Skip to main content
Log in

β-glucosidase production by recombinant Pichia pastoris strain Y1433 under optimal feed profiles of fed-batch cultivation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Folia Microbiologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pichia pastoris, a methylotrophic yeast, is known to be an efficient host for heterologous proteins production. In this study, a recombinant P. pastoris Y11430 was found better for β-glucosidase activity in comparison with a wild type P. pastoris Y11430 strain, and thereby, subjected to methanol intermittent feed profiling for β-glucosidase production. The results showed that at 72 h of cultivation time, the cultures with 16.67% and 33.33% methanol feeding with constant rate could produce the total dry cell weight of 52.23 and 118.55 g/L, respectively, while the total mutant β-glucosidase activities were 1001.59 and 3259.82 units, respectively. The methanol feeding profile was kept at 33% with three methanol feeding strategies such as constant feed rate, linear feed rate, and exponential feed rate which were used in fed-batch fermentation. At 60 h of cultivation, the highest total mutant β-glucosidase activity was 2971.85 units for exponential feed rate culture. On the other hand, total mutant β-glucosidase activity of the constant feed rate culture and linear feed rate culture were 1682.25 and 1975.43 units, respectively. The kinetic parameters of exponential feed rate culture were specific growth rate on glycerol 0.228/h, specific growth of methanol 0.061/h, maximum total dry cell weight 196.73 g, yield coefficient biomass per methanol (\({Y_{x/m}}\)) 0.57 gcell/gMeOH, methanol consumption rate (\({Q_m}\)) 5.76 gMeOH/h, and enzyme productivity (\({Q_p}\)) 75.96 units/h. In conclusion, higher cell mass and β- glucosidase activity were produced under exponential feed rate than constant and linear feed rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

All the data has been declared.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Agro-Industry, Kasetsart University, Thailand. The authors also acknowledge the support of Associate Professor Prachumporn Kongsaree, Department of Biochemistry, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Sirirat Changming: investigation and writing-original draft. Prachumporn Kongsaree: resource person and supervision. Imrana Niaz Sultan: validation and review and editing the draft. Afrasiab Khan Tareen: formal analysis, conceptualization, and review and editing draft. Wirat Vanichsriratana: project administration and resources. Sarote Sirisansaneeyakul: supervision and formal analysis. Pramuk Parakulsuksatid: conceptualization, supervision, project administration, and resources.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pramuk Parakulsuksatid.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Changming, S., Kongsaree, P., Sultan, I.N. et al. β-glucosidase production by recombinant Pichia pastoris strain Y1433 under optimal feed profiles of fed-batch cultivation. Folia Microbiol 68, 245–256 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12223-022-01008-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12223-022-01008-w

Keywords

Navigation