Skip to main content
Log in

Measurement of Interfacial Bonding Force between Foam and CFRP in Foam-Cored CFRP Sandwich Composites

  • Regular Articles
  • Published:
Fibers and Polymers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Polymer foam, a core material in the foam-cored carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) sandwich composites, is a low-strength material with porous characteristics and mechanical properties different from those of CFRP. Consequently, the accurate measurement of the material properties, such as the interfacial bonding force between the foam and CFRP of the foam-cored CFRP sandwich composite is difficult. This is because the foam becomes compressed and deformed if fixed by applying pressure, as in the case of the regular method. To mitigate this shortcoming, this study developed a novel test fixture for the measurement of the interfacial bonding force of foam-cored sandwich composites. Furthermore, a forming fixture was devised to uniformly fabricate samples used in the developed test fixture. Using the developed fixture of interfacial bonding force for foam-cored sandwich composites, the interfacial bonding force of CFRP sandwich composites was measured with respect to polymethacrylimide (PMI) foam (thermosetting polymer) and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) foam (thermoplastic polymer). The measured interfacial bonding strength between the PET foam and the CFRP was larger than the tensile strength of the PET foam. In contrast, the interfacial bonding force of PMI foam and CFRP was at the level 20 % of the tensile strength of the PMI foam. The microstructures were analyzed using an optical microscope and scanning electron microscope to investigate the cause. According to the results, the bonding area between the PMI foam and the CRFP resin was relatively small compared to that between the PET foam and the CFRP resin. The interfacial bonding force of foam-cored sandwich composites can be measured more accurately using the measurement fixture of the interfacial bonding force and the forming fixture developed in this study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L. Wu, J. Ban, Q. Jiang, T. T. Li, B. C. Shiu, S. Y. Huang, C. W. Lou, and J. H. Lin, Fiber. Polym., 20, 1277 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. T. George, V. S. Deshpande, K. Sharp, and H. N. G. Wadley, Compos. Struct., 108, 696 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. P. Ma, F. Zhang, G. Jiang, Z. Gao, and D. Xia, Fiber. Polym., 15, 1560 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. G. Bragagnolo, A. D. Crocombe, S. L. Ogin, I. Mohagheghian, A. Sordon, G. Meeks, and C. Santoni, Mater. Des., 186, 108312 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. W. J. Cantwell and P. Davies, Appl. Compos. Mater., 3, 407 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Akay and R. Hanna, Compos., 21, 325 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. G. Sun, D. Chen, H. Wang, P. J. Hazell, and Q. Li, Int. J. Impact. Eng., 122, 119 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. E. Wang, Q. Li, and G. Sun, Thin-Walled Struct., 147, 106494 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. B. Du, L. Chen, J. Tan, H. Zhou, Y. Zhao, W. Wu, and L. Chen, Int. J. Mech. Sci., 149, 101 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. M. C. Saha, E. Kabir, and S. Jeelani, Mater. Lett., 62, 567 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Q. Wu, L. Ma, L. Wu, and J. Xiong, Compos. Mater., 153, 585 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  12. C. Capela, J. A. M. Ferreira, and J. D. Costa, Fiber. Polym., 14, 597 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. V. Koissin, V. Skvortsov, and A. Shipsha, Compos. Struct., 78, 507 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. E. A. Flores-Johnson and Q. M. Li, Compos. B Eng., 42, 1212 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. H. E. Yalkin, B. M. Icten, and T. Alpyildiz, Compos. B Eng., 79, 383 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Armacell, ArmaPET_Struct Technical Data, https://local.armacell.com/fileadmin/cms/pet-foams/ArmaPET_website/Product_Flyer/ArmaPET_Struct_GR.pdf (Accessed March 1, 2020).

  17. Rohacell, Product Information, https://www.rohacell.com/product/peek-industrial/downloads/rohacell%20ig-f_2020_january.pdf (Accessed March 1, 2020).

  18. SK Chemical, Materials Selection Guide, https://www.skchemicals.com/download/TDS/SKYFLEX/SKYFLEX_MSG_ver2.0.pdf (Accessed March 1, 2020).

  19. W. Y. Jeong, J. C. Lee, S. H. Lee, G. H. Kim, K. Y. Kim, and D. Y. Lim, Korea Patent, 10-2026288 (2019).

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Civil-Military Technology Cooperation Program (Project number 17-CM-MA-24) and the Korea Institute of Industrial Technology (KITECH JA-190019).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dae Young Lim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, JC., Yu, S., Jung, HS. et al. Measurement of Interfacial Bonding Force between Foam and CFRP in Foam-Cored CFRP Sandwich Composites. Fibers Polym 22, 1934–1939 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-021-0236-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-021-0236-2

Keywords

Navigation