919). Lycianthes. Die Gattung ~Lycianthes~. Abh. Naturwiss. Vereins Bremen. 24: 491 – 493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunal, M. F. (1852). In: A. P. de Candolle, Prodromus Systematis Naturalis Regni Vegetabilis 13 (1): 29. Treuttel & Wurrtz, Paris, Strasbourg, London.

  • Gagnepain, F. (1948). Genres nouveaux, especes nouvelles d’ Indochine. Bull. Soc. Bot. France. 95 (1): 26 – 34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, V. F. & Olmstead, R. G. (2003). Phylogenetics of tribe Anthocercideae (Solanaceae) based on ndhF and trnL/F sequence data. Syst. Bot. 28 (3): 609 – 615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassler, E. (1917). Annuaire Conserv. Jard. Bot. Genève. 20: 180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, D. Y., Wang, Q. & Pan, K. Y. (2015). A Monograph of Codonopsis and Allied Genera (Campanulaceae). Elsevier, Amsterdam.

  • Larkin, M. A., Blackshields, G., Brown, N. P., Chenna, R., McGettigan, P. A., McWilliam, H., Valentin, F., Wallace, I. M., Wilm, A., Lopez, R., Thompson, J. D., Gibson, T. J. & Higgins, D. G. (2007). Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23: 2947 – 2948.

  • Lammers, T. G. (2007). World checklist and bibliography of Campanulaceae. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.

  • Li, J. L., Wang, S., Yu, J., Wang, L. & Zhou, S. L. (2013). A Modified CTAB Protocol for Plant DNA Extraction. Chinese Bull. Bot. 48: 72 – 78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mabberley, D. J. (2008). Mabberley's Plant-Book: A Portable Dictionary of Plants, Their Classification and Uses. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

  • Nylander, J. A. A., Wilgenbusch, J. C., Warren, D. L. & Swofford, D. L. (2008). AWTY (are we there yet?): A system for graphical exploration of MCMC convergence in Bayesian phylogenetics. Bioinformatics. 24: 581 – 583.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rambaut, A. (2002). Se-Al Sequence Alignment Editor, version 2.0a11. Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford.

  • Ronquist, F. & Huelsenbeck, J. P. (2003). MrBayes version 3.0: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics. 19: 1572 – 1574.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swofford, D. L. (2002). PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4.0b10. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.

  • Takhtajan, A. L. (1997). Diversity and Classification of Flowering Plants. Columbia University Press, New York.

  • Thiers, B. [continuously updated]. Index Herbariorum: A global directory of public herbaria and associated staff. New York Botanical Garden's Virtual Herbarium. http://sweetgum.nybg.org/science/ih/.

  • Wallich, N. (1824). In: W. Roxburgh (ed. W. Carey), Flora Indica; or descriptions of Indian Plants 2: 257 – 258. Mission Press, Serampore.

  • Wang, Q., Zhou, S. L. & Hong, D. Y. (2013). Molecular phylogeny of the platycodonoid group (Campanulaceae s. str.) with special reference to the circumscription of Codonopsis. Taxon. 62 (3): 498 – 504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We greatly appreciate the help of Dr Florian Jabbour, the curator of the herbarium P, for supplying the meterial from the holotype of Numaeacampa kerrii. Thanks are due to the curators of the herbaria CDBI, G, KUN, MPU, PE and SZ for permission to examine specimens. Our sincere gratitude is due to Dr Gemma L. C. Bramley and Dr Mike Gilbert of Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew for their valuable suggestions and improving the English, and to Mr Xin-Tang MA for his excellent photo of Codonopsis javanica. This research was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 31200157, 31110103911, J1310002), and the National Science Infrastructure Platform Foundation of China (Grant No. 2013FY112100).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to De-Yuan Hong.

Appendix 1. The taxa and GenBank accessions for ndhF sequences.

Appendix 1. The taxa and GenBank accessions for ndhF sequences.

Campanula sp., L39387; Codonopsis lanceolata (Siebold & Zucc.) Trautv., AF130185; Cyananthus microphyllus Edgew., AF130186; Duboisia hopwoodii F. Muell., EU580876; Fallopia sachalinensis (F. Schmidt) Ronse Decr., JF831263; Legousia hybrida (L.) Delarbre, DQ356111; Lobelia cardinalis L., AF130187; Lycianthes jelskii (Zahlbr.) Bitter, DQ667563; Lycianthes lysimachioides (Wall.) Bitter, DQ667565; Lycianthes lysimachioides (Wall.) Bitter, KT588610 (generated in the present study, the specimen preserved in PE: China, Guizhou, Xishui, 28 August 2003, Wu 1331, PE01542494). Lycianthes lysimachioides (Wall.) Bitter, KT588611 (generated in the present study, the specimen preserved in PE: China, Hunan, Hengshan, 29 Sept. 2001, Hu 631, PE00633296); Lycianthes pilifera (Benth.) Bitter, DQ667571; Muehlenbeckia sp., JF831262 Numaeacampa kerrii Gagnep., KT588612 (generated in the present study, the specimen preserved in P: Laos, Pu-tat, Vien-chan, 21 April 1932, A. F. G. Kerr 21186, P00236810); Panderia pilosa Fisch. & C. A. Mey., HM630058; Physalis carpenteri Riddell ex Rydb., EU580926; Pratia purpurescens E. Wimm., DQ356107; Quincula lobata (Torr.) Raf., EU580936; Salsola webbii Moq., HM630077; Schizanthus grahamii Gillies, EU580939; Siphocampylus affinis (Mirb.) McVaugh; DQ356104; Trachelium caeruleum L., AF130184; Witheringia cuneata (Standl.) Hunz., EU126018.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Q., Xu, C., Pan, KY. et al. Which family? — morphological and phylogenetic analyses of the enigmatic genus Numaeacampa (Campanulaceae). Kew Bull 72, 27 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12225-017-9701-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12225-017-9701-x

Key Words

Navigation