Effect of hyperbaric air on endotoxin from Bacteroides fragilis strains
- 112 Downloads
The aim of the project was to determine any effect of hyperbaric air on Bacteroides fragilis strains cultivated under hyperbaric conditions. Previously, it was hypothesized that there was a correlation between the presence of Bacteroides bacteria in patients preferring a meaty diet and cancer of the small intestine, and particularly of the large intestine and rectum. With respect to the fact that Bacteroides fragilis (BAFR) group are important producers of endotoxins, measurement and statistical evaluation of endotoxin production by individual strains of isolated Bacteroides species were used to compare bacteria isolated from various clinical samples from patients with colon and rectum cancer in comparison with strains isolated from other non-cancer diagnoses. Endotoxin production was proven by quantitative detection using the limulus amebocyte lysate (LAL) test in EU/mL. Production of endotoxins in these bacteria cultured under hyperbaric air conditions was higher than those strains cultured under normobaric anaerobic conditions. But these differences in endotoxin production were not statistically significant (t test with log-transformed data, p value = 0.0910). Based on a two-tier t test for lognormal data, it is possible to cautiously conclude that a statistically significant difference was found between endotoxin production by Bacteroides fragilis strains isolated from non-carcinoma diagnoses (strains (1–6) and strains isolated from colorectal carcinoma diagnoses (strains 7–8; Wilcoxon non-parametric test p = 0.0132; t test = 0.1110; t test with log-transformed data, p value = 0.0294).
This work could be accomplished thanks to the financial contribution granted for the SGS01/LF/2016 project of the specific university research of the Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava.
DCh: the author of the article and scenario of experiments and article writing; AK, PM: organization of experimental work in Faculty of Medicine of University of Ostrava; MH, IČ: suggestions and checking the manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
Additional informed consent was obtained from all individual patients included in the study article.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Bang FA (1956) Bacterial disease of Limulus polyphemus. Bull J Hopkins Hosp 98:325–330Google Scholar
- Chiu C-M et al (2014) Systematic analysis of the association between gut flora and obesity through high-throughput sequencing and bioinformatics approaches. BioMed Res Int 2014, Article ID 906168, 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/906168
- Chmelař D (2001) Gastrointestinal tract—source of endogenous anaerobic infections. Spr Klin Mikrobiol, SA/2001, Supl A-2001, pp 87–88Google Scholar
- Chmelař D, Hájek M, Janečková J, Vobejdová J, Martineková P, Kašíková A (2016) The effect of oxygen on endotoxin production in bacteria of the Bacteroides fragilis group isolated from patients with colorectal carcinoma. Epidemiol Mikrobiol Imunol 2:129–135Google Scholar
- Čižnár I (1982) Gram-negative bacteria toxins. Veda, Bratislava, pp 15–69Google Scholar
- Finegold SM, Orkin BA, Cataldo PA, Marcy SM et al (1986) Anaerobic infections. Year Book Medical Publishers, Chicago, pp 158–223Google Scholar
- Gee JM, Rocha ER, Smith CJ (2008) Examination of the contributions of DPS to the oxidative stress response and pathogenesis of the opportunistic pathogen, Bacteroides fragilis. The 9th Biennial Congress of the Anaerobe Society of Americas, 4. http://www.anaerobe.org/2008/ASA%202008%20Session%201.pdf
- Gibbon GR, MacFarlane GT (1994) Intestine bacteria and disease. Human health: the contribution of microorganisms. Springer, Berlin, pp 53–62Google Scholar
- Hardham JM et al (2008) Transfer of Bacteroides splanchnicus to Odoribacter gen. nov. as Odoribacter splanchnicus comb. nov., and description of Odoribacter denticanis sp. nov., isolated from the crevicular spaces of canine periodontitis patients. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 58:103–110CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Heyboer M, Milanova TN, Wojcik S et al (2014) CD34+/CD45-dim stem cell mobilization by hyperbaric oxygen—changes with oxygen dosage. Stem Cells Res 12(3):638–645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ser. 2014.02.005. PMC 4037447 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kozelská R (2006) Detection of endotoxins in pathogenic gram-negative bacteria. Bachelor thesis, Department of Investigation Methods and Medical Biology, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of Ostrava, pp 29–32Google Scholar
- Krásová Z, Matušek A, Chmelař D (1992) Hyperbaric oxygenation in the treatment of necrotizing fasciitis. Vnitr Lek 36(7):640–644Google Scholar
- Lewis CJ, Coby BA (2007) Oxidant production by APCs in response to glycoantigens. J Immunol 178:36–39Google Scholar
- Matušek A, Martínek L, Chmelař D, Krásová Z (1998) Fournier's gangrene. Rozhl Chir 1:24–26Google Scholar
- Morris JG (1991) Characteristics of anaerobic metabolism. In: Duerden BI, Drasar BS (eds) Anaerobes in human disease. Edward Arnold, London, pp 16–37Google Scholar
- Reott MA, Rocha ER, Parker AC, Smith CJ (2008) Thioredoxins in redox maintenance and survival during oxidative stress of Bacteroides fragilis. The 9th Biennial Congress of the Anaerobe Society of Americas: http://www.anaerobe.org/2008/ASA%202008%20Session%201.pdf
- Sakamoto M, Benno Y (2006) Reclassification of Bacteroides distasonis, Bacteroides goldsteinii and Bacteroides merdae as Parabacteroides distasonis gen. nov., comb. nov., Parabacteroides goldsteinii comb. nov. and Parabacteroides merdae comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 56:1599–1605CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Skovsen AP, Bonde J, Andersen JS, Jansen EC, Tvede M (2010) Necrotizing fasciitis. Ugeskr Llaeger 172:440–444Google Scholar