Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Carbon and eco-footprints of adult incontinence products

  • Published:
Fibers and Polymers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research article discusses the modelling and simulation results of carbon and eco-footprints of adult incontinence products. Four types of products are considered in this study: two types of diapers-commercial and new diapers and two types of pants-commercial and new type of pants. New types of diapers and pants were developed by our research team in the Institute of Textiles & Clothing of The Hong Kong Polytechnic University. Carbon and eco-footprints were modeled by using IPCC 2001 method (100 Years) and ecological footprint method (taken from Ecoinvent 2.0) of SIMAPRO 7.3.2 version of LCA software. Datasets from Ecoinvent database inbuilt with SIMAPRO software were used to build the life cycle scenarios. Life cycle scenarios of four types of incontinence products were built for the entire life cycle of products from cradle to grave stages. In this research study, the contribution analysis (hot-spots in the life cycle stages) of carbon and eco-footprints of each type of product under consideration are highlighted. From the modeling and simulation results, it was noticed that the new reusable pants created the lowest carbon and eco-footprints compared to its counterparts. New type of diaper created slightly higher carbon and eco-footprints compared to the commercial diaper type. From the process contribution analysis, it was found that the production and disposal of SAP, generation of electricity for polypropylene, production processes of cotton were the contributors of major impacts in the order of hierarchy. From this detailed LCA study, it was understood that if the new type of reusable pants will be used without disposable inserts, it can bring carbon and eco-footprints significantly down.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) and SETAC Foundation for Environmental Education Inc., “A Technical Framework for Lifecycle Assessment”, Washington, DC: Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry and SETAC Foundation for Environmental Education Inc. (Workshop Held in Smugglers Notch, Vermont, August 1883, 1990), 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC), “Guidelines for Lifecycle Assessment: A “Code of Practice”, SETAC workshop in Sesimbra, Portugal 31 March 3 April, Brussels, SETAC, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  3. ISO 14040, Environmental Management-Life Cycle Assessment-Principles and Frame Work. International Organisation for Standardisation, Geneva, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  4. ISO 14044, Environmental Management-Life Cycle Assessment, International Organisation for Standardisation, Geneva, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. U. Ayres, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 14, 199 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. H. Baumann and A. M. Tillman, “A Hitchhiker’s Guide to Life Cycle Assessment”, Studentlitteratur, Lund, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. Aumôier and M. Collins, Life Cycle Assessment of Disposable and Reusable Nappies in the UK, Environment Agency, UK, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  8. T. Ekvall, A. M. Tillman, and S. Molander, J. Cleaner Prod., 13, 1225 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC), “A Conceptual Framework for Life Cycle Impact Assessment”, SETAC Press, Pensacola, FL, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nordic Council of Ministers (NoRD, 1992): Product Life Cycle Assessments — Principles and Methodology, NORD, Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen, pp.263–280, 1992.

  11. R. Heijungs, J. B. Guinee, G. Huppes, R. M. Lankreijer, H. A. Udo de Haes, A. Wegener Sleeswijk, A. M. M. Ansems, P. G. Eggels, R. van Duin, and H. P. de Goede, “Environmental Life-Cycle Assessment of Products Guide and Background”, CML, Leiden University, Leiden, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. B. Guinee, R. Heijungs, and G. Huppes, Int. J. LCA., 9, 23 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. M. Z. Hauschild, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 81 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. R. Heijungs, J. Cleaner Prod., 4, 159 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. L. G. Lindfors, K. Christiansen, L. Hoffmann, Y. Virtanen, V. Juntilla, O. J. Hanssen, A. Ronning, T. Ekvall, and G. Finnveden, “Nordic Guideline on Life-Cycle Assessment”, NORD 1995, 2nd ed., Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  16. S. S. Muthu, Y. Li, J. Y. Hu, and P. Y. Mok, Journal of Fibre Bioengineering and Informatics, 1.4, 307 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  17. B. W. Vigon, D. A. Tolle, B. W. Cornaby, H. C. Latham, C. L. Harrison, T. L. Boguski, R. G. Hunt, and J. D. Sel, “Life-Cycle Assessment: Inventory Guidelines and Principles”, EPA/600/R-92/245, USEPA, Washington, DC, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  18. O. J. Hansen, Int. J. LCA, 44, 315 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. PAS 2050, Guide to PAS 2050: How to Assess the Carbon Footprint of Goods and Services, British Standards Institution, UK, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. Colón, L. Ruggieri, A. Sánchez, A. González, and I. Puig, Waste Manag Res., 29, 249 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. F. S. F. Ng, S. S. Muthu, Y. Li, and P. C. L. Hui, Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, In press.

  22. S. Aumônier, M. Collins, and P. Garrett,, An Updated Lifecycle Assessment Study for Disposable and Reusable Nappies Science Report SC010018/SR2 Environment Agency, UK, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Franklin Associates, Energy and Environmental profile Analysis of Children’s Single Use and Cloth Diapers (Revised Report) Prairie Village, Kansas: Franklin Associates, 1992.

  24. C. Lehrburger, J. Mullne, and C. V. Jones, Diapers: Environmental Impacts and Lifecycle Analysis, Report to National Association of Diaper Services, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  25. A. D. Little, Disposable Versus Reusable Diapers: Health, Environmental and Economic Comparisons, Report to Proctor & Gamble, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Franklin Associates, Energy and Environmental Profile Analysis of Children’s Single Use and Cloth Diapers (Revised Report), Prairie Village, Kansas: Franklin Associates, 1992.

  27. B. J. Sauer, C. C. Hilderbrandt, W. E. Franklin, and R. G. Hunt, Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 13, 1003 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. A. T. Vizcarra, K. V. Lo, and P. H. Liao, Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 13, 1707 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. K. R. O’Brien, R. Olive, Y. C. Hsu, R. Bell, L. Morris, and N. Kendall, Life Cycle Assessment: Reusable and disposable nappies in Australia. Australian Life Cycle Assessment Society Conference 2009 6th Australian Conference on Life Cycle Assessment, Melbourne 17–19 February, 2009: 1–14, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  30. PCR, CPC Division 32193, Draft PCR: Absorbent Hygiene Products, The International EPD System, Feb 2011.

  31. M. A. J. Huijbregts, S. Hellweg, R. Frischknecht, K. Hungerbühler, and A. J. Hendriks, Ecological Economics, 64, 798 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. M. Wackernagel, W. Rees, and P. I. Testemale, “Our Ecological Footprint — Reducing Human Impact on the Earth”, New Society Publishers, Philadelphia, PA, and Gabriola Island, BC, Canada, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  33. R. Frischknecht, N. Jungbluth, H.-J. Althaus, C. Bauer, G. Doka, R. Dones, R. Hischier, S. Hellweg, S. Humbert, T. Kollner, Y. Loerincik, M. Margni, and T. Nemecek, Implementation of Life Cycle Impact Assessment Methods: Data version 2.0, Ecoinvent report No. 3, Swiss centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Dübendorf, Switzerland, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Textiles and Clothing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China

    Subramanian Senthilkannan Muthu, Frency S. F. Ng, Yi Li, Patrick C. L. Hui & Yueping Guo

Authors
  1. Subramanian Senthilkannan Muthu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Frency S. F. Ng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yi Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Patrick C. L. Hui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yueping Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frency S. F. Ng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Muthu, S.S., Ng, F.S.F., Li, Y. et al. Carbon and eco-footprints of adult incontinence products. Fibers Polym 14, 1776–1781 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-013-1776-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-013-1776-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation