This study aims to evaluate the effect of mechanical properties on consumers’ preference for fashion leather items, and to classify them by the mechanical properties of synthetic leather. Mechanical properties were measured by the KES-FB system and a survey of experts was conducted with a preference evaluation for various items using 15 types of synthetic polyurethane leather. More easily transformable and lighter leathers are preferred for clothing, while the leathers that have better dimensional stability are preferred for purses, bags, shoes, and boots, and those with smooth surface are preferred for furniture. Furthermore, synthetic leathers were classified into three clusters by mechanical properties. There was no difference between clusters in preference for non-clothing item, because no perception of various mechanical properties was caused by the structural characteristics of each items by design. On the other hand, for clothing items, consumers’ preferences are significantly affected by mechanical properties.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
MK Business News Article on April 5, 2012.
Weekly Trade Article on July 13, 2012.
M. Szycher, “Szycher’s Handbook of Polyurethanes”, CRC Press, New York, 1999.
J. Y. Kim, J. Y. Woo, and S. Kim, Text. Sci. Eng., 27, 21 (1990).
E. J. Lee and C. E. Baik, J. Korean Soc. Knit Design, 4, 49 (2006).
F. C. Brenner and C. S. Chen, Text. Res. J., 34, 505 (1964).
F. C. Brenner and C. S. Chen, Text. Res. J., 35, 587 (1965).
F. C. Brenner and D. G. Britt, Text. Res. J., 34, 754 (1964).
P. Grosberg, Text. Res. J., 36, 205 (1966).
P. Grosberg and N. M. Swani, Text. Res. J., 36, 332 (1966).
P. Grosberg and S. Kedia, Text. Res. J., 36, 71 (1966).
S. Kawabata, “The Standardization and Analysis of Hand Evaluation”, 2nd ed., The Hand Evaluation and Standardi-Zation Committee, The Textile Machinery Society of Japan, Osaka, 1980.
H. Yokura and M. Niwa, Text. Res. J., 58, 398 (1988).
K. L. Yick, K. P. Cheng, and Y. L. How, Int. J. Cloth. Sci. Technol., 7, 17 (1995).
V. A. Cardello, C. Winterhalter, and G. H. Schutz, Text. Res. J., 73, 221 (2003).
J. H. Shin, C. R. Park, and C. Cho, J. Korean Soc. Cloth. Text., 23, 66 (1999).
M. J. Kim and S. H. Lee, J. Korean Soc. Cloth. Ind., 7, 439 (2005).
H. S. Shim and E. A. McCullough, J. Korean Soc. Cloth. Ind., 10, 537 (2008).
K. I. Shin and J. J. Kim, J. Korean Soc. Cloth. Text., 24, 128 (2000).
J. S. Lee and H. W. Shin, J. Korean Soc. Cloth. Text., 24, 277 (2000).
E. K. Roh, E. Kim, K. R. Park, and E. E. Kim, “Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles Conference”, Seoul, April 216, 2011.
D. S. Kim, Text. Sci. Eng., 25, 56 (1988).
E. K. Roh and K. W. Oh, “Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles Conference”, Seoul, April 192, 2012.
H. W. Shin and J. S. Lee, J. Korean Soc. Cloth. Text., 23, 541 (1999).
E. K. Roh and H. S. Ryu, J. Korean Soc. Cloth. Text., 31, 1240 (2007).
S. R. Kim, “Textiles”, Kyomunsa, Seoul, 2000.
About this article
Cite this article
Roh, E.K., Oh, K.W. & Kim, S.H. Classification of synthetic polyurethane leather by mechanical properties according to consumers’ preference for fashion items. Fibers Polym 14, 1731–1738 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-013-1731-x
- Synthetic polyurethane leather
- Mechanical property
- Fashion items (jacket, purse, bag, shoes, boots, furniture)