Determinants of Piper (Piperaceae) climber composition in a lowland tropical rainforest in New Guinea

  • Aleš LisnerEmail author
  • Graham Kaina
  • Mentap Sisol
  • Pavel Fibich
  • Vojtěch Novotný
  • George D. Weiblen
  • Jan Lepš


Climbing plants form a substantial component of tropical forest diversity. Climbers are a diverse group comprising various ecological strategies dependent on tree support and are affected by biotic and abiotic forest conditions. In a lowland primary tropical rainforest in Papua New Guinea, we studied the distribution of root climbers from genus Piper in relation to topography (slope, convexity, altitude) and properties of vegetation and of individual host trees (basal area of trees, and host tree size, abundance and species identity). In total, 1,058 Piper climber individuals belonging to 8 species occupied 13.7% of tree trunks with a diameter at breast height (DBH) > 1 cm. All Piper species generally avoided similar habitat conditions – higher altitude, steeper slopes, more closed canopy layer and bigger total basal area of host vegetation. The preferences of Piper climbers for some tree species are primarily determined by properties of host trees, mainly their DBH. Therefore, the probability of Piper presence on a tree increased with individual host tree DBH. Piper species were more frequently found on rare than common tree species. However, this relationship might be also explained by their affinity for higher tree DBH. Our findings point to non-random association between climbers and their host trees, in a complicated interplay with local environmental conditions. These interactions have very probably consequences for forest vegetation dynamics and maintenance of diversity.


Climber abundance Host trees Spatial distribution Tropical forest Vines 



We gratefully acknowledge support of the Czech Science Foundation (GACR 16-18022S), the European Science Foundation (669609), the Center for Tropical Forest Science, the Wanang Conservation Area and the University of South Bohemia. We are also grateful to Kipiro Damas and Kenneth Molem for their help with the determination of Piper species. The research was conducted in compliance with the laws of Papua New Guinea.

Supplementary material

12224_2018_9334_MOESM1_ESM.docx (309 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 309 kb)


