Skip to main content
Log in

Control and prediction of the course of brewery fermentations by gravimetric analysis

  • Papers
  • Published:
Folia Microbiologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A simple, fast and cheap test suitable for predicting the course of brewery fermentations based on mass analysis is described and its efficiency is evaluated. Compared to commonly used yeast vitality tests, this analysis takes into account wort composition and other factors that influence fermentation performance. It can be used to predict the shape of the fermentation curve in brewery fermentations and in research and development projects concerning yeast vitality, fermentation conditions and wort composition. It can also be a useful tool for homebrewers to control their fermentations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ADF:

apparent degree of fermentation

ASBC :

American Society of Brewing Chemists

AP:

acidification power

R&D:

research and development

References

  • Andres-Toro B., Giron-Sierra J.M., Fernandez-Blanco P., Lopez-Orozco J.A., Besada-Portas E.: Multiobjective optimization and multivariable control of the beer fermentation process with the use of evolutionary algorithms. J.Zhejiang Univ.Sci. 5, 378–389 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anger H.M., Steinfurth R.: New CO2 measuring instruments for brewery laboratories. Brauwelt Internat. 12, 348–351 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • ASBC Methods of Analysis, 2007 Edition. American Society of Brewing Chemists, St. Paul (USA) 2007.

  • Eide D.J., Clark S., Nair T.M., Gehl M., Gribskov M., Guerinot M.L., Harper J.F.: Characterization of the yeast ionome: a genome-wide analysis of nutrient mineral and trace element homeostasis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genome Biol. 6, R77 (2005); DOI: 10.1186/gb-2005-6-9-r77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heggart H., Margaritis A., Stewart R.J., Pilkington H., Sobczak J., Russell I.: Measurement of brewing yeast viability and vitality: a review of methods. Tech.Quart.-Master Brew.Assoc.Am. 37, 409–430 (2000).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Imai T., Nakajima I., Ohno T.: Development of a new method for evaluation of yeast vitality by measuring intracellular pH. J.Am. Soc.Brew.Chem. 52, 5–8 (1994).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Iserentant D., Geenens W., Verachtert H.: Titrated acidification power: a simple and sensitive method to measure yeast vitality and its relation to other vitality measurements. J.Am.Soc.Brew.Chem. 54, 110–114 (1996).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins C.L., Kennedy A.I., Hodgson J.A., Thurston P., Smart K.A.: Impact of serial repitching on lager brewing yeast quality. J.Am.Soc.Brew.Chem. 61, 1–9 (2003).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kara B.V., Simpson W.M., Hammond R.M.: Prediction of the fermentation performance of brewing yeast with the acidification power test. J.Inst.Brew. 94, 153–158 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Košín P., Šavel J., Kolouchová I., Brož A.: Yeast viability and vitality in brewery fermentation. (In Czech) Kvasný Prům. 53, 30–34 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodolo E.J., Cantrell I.C.: Yeast vitality — a holistic approach toward an integrated solution to predict yeast performance. J.Am.Soc. Brew.Chem. 65, 202–207 (2007).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu C., Van den Bergh L., Isenrentant D.: Prediction of yeast fermentation performance using the acidification power test, pp. 273–280 in Proc. 23rd Congr. Eur. Brew. Convention, Lisbon 1991.

  • MEBAK: Methodensammlung der Mitteleuropäischen Brautechnischen Analysenkommission (MEBAK). Brautechnische Analysenmethoden, Band 2, 3. Auflage. MEBAK, Freising-Weihenstephan (Germany) 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mochaba F.M., O’Connor-Cox E.S.C., Axcell B.C.: A novel and practical yeast vitality method based on magnesium ion release. J.Inst.Brew. 103, 99–102 (1997).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Myers A., Bourn J., Poole B.: Glucose-induced acidification in yeast cultures. J.Biol.Educ. 40, 38–42 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Novák J., Basařová G., Teixeira J.A., Vicente A.A.: Monitoring of brewing yeast propagation under aerobic and anaerobic conditions employing flow cytometry. J.Inst.Brew. 113, 249–255 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Novák J., Basařová G., Fiala J., Dostálek P.: Flow cytometry in study of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its practical application. (In Czech) Chem.Listy 102, 183–187 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • Opekarová M., Sigler K.: Acidification power: indicator of metabolic activity and autolytic changes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Folia Microbiol. 27, 395–403 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patino H., Edelen C., Miller J.: Alternative measures of yeast vitality: use of cumulative acidification power and conductance. J.Am. Soc.Brew.Chem. 51, 128–132 (1993).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Qain D.E.: Studies on the physiology — impact on fermentation performance and product quality. J.Inst.Brew. 95, 315–323 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues P.G., Barros A.A., Rodrigues J.A., Ferreira A.A., Goncalves C., Hammond J.R.M.: Yeast quality control in industrial brewing process using vitaltitration, a new method for vitality determination, pp. 618–626 in Proc. 29th Congr. Eur. Brewery Convention, Dublin 2003.

  • Šavel J.: Weight analysis of fermentation in small vessels. (In Czech) Kvasný Prům. 39, 226–228 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Siddique R., Smart K.A.: Predicting fermentation performance using proton efflux, pp. 46–53 in Brewing Yeast Fermentation Performance (K.A. Smart, Ed.). Blackwell Sci. Publ., Oxford (UK) 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigler K., Mikyška A., Kosař K., Gabriel P., Dientsbier M.: Factors affecting the outcome of the acidification power test of yeast quality: critical reappraisal. Folia Microbiol. 51, 525–534 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Syu M.J., Tsao G.T., Austin G.D., Celotto G., D’Amor T.: Neural network modeling for predicting brewing fermentations. J.Am. Soc.Brew.Chem. 52, 15–19 (1994).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taidi B., Hodgson J., Jones H., Robertson J., Mcfarlane G., Bland S., Hopper D., Montague G., Foxall R., Ring S., Kemsley K., Defernez M.: A statistical tool to aid improvement of fermentation consistency, pp. 258–256 in Proc. 31st Congr. European Brewery Convention, Venice (Italy) 2007.

  • Vincent S.F., Bell P.J.L., Bissinger P., Nevalainen K.M.-H.: Comparison of melibiose utilizing baker’s yeast strains produced by genetic engineering and classical breeding. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 28, 148–152 (1999).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Votruba J., Štěrbáček Z., Šavel J., Volf P.: The experience with application of expert systems for beer production in cylindroconical tanks. (In Czech) Kvasný Prům. 39, 257–261 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wackerbauer K., Evers H., Kunerth S.: Yeast propagation and activity of pure culture yeast. Brauwelt Internat. 17, 112–117 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellhoener U., Geiger E.: Definition of the physiological condition of a brewer’s yeast by means of enzyme activity measurements during propagation and fermentation, pp. 598–608 in Proc. 29th Congr. Eur. Brewery Convention, Dublin 2003.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Sigler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Košín, P., Šavel, J., Brož, A. et al. Control and prediction of the course of brewery fermentations by gravimetric analysis. Folia Microbiol 53, 451–456 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12223-008-0069-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12223-008-0069-z

Keywords

Navigation