Abstract
Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTC) comprises a group of bacteria that have a high degree of genetic similarity. Two species in this group, Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium bovis, are the main cause of human and bovine tuberculosis, respectively. M. bovis has a broader host range that includes humans; thus, the differentiation of mycobacterium is of great importance for epidemiological and public health considerations and to optimize treatment. The current study aimed to evaluate primers and molecular markers described in the literature to differentiate M. bovis and M. tuberculosis by PCR. Primers JB21/22, frequently cited in scientific literature, presented in our study the highest number of errors to identify M. bovis or M. tuberculosis (73 %) and primers Mb.400, designed to flank region of difference 4 (RD4), were considered the most efficient (detected all M. bovis tested and did not detect any M. tuberculosis tested). Although also designed to flank RD4, primers Mb.115 misidentified eight samples due to primer design problems. The results showed that RD4 is the ideal region to differentiate M. bovis from other bacteria classified in MTC, but primer design should be considered carefully.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander KA, Laver PN, Michel AL, Williams M, van Helden PD, Warren RM, Gey van Pittius NC (2010) Novel Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex pathogen, M. mungi. Emerg Infect Dis 16(8):1296–1299
Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410
Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25:3389–3402
Araujo CP, Osorio ALAR, Jorge KSG, Ramos CAN, Filho AFS, Vidal CES, Roxo E, Nishibe C, Almeida NF, Fonseca Jr AA, Silva MR, Neto JDB, Cerqueira VD, Zumarraga MJ, Araujo FR (2014) Detection of Mycobacterium bovis in bovine and bubaline tissues using nested-PCR for TbD1. Plos One 9:e91023
Bakshi CS, Shah DH, Verma R, Singh RK, Malik M (2005) Rapid differentiation of Mycobacterium bovis and Mycobacterium tuberculosis based on a 12.7-kb fragment by a single tube multiplex-PCR. Vet Microbiol 109:211–216
Brasil (2006) Ministério da Agricultura Pecuária e Abastecimento. Programa Nacional de Controle e Erradicação da Brucelose e Tuberculose – PNCEBT. Brasil: MAPA/DAS/DAS, 184p. (Manual Técnico).
Brosch R, Philipp WJ, Stavropoulos E, Colston MJ, Cole ST, Gordon SV (1999) Genomic analysis reveals variation between Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv and the attenuated M. tuberculosis H37Ra strain. Infect Immun 67:5768–5774
Brosch R, Gordon SV, Marmiesse M, Brodin P, Buchrieser C, Eiglmeier K, Garnier T, Gutierrez C, Hewinson G, Kremer K, Parsons LM, Pym AS, Samper S, Van Soolingen D, Cole ST (2002) A new evolutionary scenario for the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99(6):3684–3689
Cardoso MA, Cardoso RF, Hirata RDC, Hirata MH, Leite CQF, Santos ACB, Siqueira VLD, Okano W, Rocha NS, Lonardoni MVC (2009) Direct detection of Mycobacterium bovis in bovine lymph nodes by PCR. Zoonoses Public Health 56:465–470
de Jong BC, Antonio M, Gagneux S (2010) Mycobacterium africanum—review of an important cause of human tuberculosis in West Africa. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 4:e744
de La Rua-Domenech R (2006) Human Mycobacterium bovis infection in the United Kingdom: incidence, risks, control measures and review of the zoonotic aspects of bovine tuberculosis. Tuberculosis 86:77–109
Di Pietrantonio T, Schurr E (2013) Host-pathogen specificity in tuberculosis. Adv Exp Med Biol 783:33–44
Figueiredo EES, Silvestre FG, Campos WN, Furlanetto LV, Medeiros L, Lilenbaum W, Fonseca LS, Silva JT, Paschoalin V (2009) Identification of Mycobacterium bovis isolates by a multiplex PCR. Braz J Microbiol 40:231–233