  1. Anderson-Teixeira KJ, Davies SJ, Bennett AC, Gonzalez-Akre EB, Muller-Landau HC, Joseph Wright S, Abu Salim K, Almeyda Zambrano AM, Alonso A, Baltzer JL, Basset Y, Bourg NA, Broadbent EN, Brockelman WY, Bunyavejchewin S, Burslem DFRP, Butt N, Cao M, Cardenas D, Chuyong GB, Clay K, Cordell S, Dattaraja HS, Deng X, Detto M, Du X, Duque A, Erikson DL, Ewango CEN, Fischer GA, Fletcher C, Foster RB, Giardina CP, Gilbert GS, Gunatilleke N, Gunatilleke S, Hao Z, Hargrove WW, Hart TB, Hau BCH, He F, Hoffman FM, Howe RW, Hubbell SP, Inman-Narahari FM, Jansen PA, Jiang M, Johnson DJ, Kanzaki M, Kassim AR, Kenfack D, Kibet S, Kinnaird MF, Korte L, Kral K, Kumar J, Larson AJ, Li Y, Li X, Liu S, Lum SKY, Lutz JA, Ma K, Maddalena DM, Makana JR, Malhi Y, Marthews T, Mat Serudin R, Mcmahon SM, McShea WJ, Memiaghe HR, Mi X, Mizuno T, Morecroft M, Myers JA, Novotny V, de Oliveira AA, Ong PS, Orwig DA, Ostertag R, den Ouden J, Parker GG, Phillips RP, Sack L, Sainge MN, Sang W, Sri-ngernyuang K, Sukumar R, Sun IF, Sungpalee W, Suresh HS, Tan S, Thomas SC, Thomas DW, Thompson J, Turner BL, Uriarte M, Valencia R, Vallejo MI, Vicentini A, Vrška T, Wang X, Wang X, Weiblen G, Wolf A, Xu H, Yap S, Zimmerman J (2015) CTFS-ForestGEO: A worldwide network monitoring forests in an era of global change. Global Change Biol 21:528–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baars R, Kelly D, Sparrow AD (1998). Liane distribution within native forest remnants in two regions of the South Island, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Ecology, 22:71–85Google Scholar
  3. Balfour D, Bond WJ (1993) Factors limiting climber distribution and abundance in a Southern African forest. J Ecol 81:93–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Statist Softw, 67:1–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burns KC, Dawson J (2005) Patterns in the diversity and distribution of epiphytes and vines in a New Zealand forest. Austral Ecol 30:883–891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buron (1998) Association of vines and trees in second-growth forest. NE Naturalist 5:359–362Google Scholar
  7. Campanello PI, Garibaldi JF, Gatti MG, Goldstein G (2007) Lianas in a subtropical Atlantic Forest: Host preference and tree growth. Forest Ecol Managem 242:250–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Campbell M, Laurance WF, Magrach A (2014) Ecological effects of lianas in fragmented forests. In Ecology of lianas. Wiley, pp 443–450Google Scholar
  9. Carrasco-Urra F, Gianoli E (2009) Abundance of climbing plants in a southern temperate rain forest: host tree characteristics or light availability? J Veg Sci 20:1155–1162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clark DB, Clark DA (1990) Distribution and effects on tree growth of lianas and woody hemiepiphytes in a Costa Rican tropical wet forest. J Trop Ecol 6:321–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. DeWalt SJ, Schnitzer SA, Chave J, Bongers F, Burnham RJ, Cai Z, Chuyong G, Clark DB, Ewango CEN, Gerwing JJ, Gortaire E, Hart T, Ibarra-Manríquez G, Ickes K, Kenfack D, Macía MJ, Makana JR, Martínez-Ramos M, Mascaro J, Moses S, Muller-Landau HC, Parren MPE, Parthasarathy N, Pérez-Salicrup DR, Putz FE, Romero-Saltos H, Thomas D (2010) Annual rainfall and seasonality predict pan-tropical patterns of liana density and basal area. Biotropica 42:309–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Durigon J, Durán SM, Gianoli E (2013) Global distribution of root climbers is positively associated with precipitation and negatively associated with seasonality. J Trop Ecol 29:357–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fleming TH (1981). Fecundity, fruiting pattern, and seed dispersal in Piper amalago (Piperaceae), a bat-dispersed tropical shrub. Oecologia 51:42–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fleming TH (2004). Dispersal ecology of neotropical Piper shrubs and treelets. In Piper: a model genus for studies of phytochemistry, ecology, and evolution. Springer, Boston, pp 58–77Google Scholar
  15. Garbin ML, Carrijo TT, Sansevero JBB, Sánchez-Tapia A, Scarano FR (2012) Subordinate, not dominant, woody species promote the diversity of climbing plants. Perspect Pl Ecol Evol Syst 14:257–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Garbin ML, Sánchez-Tapia A, Carrijo TT, Sansevero JBB, Scarano FR (2014) Functional traits behind the association between climbers and subordinate woody species. J Veg Sci 25:715–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gardner RO (2013) Piper (Piperaceae) in New Guinea: The climbing species. Blumea 57:275–294Google Scholar
  18. Gianoli E (2004) Evolution of a climbing habit promotes diversification in flowering plants. Proc Roy Soc Biol Sci Ser B 271:2011–2015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gianoli E, Saldaña A, Jiménez-Castillo M, Valladares F (2010) Distribution and abundance of vines along the light gradient in a southern temperate rain forest. J Veg Sci 21:66–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hegarty EE (1991) Vine-host interactions. In The biology of vines. pp 357–375Google Scholar
  21. Ingwell LL, Joseph Wright S, Becklund KK, Hubbell SP, Schnitzer SA (2010) The impact of lianas on 10 years of tree growth and mortality on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. J Ecol 98:879–887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jaramillo MA, Manos PS (2001) Phylogeny and patterns of floral diversity in the genus Piper (Piperaceae). Amer J Bot 88:706–716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jayakumar R, Nair KKN (2013) Diversity and distribution of vines in the tropical forests of Nilgiri Biosphere Reserve. India. Curr Sci 105:470–479Google Scholar
  24. Kusumoto B, Enoki T, Watanabe Y (2008) Community structure and topographic distribution of lianas in a watershed on Okinawa, south-western Japan. J Trop Ecol 24:675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ledo A, Schnitzer SA (2014) Disturbance and clonal reproduction determine liana distribution and maintain liana diversity in a tropical forest. Ecology 95:2169–2178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Leicht-Young SA, Pavlovic NB, Frohnapple KJ, Grundel R (2010) Liana habitat and host preferences in northern temperate forests. Forest Ecol Managem 260:1467–1477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Llorens AM, Leishman MR (2008) Climbing strategies determine light availability for both vines and associated structural hosts. Austral J Bot 56:527–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Magrach A, Rodríguez-Pérez J, Campbell M, Laurance WF (2014) Edge effects shape the spatial distribution of lianas and epiphytic ferns in Australian tropical rain forest fragments. Appl Veg Sci 17:754–764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Malizia A (2003) Host Tree preference of vascular epiphytes and climbers in a subtropical montane cloud forest of northwest Argentina. Selbyana 24:196–205Google Scholar
