Skip to main content
Log in

A comparative study on wool bio-antifelting based on different chemical pretreatments

  • Published:
Fibers and Polymers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The enzymatic antifelting of wool with proteases, which is referred to as bio-antifelting, has become a promising eco-friendly alternative to conventional chlorination treatment. However, wool bio-antifelting in industrial scale has not been reached so far due to its unsatisfactory shrink-resistance and uncontrolled action in fiber damage. In this paper, the action and mechanism of two kinds of chemical pretreatments, i.e., hydrogen peroxide and dichlorodicyanuric acid pretreatments on the shrink-resistance of protease-treated wool fabrics were investigated and compared. The results show that although hydrogen peroxide treatment could decrease the shrinkage of wool in comparison with untreated one, its contribution to the enhancement of wool bio-antifelting with protease was not remarkable. An effective shrink-resistance can be obtained when the wool fabric was treated with dichlorodicyanuric acid and protease consecutively. Both of the two chemical pretreatments could improve the wettability and whiteness of protease-treated wool. The mechanism of different pretreatments for enhancing wool bio-antifelting with protease was further illustrated and compared via several microscopic analyses such as Allwörden’s reaction, FTIR-ATR and SEM. The comprehensive comparison for wool bio-antifelting based on different chemical pretreatments reveals the difference of hydrogen peroxide and dichlorodicyanuric acid pretreatments in antifelting mechanism, which is valuable for getting a clear understanding and further modification of wool bio-antifelting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. W. S. Simpson and G. H. Crawshaw, “Wool: Science and Technology”, pp.219–221, Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2002.

  2. W. L. Zhou, “Application of Enzymes in Textiles”, pp.216–225, China Textile Press, 2002.

  3. A. Cavaco-Paulo and G. M. Gübitz, “Textile Processing with Enzymes”, p.115, Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2002.

  4. H. El-Sayed, A. Kantouch, E. Heine, and H. Höcker, Color. Technol., 117, 234 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. P. Jovancic, D. Jocic, R. Molina, M. R. Julia, and P. Erra, Text. Res. J., 71, 948 (2001).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. J. Shen, D. P. Bishop, E. Heine, and B. Hollfelder, J. Text. Inst., 90, 404 (1999).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. A. Riva, I. Algaba, and R. Prieto, J. Nat. Fibers, 3, 209 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. R. Levene, Y. Cohen, and D. Barkai, J. Soc. Dyers Colour., 112, 6 (1996).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. J. A. Riva, J. Cegarra, I. Algaba, and R. Prieto, J. Soc. Dyers Colour., 109, 210 (1993).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. C. J. S. M. Silva, Q. Zhang, J. Shen, and A. Cavaco-Paulo, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 39, 634 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. H. El-Sayed, R. R. Hamed, and A. Kantouch, AATCC Rev., 2, 25 (2002).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. P. Jovancic, D. Jocic, and J. Dumic, J. Text. Inst., 89, 390 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. J. Shen, M. Rushforth, A. Cavaco-Paulo, G. Guebitz, and H. Lenting, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 40, 1656 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. K. Schumacher, E. Heine, and H. Höcker, J. Biotechnol., 89, 281 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. H. B. M. Lenting, M. Schroeder, G. Guebitz, A. Cavaco-Paulo, and J. Shen, Biotechnol. Letter, 28, 711 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. G. C. Du, L. Cui, Y. Zhu, and J. Chen, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 40, 1753 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. K. Sun and W. L. Zhou. Proc. AATCC Inter. Conf. & Exhibition, 299 (1998).

  18. J. M. Cardamone, J. Yao, and A. Nunez, Text. Res. J., 74, 887 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. J. M. Cardamone, A. Nunez, R. Ashby, and R. Dudley, Text. Res. J., 76, 99 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. W. L. Zhou, J. Yuan, and M. S. Li, J. Text. Res. (Chinese), 22, 325 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  21. H. K. Rouette, “Encyclopedia in Textile Finishing”, p.83, Springer, 2000.

  22. A. P. Negri, H. J. Cornell, and D. E. Rivett, Aust. J. Agric. Res., 42, 1285 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. W. S. Simpson and G. H. Crawshaw, “Wool: Science and Technology”, Woodhead Publishing, p.70, 2002.

  24. M. Lewin and E. M. Pearce, “Handbook of Fibre Chemistry”, p.368, Marcel Dekker, 1998.

  25. J. Z. Shao, J. Q. Liu, J. H. Zheng, and C. M. Carr, J. Text. Res. (Chinese), 22, 285 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xuerong Fan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, Q., Wang, P., Fan, X. et al. A comparative study on wool bio-antifelting based on different chemical pretreatments. Fibers Polym 10, 724–730 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-010-0724-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-010-0724-2

Keywords

Navigation