Skip to main content
Log in

A study of hydrophobic electrospun membrane applied in seawater desalination by membrane distillation

  • Published:
Fibers and Polymers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, two composite nanofibrous membranes of Polyvinylidenefluoride (PVDF) and [poly(vinylidenefluorideco-hexafluoropropylene)] (PVDF-co-HFP) prepared by the electrospinning process were employed in a direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD) system. We changed the pump flow rate and temperature difference to examine their effects on permeate flux and salt rejection. The SEM observations, porosity analyzer technique, and contact angle measurement indicated the nanobrous membrane with an average fiber diameter of 170 nm and maximum pore diameter distribution of 0.3 µm is the best membrane for the DCMD system. However, the ability of the hydrophobic membrane affects the filtration efficiency of the DCMD system. The contact angle of the PVDF-HFP electrospun membrane (128°) shows better hydrophobic than the PVDF electrospun membrane (125 °). From the experiment of 12 hours, the salt rejection of PVDFHFP (99.9901 %) was better than that of PVDF composite membrane (99.9888 %) and was almost the same as that of the PTFE commercial membrane (99.9951 %). In addition, the permeate flux of the PVDF-HFP composite membrane is 4.28 kg/ m2hr higher than the PTFE commercial membrane.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. D. Khawaji, I. K. Kutubkhanah, and J. M. Wie, Desalination, 221, 27 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. C. Charcosset, Desalination 245, 214 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. G. Micale, A. Cipollina, and L. Rizzuti, “Seawater Desalination for Freshwater Production Seawater Desalination”, pp.1–15, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Germany, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  4. N. Dow, J. Zhang, M. Duke, J. Li, S. R. Gray, and E. Ostarcevic, “Membrane Distillation of Brine Wastes Research Report 63”, Water Quality Research Australia, Adelaide, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Kullab and A. Martin, Separation and Purication Technology, 76, 231 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. M. S. El-Bourawi, Z. Ding, R. Ma, and M. Khayet, J. Membrane Sci., 285, 4 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. K. W. Lawson and D. R. Lloyd, J. Membrane Sci., 124, 1 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. M. Qtaishat, D. Rana, M. Khayet, and T. Matsuura, J. Membrane Sci., 327, 264 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. R. Lydon, E. Mayer, and G. R. Rideal, “Comparative Methods for the Pore Size Distribution of Woven and Metal Filter Media”, 9th World Filtration Congress, 2004.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ching-Iuan Su.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Su, CI., Shih, JH., Huang, MS. et al. A study of hydrophobic electrospun membrane applied in seawater desalination by membrane distillation. Fibers Polym 13, 698–702 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-012-0698-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-012-0698-3

Keywords

Navigation