  30. McAlpine JR, Keig G, Falls R (1983) Climate of papua new guinea. CSIRO and Australian National University Press, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  31. Mori H, Kamijo T, Masaki T (2016) Liana distribution and community structure in an old-growth temperate forest: the relative importance of past disturbances, host trees, and microsite characteristics. Pl Ecol 217:1171–1182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Muoghalu JI, Okeesan OO (2005) Climber species composition, abundance and relationship with trees in a Nigerian secondary forest. Afr J Ecol 43:258–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nakagawa S (2004) A farewell to Bonferroni: The problems of low statistical power and publication bias. Behav Ecol 15:1044–1045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nesheim I, Økland RH (2007) Do vine species in neotropical forests see the forest or the trees? J Veg Sci 18:395–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Parmar VS, Jain SC, Bisht KS, Jain R, Taneja P, Jha A, Tyagi OD, Prasad AK, Wengel J, Olsen CE, Boll PM (1997) Phytochemistry of the genus Piper. Phytochemistry 46:597–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Phillips OL, Martínez RV, Mendoza AM, Baker TR, Vargas PN (2005) Large lianas as hyperdynamic elements of the tropical forest canopy. Ecology 86:1250–1258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Piiroinen T, Nyeko P, Roininen H (2014) Canopy openness in gaps determines the influence of herbaceous climbers and insect folivory on the survival of a tropical pioneer tree, Neoboutonia macrocalyx Pax. Afr J Ecol 52:41–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Putz FE (1984a) How trees avoid and shed lianas. Biotropica 16:19–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Putz FE (1984b) The natural history of lianas on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Ecology 65:1713–1724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Putz F E, Mooney HA (eds) (1991) The biology of vines. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  41. R Core Team (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  42. Schnitzer SA, Bongers F (2002) The ecology of lianas and their role in forests. Trends Ecol Evol 17:223–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schnitzer SA, Bongers F (2011) Increasing liana abundance and biomass in tropical forests: Emerging patterns and putative mechanisms. Ecol Letters 14:397–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schnitzer SA, Carson WP (2001) Treefall gaps and the maintenance of species diversity in a tropical forest. Ecology 82:913–919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schnitzer SA, Carson WP (2010) Lianas suppress tree regeneration and diversity in treefall gaps. Ecol Letters 13:849–857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schnitzer SA, Kuzee ME, Bongers F (2005) Disentangling above- and below-ground competition between lianas and trees in a tropical forest. J Ecol 93:1115–1125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sfair JC, Rochelle ALC, Rezende AA, Van Melis J, Burnham RJ, Weiser V de L, Martins FR (2016) Liana avoidance strategies in trees: Combined attributes increase efficiency. Trop Ecol 57:559–566Google Scholar
  48. Šmilauer P, Lepš J (2014) Multivariate analysis of ecological data using CANOCO 5. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  49. Sykes JM, Horrill D, Mountford MD (1983) Use of visual cover assessments as quantitative estimators of some British woodland taxa. J Ecol 71:437–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Talley SM, Setzer WN, Jackes BR (1996) Host associations of two adventitious-root-climbing vines in a North Queensland tropical rain forest. Biotropica 28:356–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Teketay D, Granstrom A (1997) Germination ecology of forest species from the highlands of Ethiopia. J Trop Ecol 13:805–831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. ter Braak C, Šmilauer P (2012) CANOCO reference manual and user’s guide: software for ordination (version 5.0). Microcomputer Power, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  53. Valladares F, Gianoli E, Saldaña A (2011) Climbing plants in a temperate rainforest understory: searching for high light or coping with deep shade? Ann Bot (Oxford) 108:231–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vincent JB, Henning B, Saulei S, Sosanika G, Weiblen GD (2015) Forest carbon in lowland Papua New Guinea: local variation and the importance of small trees. Austral Ecol 40:151–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Whigham D (1984) The influence of vines on the growth of Liquidambar styraciflua L. (sweetgum). Canad J Forest Res 14:37–39Google Scholar
  56. Wickham H (2016) ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  57. Yang SZ, Fan H, Li KW, Ko TY (2018). How the diversity, abundance, size and climbing mechanisms of woody lianas are related to biotic and abiotic factors in a subtropical secondary forest, Taiwan. Folia Geobot 53:77–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Yuan CM, Liu WY, Tang CQ, Li XS (2009) Species composition, diversity, and abundance of lianas in different secondary and primary forests in a subtropical mountainous area, SW China. Ecol Res 24:1361–1370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zhang H, Tao J, Wang L, Zuo J, Wang Y, He Z, Liu J, Guo Q (2011) Influences of herbaceous vines on community characteristics in pioneer succession stages. Acta Ecol Sin 31:186–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Botany, Faculty of ScienceUniversity of South BohemiaCeske BudejoviceCzech Republic
  2. 2.New Guinea Binatang Research CentreMadangPapua New Guinea
  3. 3.Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of SciencesInstitute of EntomologyCeske BudejoviceCzech Republic
  4. 4.Department of Plant BiologyUniversity of MinnesotaSt PaulUSA

Personalised recommendations