Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Surface Chemical Analysis of C.I. Leuco Sulfur Black 1 Dyed Cotton Fabric Sequentially after-treated with Cationic Fixing Agent and Tannin

  • Published:
Fibers and Polymers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous studies have established that sequential cation-tannin after-treatment on sulfur dyed cotton fabric can improve the oxidative washing resistance against perborate-based laundering regimes. In this investigation, C.I. Sulfur Black 1 dyed cotton fabric was after-treated with a cationic fixing agent (Tinofix ECO) and tannin-based product (Bayprotect CL) and laundered with ISO 105 C09 washing protocol. The dyeings were evaluated for color strength and wash fastness. The surface functionalities and elemental composition of the dyeings were analyzed by using the surface sensitive X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) to compare visual changes with surface chemical changes. After-treated and laundered dyeings exhibited higher content of surface sulfur and lower surface oxidation as compared to the untreated counterparts. The S (2p) spectra of after-treated and laundered samples demonstrated reduced over oxidized (S6+) species at 168 eV. The effect of laundering and modification to the surface sulfur dye was related to K/S and % color loss analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. D. Broadbent, “Basic Principles of Textile Coloration”, Society of Dyers and Colorists, Bradford, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Shore, “Cellulosics Dyeing”, Society of Dyers and Colourists, Bradford, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. J. Prakash, R. Aravindhan, N. N. Fathimaa, and J. R. Rao, J. Am. Leather Chem. Assoc., 111, 383 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. A. Jaya Prakash, R. Aravindhan, N. Nishad Fathimaa, and J. Raghava Rao, J. Am. Leather Chem. Assoc., 111, 383 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. M. Burkinshaw and M. Paraskevas, Dyes Pigm., 87, 225 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. S. M. Burkinshaw, S. N. Chevli, and D. J. Marfell, Dyes Pigm., 45, 65 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. S. M. Burkinshaw, K. Lagonika, and D. J. Marfell, Dyes Pigm., 56, 251 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. S. M. Burkinshaw, K. Lagonika, and D. J. Marfell, Dyes Pigm., 58, 157 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. S. M. Burkinshaw and K. Lagonika, Dyes Pigm., 69, 185 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. J. Y. Cai, J. A. Rippon, J. McDonnell, and A. E. Parnell, Color. Technol., 128, 9 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. J. Robinson, J. Soc. Dyers Colour., 111, 172 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. A. Madhu, G. Singh, A. Sodhi, S. Malik, and Y. Madotra, J. Text. Apparel Technol. Manag., 7, 1 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. Zouhaier, D. Sofiène, and S. Faouzi, Eur. Sci. J., 10, 436 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. Baffoun, M. Hamdaoui, and Z. Romdhani, Indian J. Fibre Text. Res., 40, 57 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. P. Jaruhar and J. N. Chakraborty, Text. Res. J., 83, 1345 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. J. N. Chakrabortya and P. Jaruhar, Indian J. Fibre Text. Res., 39, 303 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  17. P. Jaruhar and J. N. Chakraborty, J. Chem. Chem. Eng., 7, 930 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. T. Bechtold, E. Burtscher, and A. Turcanu, J. Appl. Electrochem., 28, 1243 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. T. Bechtold, A. Turcanu, and W. Schrott, J. Appl. Electrochem., 38, 25 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. R. S. Blackburn and A. Harvey, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 4034 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. S. M. Burkinshaw, F. E. Chaccour, and A. Gotsopoulos, Dyes Pigm., 34, 227 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. S. M. Burkinshaw and G. W. Collins, Dyes Pigm., 29, 323 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. S. M. Burkinshaw and G. W. Collins, J. Soc. Dyers Colour., 114, 12 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. W. Zhou and Y. Yang, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 49, 4720 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. S. M. Burkinshaw and G. W. Collins, Dyes Pigm., 33, 1 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Q. Mohtashim and M. Rigout, NED Univ. J. Res., 14, 93 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Q. Mohtashim and M. Rigout, Mehran Univ. Res. J. Eng. Technol., 38, 421 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. P. J. Broadbent, Q. Mohtashim, M. Rigout, and C. M. Carr, Color. Technol., 136, 224 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Q. Mohtashim, M. Rigout, and C. M. Carr, Color. Technol., 136, 263 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. M. Quratulain, R. Muriel, and S. S. Hussain, Pigm. Resin Technol., 49, 431 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Q. Mohtashim, F. Asim, and S. Farooq, AATCC J. Res., 8, 33 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. D. M. Soignet, R. J. Berni, and R. R. Benerito, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 20, 2483 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Q. Mohtashim and M. Rigout, AATCC J. Res., 6, 1 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. M. N. Karim, M. Rigout, S. G. Yeates, and C. Carr, Dyes Pigm., 103, 168 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. J. Walton, P. Wincott, N. Fairley, and A. Carrick, “Peak Fitting with CasaXPS: A Casa Pocket Book”, Accolyte Science, Knutsford, UK, 2010.

  36. G. Soliman, C. M. Carr, C. C. Jones, and M. Rigout, Dyes Pigm., 96, 25 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Q. Mohtashim, M. Rigout, and C. Carr, Color. Technol., 136, 263 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. J. Buchert, J. Pere, L.-S. Johansson, and J. M. Campbell, Text. Res. J., 71, 626 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. J. C. Vickerman and I. S. Gilmore, “Surface Analysis: The Principal Techniques”, Wiley Online Library, 2009.

  40. B. D. Ratner and D. G. Castner, “Surface Analysis: The Principal Techniques”, 2nd ed., pp.47–112, John Wiley and Sons Ltd, Chichester, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  41. S. Rosunee, C. M. Carr, S. Hibbert, and C. Jones, J. Mater. Sci., 38, 2179 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank the Department of Textile Engineering, NED University of Engineering and Technology for providing facilities to fulfil the requirements of the experimental work. The author would also acknowledge financial support in terms of a PhD scholarship from NED University of Engineering and Technology, Pakistan through Higher Education Commission to carry out this study at the School of Materials, The University of Manchester, UK.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Textile Engineering, NED University of Engineering and Technology, Karachi, 75270, Pakistan

    Quratulain Mohtashim

  2. School of Design, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK

    Muriel Rigout

Authors
  1. Quratulain Mohtashim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Muriel Rigout
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Quratulain Mohtashim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mohtashim, Q., Rigout, M. Surface Chemical Analysis of C.I. Leuco Sulfur Black 1 Dyed Cotton Fabric Sequentially after-treated with Cationic Fixing Agent and Tannin. Fibers Polym 23, 736–744 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-022-3295-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-022-3295-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation