Alwazeer D, Riondet C, Cachon R (2018) Comparison between fluorescent probe and ion-selective electrode methods for intracellular pH determination in Leuconostoc mesenteroides. Curr Microbiol 75:1493–1497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-018-1550-9
CAS
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Belguendouz T, Cachon R, Diviès C (1997) pH homeostasis and citric acid utilization: differences between Leuconostoc mesenteroides and Lactococcus lactis. Curr Microbiol 35:233–236
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Booth IR (1985) Regulation of cytoplasmic pH in bacteria. Microbiol Rev 49:359–378
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Bouix M, Ghorbal S (2015) Rapid assessment of Oenococcus oeni activity by measuring intracellular pH and membrane potential by flow cytometry, and its application to the more effective control of malolactic fermentation. Int J Food Microbiol 193:139–146
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Breeuwer P, Drocourt JL, Rombouts FM, Abee T (1996) A novel method for continuous determination of the intracellular pH in bacteria with the internally conjugated fluorescent probe 5 (and 6-) -carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:178–183
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Cachon R, Antérieux P, Diviès C (1998) The comparative behavior of Lactococcus lactis in free and immobilized culture processes. J Biotechnol 63:211–218
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Cook GM, Russell JB (1994) The effect of extracellular pH and lactic acid on pH homeostasis in Lactococcus lactis and Streptococcus bovis. Curr Microbiol 28:165–168
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Glaasker E, Konings WN, Poolman B (1996) The application of pH-sensitive fluorescent dyes in lactic acid bacteria reveals distinct extrusion systems for unmodified and conjugated dyes. Mol Membr Biol 13:173–181
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Hache C, Cachon R, Wache Y et al (1999) Influence of lactose-citrate co-metabolism on the differences of growth and energetics in Leuconostoc lactis, Leuconostoc mesenteroides ssp. mesenteroides and Leuconostoc mesenteroides ssp. cremoris. Syst Appl Microbiol 22:507–513
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Hansen G, Johansen CL, Marten G, Wilmes J, Jespersen L, Arneborg N (2016) Influence of extracellular pH on growth, viability, cell size, acidification activity, and intracellular pH of Lactococcus lactis in batch fermentations. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 100:5965–5976
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Hellingwerf KJ, van Hoorn P (1985) A polyvinylchloride-membrane based anion selective electrode for continuous registration of delta pH (interior alkaline) with salicylate as the indicator probe. J Biochem Biophys Methods 11:83–93
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Huang R, Pan M, Wan C, Shah NP, Tao X, Wei H (2016) Physiological and transcriptional responses and cross protection of Lactobacillus plantarum ZDY2013 under acid stress. J Dairy Sci 99:1002–1010. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-9993
CAS
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Kashket ER (1987) Bioenergetics of lactic acid bacteria: cytoplasmic pH and osmotolerance. FEMS Microbiol Rev 46:233–244
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Kashket ER (1985) The proton motive force in bacteria: a critical assessment of methods. Annu Rev Microbiol 39:219–242
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Kudo H, Sasaki Y (2019) Intracellular pH determination for the study of acid tolerance of lactic acid bacteria. In: Lactic Acid Bacteria. Humana Press, New York, pp 33–41
Google Scholar
Loubiere P, Salou P, Leroy MJ, Lindley ND, Pareilleux A (1992) Electrogenic malate uptake and improved growth energetics of the malolactic bacterium Leuconostoc oenos grown on glucose-malate mixtures. J Bacteriol 174:5302–5308
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randell RJ (1951) Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193:265–275
CAS
Google Scholar
Marty-Teysset C, Posthuma C, Lolkema JS, Schmitt P, Divies C, Konings WN (1996) Proton motive force generation by citrolactic fermentation in Leuconostoc mesenteroides. J Bacteriol 178:2178–2185
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
McDonald LC, Fleming HP, Hassan HM (1990) Acid tolerance of Leuconostoc mesenteroides and Lactobacillus plantarum. Appl Environ Microbiol 56:2120–2124
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Mercade M, Lindley ND, Loubiere P (2000) Metabolism of Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris MG 1363 in acid stress conditions. Int J Food Microbiol 55:161–165
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Molina-Gutierrez A, Stippl V, Delgado A, Gänzle MG, Vogel RF (2002) In situ determination of the intracellular pH of Lactococcus lactis and Lactobacillus plantarum during pressure treatment. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:4399–4406
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Nannen NL, Hutkins RW (1991) Proton-translocating adenosine triphosphatase activity in lactic acid bacteria. J Dairy Sci 74:747–751
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Padan E, Schuldiner S (1986) Intracellular pH regulation in bacterial cells. Methods Enzymol 125:337–352
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Parish ME, Higgins D (1988) Isolation and identification of lactic bacteria from samples of citrus molasses and unpasteurized orange juice. J Food Sci 53:645–646
Article
Google Scholar
Paulsen IT, Brown MH, Skurray RA (1996) Proton-dependent multidrug efflux systems. Microbiol Rev 60:575–608
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Rault A, Bouix M, Béal C (2009) Fermentation pH influences the physiological-state dynamics of Lactobacillus bulgaricus CFL1 during pH-controlled culture. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:4374–4381
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Rottenberg H (1979) The measurement of membrane potential and deltapH in cells, organelles, and vesicles. Methods Enzymol 55:547–569
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Rupprecht C, Wingen M, Potzkei J, Gensch T, Jaeger KE, Drepper T (2017) A novel FbFP-based biosensor toolbox for sensitive in vivo determination of intracellular pH. J Biotechnol 258:25–32
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Schäferling M (2016) Nanoparticle-based luminescent probes for intracellular sensing and imaging of pH. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 8:378–413
Article
Google Scholar
Setty OH, Hendler RW, Shrager RI (1983) Simultaneous measurements of proton motive force, delta pH, membrane potential, and H+/O ratios in intact Escherichia coli. Biophys J 43:371–381
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Tseng CP, Tsau JL, Montville TJ (1991) Bioenergetic consequences of catabolic shifts by Lactobacillus plantarum in response to shifts in environmental oxygen and pH in chemostat cultures. J Bacteriol 173:4411–4416
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Wouters PC, Glaasker E, Smelt JPPM (1998) Effects of high pressure on inactivation kinetics and events related to proton efflux in Lactobacillus plantarum. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:509–514
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Wu C, He G, Zhang J (2014) Physiological and proteomic analysis of Lactobacillus casei in response to acid adaptation. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 41:1533–1540
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Wu C, Zhang J, Du G, Chen J (2013) Aspartate protects Lactobacillus casei against acid stress. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 97:4083–4093
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Xu J, Koyanagi Y, Isogai E, Nakamura S (2019) Effects of fermentation products of the commensal bacterium Clostridium ramosum on motility, intracellular pH, and flagellar synthesis of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli. Arch Microbiol 201:841–846
CAS
Article
Google Scholar
Zhang J, Wu C, Du G, Chen J (2012) Enhanced acid tolerance in Lactobacillus casei by adaptive evolution and compared stress response during acid stress. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 17:283–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12257-011-0346-6
CAS
Article
Google Scholar