Classification of synthetic polyurethane leather by mechanical properties according to consumers’ preference for fashion items

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the effect of mechanical properties on consumers’ preference for fashion leather items, and to classify them by the mechanical properties of synthetic leather. Mechanical properties were measured by the KES-FB system and a survey of experts was conducted with a preference evaluation for various items using 15 types of synthetic polyurethane leather. More easily transformable and lighter leathers are preferred for clothing, while the leathers that have better dimensional stability are preferred for purses, bags, shoes, and boots, and those with smooth surface are preferred for furniture. Furthermore, synthetic leathers were classified into three clusters by mechanical properties. There was no difference between clusters in preference for non-clothing item, because no perception of various mechanical properties was caused by the structural characteristics of each items by design. On the other hand, for clothing items, consumers’ preferences are significantly affected by mechanical properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.

    MK Business News Article on April 5, 2012.

  2. 2.

    Weekly Trade Article on July 13, 2012.

  3. 3.

    M. Szycher, “Szycher’s Handbook of Polyurethanes”, CRC Press, New York, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    J. Y. Kim, J. Y. Woo, and S. Kim, Text. Sci. Eng., 27, 21 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    E. J. Lee and C. E. Baik, J. Korean Soc. Knit Design, 4, 49 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    F. C. Brenner and C. S. Chen, Text. Res. J., 34, 505 (1964).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    F. C. Brenner and C. S. Chen, Text. Res. J., 35, 587 (1965).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    F. C. Brenner and D. G. Britt, Text. Res. J., 34, 754 (1964).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    P. Grosberg, Text. Res. J., 36, 205 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    P. Grosberg and N. M. Swani, Text. Res. J., 36, 332 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    P. Grosberg and S. Kedia, Text. Res. J., 36, 71 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    S. Kawabata, “The Standardization and Analysis of Hand Evaluation”, 2nd ed., The Hand Evaluation and Standardi-Zation Committee, The Textile Machinery Society of Japan, Osaka, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    H. Yokura and M. Niwa, Text. Res. J., 58, 398 (1988).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    K. L. Yick, K. P. Cheng, and Y. L. How, Int. J. Cloth. Sci. Technol., 7, 17 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    V. A. Cardello, C. Winterhalter, and G. H. Schutz, Text. Res. J., 73, 221 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    J. H. Shin, C. R. Park, and C. Cho, J. Korean Soc. Cloth. Text., 23, 66 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    M. J. Kim and S. H. Lee, J. Korean Soc. Cloth. Ind., 7, 439 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    H. S. Shim and E. A. McCullough, J. Korean Soc. Cloth. Ind., 10, 537 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    K. I. Shin and J. J. Kim, J. Korean Soc. Cloth. Text., 24, 128 (2000).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    J. S. Lee and H. W. Shin, J. Korean Soc. Cloth. Text., 24, 277 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    E. K. Roh, E. Kim, K. R. Park, and E. E. Kim, “Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles Conference”, Seoul, April 216, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    D. S. Kim, Text. Sci. Eng., 25, 56 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    E. K. Roh and K. W. Oh, “Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles Conference”, Seoul, April 192, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    H. W. Shin and J. S. Lee, J. Korean Soc. Cloth. Text., 23, 541 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    E. K. Roh and H. S. Ryu, J. Korean Soc. Cloth. Text., 31, 1240 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    S. R. Kim, “Textiles”, Kyomunsa, Seoul, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kyung Wha Oh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roh, E.K., Oh, K.W. & Kim, S.H. Classification of synthetic polyurethane leather by mechanical properties according to consumers’ preference for fashion items. Fibers Polym 14, 1731–1738 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-013-1731-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Synthetic polyurethane leather
  • Mechanical property
  • Preference
  • Classification
  • Fashion items (jacket, purse, bag, shoes, boots, furniture)