Fleischmann RD, Alland D, Eisen JA, Carpenter L, White O, Peterson J, Deboy R, Dodson R, Gwinn M, Haft D, Hickey E, Kolonay JF, Nelson WC, Umayam LA, Ermolaeva M, Salzberg SL, Delcher A, Utterback T, Weidman J, Khouri H, Gill J, Mikula A, Bishai W, Jacobs WR Jr, Venter JC, Fraser CM (2002) Whole-genome comparison of Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical and laboratory strains. J Bacteriol 184:5479–5490
Garnier T, Eiglmeier K, Camus JC, Medina N, Mansoor H, Pryor M, Duthoy S, Grondin S, Lacroix C, Monsempe C, Simon S, Harris B, Atkin R, Doggett J, Mayes R, Keating L, Wheeler PR, Parkhill J, Barrell BG, Cole ST, Gordon SV, Hewinson RG (2003) The complete genome sequence of Mycobacterium bovis. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100:7877–7882
Hall TA (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 41:95–98
Huard RC, Fabre M, de Haas P, Lazzarini LC, van Soolingen D, Cousins D, Ho JL (2006) Novel genetic polymorphisms that further delineate the phylogeny of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. J Bacteriol 188(12):4271–4287
Kraemer HC (1992) Evaluating medical tests. Sage, Newbury Park
Pinsky BA, Banaei N (2008) Multiplex real-time PCR assay for rapid identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex members to the species level. J Clin Microbiol 46:2241–2246
Rodriguez JG, Fissanoti JC, Del Portillo P, Patarroyo ME, Romano MI, Cataldi A (1999) Amplification of a 500-base-pair fragment from cultured isolates of Mycobacterium bovis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 37:2330–2332
Ruggiero AP, Ikuno AA, Ferreira VCA, Roxo E (2007) Tuberculose bovina: alternativas para o diagnóstico. Arq Inst Biol 74:55–65
Sakamoto SM, Telles MAS, Heinemann MB, Richtzenhain LJ, Roxo E, Vasconcellos AS, Ferreira Neto JS (1999) Detecção e identificação de Mycobacterium bovis pela reação em cadeia da polimerase. Arq Inst Biol 66:45–58
Sakamoto SM, Assis RA, Alencar AP, Mota PMPC, Lage AP (2008) Métodos auxiliares de diagnóstico da tuberculose bovina. Cad Téc Vet Zootec 59:43–68
Sechi LA, Duprè I, Leori G, Fadda G, Zanetti S (2000) Distribution of a specific 500-base-pair fragment in Mycobacterium bovis isolates from Sardinian cattle. J Clin Microbiol 38:3837–3839
Shah DH, Verma R, Bakshi CS, Singh RK (2002) A multiplex-PCR for the differentiation of Mycobacterium bovis and Mycobacterium tuberculosis. FEMS Microbiol Lett 214:39–43
Silva MR, Rocha AS, Costa RR, Alencar AP, Oliveira VM, Fonseca AA Jr, Sales ML, Issa MA, Soares Filho PM, Pereira OTV, Santos EC, Mendes RS, Ferreira AMJ, Mota PMPC, Suffys PN, Guimarães MDC (2013) Tuberculosis patients co-infected with Mycobacterium bovis and Mycobacterium tuberculosis in an urban area in Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 108:321–327
Smith NH, Kremer K, Inwald J, Dale J, Driscoll JR, Gordon SV, Van Soolingen D, Hewinson RG, Smith JM (2006) Ecotypes of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. J Theor Biol 239:220–225
Taylor GM, Worth DR, Palmer S, Jahans K, Hewinson RG (2007) Rapid detection of Mycobacterium bovis DNA in cattle lymph nodes with visible lesions using PCR. BMC Vet Res 3:12
Telenti A, Marchesi F, Balz M, Bally F, Böttger EC, Bodmer T (1993) Rapid identification of mycobacteria to the species level by polymerase chain reaction and restriction enzyme analysis. J Clin Microbiol 31:175–178
Untergasser A, Nijveen H, Rao X, Bisseling T, Geurts R, Leunissen JAM (2007) Primer3Plus, an enhanced web interface to Primer3. Nucleic Acids Res 35:W71–W74
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento, INCT-Pecuária and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq). APL and MBH thank the CNPq for the fellowships.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sales, M.L., Fonseca, A.A., Sales, É.B. et al. Evaluation of molecular markers for the diagnosis of Mycobacterium bovis . Folia Microbiol 59, 433–438 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12223-014-0317-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12223-014-0317-3