Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of Molasses as a Green Reducing Agent in Sulfur Dyeing

  • Regular Articles
  • Published:
Fibers and Polymers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of coloration for a textile material is to achieve high-quality dyed fabric with good levelness, fastness, and ecological and economical process. In this study, the potential use of molasses as an ecological reducing agent was evaluated for CI Leuco Sulfur Black 1 with respect to the redox potential values of the dyeing liquid, dyeability, fastness values, and waste liquid parameters. It was concluded that molasses can be used instead of commercial products in the exhaustion method and is easily applicable for bulk processes in dyeing mills. Furthermore, the color yield can be improved by increasing the absorption value and impregnation temperature and by using mercerized fabric in the pad-dyeing method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. M. Burkinshaw and G. Salihu, Dyes Pigm., 161, 581 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. S. M. Burkinshaw and G. Salihu, Dyes Pigm., 161, 614 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. E. R. Trotman, “Dyeing and Chemical Technology of Textile Fibres”, 6th ed., pp.396–406, Oxford Verbatim Ltd., London, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. N. Chakraborty, “Fundamentals and Practices in Colouration of Textiles”, 2nd ed., pp.46–58, Woodhead Publishing India PVT Ltd., New Delhi, 2014.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. A. K. R. Choudhury, “Textile Preparation and Dyeing”, pp.585–597, Science Publishers, Enfield, New Hampshire, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  6. C. Kan, H. Cheung, and F. Kooh, Fiber. Polym., 18, 767 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. M. Mohsin, A. Rasheed, A. Farooq, M. Ashraf, and A. Shah, J. Cleaner Prod., 53, 341 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. J. R. Aspland, Text. Chem. Color., 24, 21 (1992).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. M. D. Teli, R. Paul, S. M. Landage, and A. Aich, Indian J. Fibres Text. Res., 26, 101 (2001).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. H. Zollinger, “Color Chemistry Syntheses, Properties, and Applications of Organic Dyes and Pigments”, 3rd ed., pp.351–363, Wiley-VCH, Zürich, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Bozic and V. Kokol, Dyes Pigm., 76, 299 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Y. V. Polenov, V. A. Pushkina, V. V. Budanov, and O. S. Khilinskaya, Russ. J. Appl. Chem., 74, 1301 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. G. Tchobanoglous and F. L. Burton, “Waste Water Engineering Treatment, Disposal and Reuse”, 3rd ed., pp.47–111, McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1991.

  14. M. Clark, “Handbook of Textile and Industrial Dyeing”, Woodhead Publishing Ltd., Oxford, Cambridge, 2011.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. H. Tanveer and A. Wahab, J. Cleaner Prod., 198, 806 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. M. Teklehaimanot and T. Amsalu, J. Text. Sci. Eng., 8, 384 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. S. Blackburn and A. Harvey, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 4034 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. A. Madhu, G. Singh, A. Sodhi, S. Malik, and Y. Madotra, J. Text. Apparel Technol. Manag., 7, 1 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  19. P. Jaruhar and J. N. Chakraborty, Text. Res. J., 83, 1345 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. S. K. Nicholson and P. John, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 68, 117 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. W. Czajkowski and J. Misztal, Dyes Pigm., 26, 771 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. W. Marte and R. Ulisbach, U. S. Patent, 4950306 (1990).

  23. A. Vuorema, P. John, M. Keskitalo, M. A. Kulandainathan, and F. Marken, Dyes Pigm., 76, 542 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. T. Bechtold, A. Turcanu, H. Brunner, and W. Schrott, J. Appl. Electrochem., 39, 1963 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. S. M. Burkinshaw and J. W. Collins, Dyes Pigm., 29, 323 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. S. R. Shukla and R. S. Pai, Indian J. Fibres Text. Res., 29, 454 (2004).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. N. A. Ibrahim, A. R. El-Gamal, and F. Mahrous, J. Nat. Fibres, 5, 238 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. R. B. Chavan and S. Vhanbatte, Indian J. Fibres Text. Res., 27, 179 (2002).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. K. Celik, MS Dissertation, SDU, Isparta, 2018.

  30. M. F. Kavas and M. J. Leblebici, “Kalite ve Isletme Kontrol Laboratuvarlari El Kitabi”, Turkiye Seker Fabrikalari A.S., Genel Mudurlugu Ankara (In Turkish), pp.129–130 and p.246, 2004.

  31. Archroma (www.archroma.com), Diresul Technical Information, pp.1–52, 2013.

  32. Archroma (www.archroma.com), Leonil® EHC Liquid Conc. Technical Information, pp.1–3, 2013.

  33. Archroma (www.archroma.com), Dekol® 2005 Liquid Conc., Technical Information, pp.1–5, 2013.

  34. Archroma (www.archroma.com), Reducing Agent D p Technical Information, pp.1–4, 2013.

  35. F. Akarslan, Ph.D. Dissertation, SDU, Isparta, 2008.

  36. R. Veberic and F. Stampar, In Proceeding of the 2005 FRUTIC Conference, Montpellier, 2005.

  37. Hach Company (www.hach.com)/Hach Lange GmbH, Sulfite DOC316. 53.01162, Iodate-iodide Method, Method 8071, 0–500 mg/L as SO3−2 (or 0 to more than 500 mg/L), Buret Titration, 2007–2015.

  38. Hach Company (www.hach.com)/Hach Lange GmbH, Sulfite DOC316.52. 93090, Based on 4500-SO3−2 B in Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, Amperometric Back Titration, 2014–2016.

  39. R. Zouhaier, D. Sofiène, and S. Faouzi, Eur. Sci. J., 10, 436 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  40. J. M. Carraher, C. N. Fleitman, and J. P. Tessonnier, ACS Catal., 5, 3162 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. S. Zhao, X. Guo, P. Bai, and L. V. Lingjuan, Asian J. Chem., 26, 4537 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. T. Bechtold, F. Berktoldand, and A. Turcanu, Color. Technol., 116, 215 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. L. A. Meszaros, U. S. Patent, 5470356 (1995).

  44. A. F. Carey, “Organic Chemistry”, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Y. Yang and V. Naarani, Color. Technol., 120, 127 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. S. Fu, D. Hinks, P. Hauser, and M. Ankeny, Cellulose, 20, 3101 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. S. R. Karmakar, “Chemical Technology in the Pre-Treatment Processes of Textiles”, pp.279–309, Elsevier Publishing, Amsterdam, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  48. M. A. Kulandainathan, K. Patil, A. Muthukumaran, and R. B. Chavan, Color. Technol., 123, 143 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. L. Saikhaoa, J. Setthayanond, T. Karpkird, T. Bechtold, and P. Suwanruji, J. Cleaner Prod., 197, 106 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Archroma, Reducing Agent D Powder, MSDS, KS13599, pp.1–11, 2018.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are particularly grateful to Mahir Torsun and Hamza Kılıc (Kadifeteks Corporation, İstanbul) for color evaluation, and Ufuk Elibuyuk for his help.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meliha Oktav Bulut.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bulut, M.O., Çelik, K. Evaluation of Molasses as a Green Reducing Agent in Sulfur Dyeing. Fibers Polym 21, 2024–2035 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-020-1231-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-020-1231-8

Keywords

Navigation