Skip to main content
Log in

IRONSperm swimming by rigid-body rotation versus transverse bending waves influenced by cell membrane charge

  • Research
  • Published:
Journal of Micro and Bio Robotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cell membrane potential affects the electrostatic self-assembly of magnetizable nanoparticles around the flagellum of sperm cells, leading to the formation of biohybrid microrobots (i.e., IRONSperm) with various bending stiffness. Here we explain the influence of bull sperm cell membrane potential on the formation of two types of IRONSperm samples that are produced by electrostatic self-assembly. The first type is a proximal-coated soft body with nanoparticles concentrated on the head to maintain high flexibility of the flagellum and create a passively propagating transverse bending wave under the influence of an external rotating magnetic field. The second type is a rigid-body with nanoparticles approximately uniformly distributed along the length to provide arbitrary geometry that maintains a constant chiral shape and propel by rotation about its long axis. We present a magneto-elastohydrodynamic model to predict the swimming speed at low Reynolds number for rigid IRONSperm with arbitrary shapes, and show that decreasing the bending stiffness allows the model to capture the behavior of its soft counterpart. While the response of a rigid chiral IRONSperm is distinguished by a greater swimming speed with a smooth decay with frequency, the benefit of a soft flagellum in certain scenarios would present a much smaller range of frequencies for wireless actuation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

Additional data are available upon request from the authors.

References

  1. Nelson BJ, Kaliakatsos IK, Abbott JJ (2010) Microrobots for minimally invasive medicine. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 12:55–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sitti M, Ceylan H, Hu W, Giltinan J, Turan M, Yim S, Diller E (2015) Biomedical applications of untethered mobile milli/microrobots. Proc IEEE Inst Electr Electron Eng 103:205–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang L, Petit T, Lu Y, Kratochvil BE, Peyer KE, Pei R, Lou J, Nelson BJ (2010) Controlled propulsion and cargo transport of rotating nickel nanowires near a patterned solid surface. ACS Nano 4:6228–6234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kummer MP, Abbott JJ, Kratochvil BE, Borer R, Sengul A, Nelson BJ (2010) OctoMag: an electromagnetic system for 5-DOF wireless micromanipulation. IEEE Trans Robot 26:1006–1017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Behkam B, Sitti M (2007) Bacterial flagella-based propulsion and on/off motion control of microscale objects. Appl Phys Lett 90:023902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Magdanz V, Gebauer J, Mahdi D, Simmchen J, Khalil ISM (2019) In: International conference on manipulation, automation and robotics at small scales (MARSS). pp. 1–6

  7. Reid AT, Redgrove K, Aitken RJ, Nixon B (2011) Cellular mechanisms regulating sperm-zona pellucida interaction. Asian J Androl 13:88–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Huang X, Jain PK, El-Sayed IH, El-Sayed MA (2008) Plasmonic photothermal therapy (PPTT) using gold nanoparticles. Lasers Med Sci 23:217–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yan X, Zhou Q, Vincent M, Deng Y, Yu J, Xu J, Xu T, Tang T, Bian L, Wang Y-XJ, Kostarelos K, Zhang L (2017) Multifunctional biohybrid magnetite microrobots for imaging-guided therapy. Sci Robot 2:eaaq1155

  10. Na HB, Song IC, Hyeon T (2009) Inorganic nanoparticles for MRI contrast agents. Adv Mat 21:2133–2148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dias JMS, Estima D, Punte H, Klingner A, Marques L, Magdanz V, Khalil ISM (2022) Modeling and characterization of the passive bending stiffness of nanoparticle-coated sperm cells using magnetic excitation. Adv The Sim 5:2100438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Magdanz V, Vivaldi J, Mohanty S, Klingner A, Vendittelli M, Simmchen J, Misra S, Khalil ISM (2021) Impact of segmented magnetization on the flagellar propulsion of sperm-templated microrobots. Adv Sci 8:2004037

  13. Teves ME, Roldan ERS (2021) Sperm bauplan and function and underlying processes of sperm formation and selection. Physiol Rev 102(1):7–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gao W, Feng X, Pei A, Kane CR, Tam R, Hennessy C, Wang J (2014) Bioinspired helical microswimmers based on vascular plants. Nano Lett 14:305–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kamata K, Piao Z, Suzuki S, Fujimori T, Tajiri W, Nagai K, Iyoda T, Yamada A, Hayakawa T, Ishiwara M, Horaguchi S, Belay A, Tanaka T, Takano K, Hangyo M (2015) Spirulina-templated metal microcoils with controlled helical structures for THz electromagnetic responses. Sci Rep 4:4919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gilbert D, Ehrenstein G (1984) Membrane surface charge. Squid Axon 22:407–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Klausen LH, Fuhs T, Dong M (2016) Mapping surface charge density of lipid bilayers by quantitative surface conductivity microscopy. Nat Commun 7:12447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Brennen C, Winnet H (1977) Fluid mechanics of propulsion by cilia and flagella. Ann Rev Fluid Mech 9:339–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Magdanz V, Gebauer J, Sharan P, Eltoukhy S, Voigt D, Simmchen J (2019) Sperm-particle interactions and their prospects for charge mapping. Adv Biosys 3:1900061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Okuno M, Hiramoto Y (1979) Direct measurements of the stiffness of echinoderm sperm flagella. J Exp Biol 79:235–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Magarkar A, Dhawan V, Kallinteri P, Viitala T, Elmowafy M, Róg T, Bunker A (2014) Cholesterol level affects surface charge of lipid membranes in saline solution. Sci Rep 4:5005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lesich KA, de Pinho TG, Dang L, Lindemann CB (2014) Ultrastructural evidence that motility changes caused by variations in ATP, Mg2+, and ADP correlate to conformational changes in reactivated bull sperm axonemes. Cytoskeleton 71:649–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yu TS, Lauga E, Hosoi AE (2006) Experimental investigations of elastic tail propulsion at low Reynolds number. Phys Fluids 18:091701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gadelha H (2013) On the optimal shape of magnetic swimmers. Regular Chaotic Dynamics 18:75–84

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Friedrich BM, Riedel-Kruse IH, Howard J, Jülicher F (2010) High-precision tracking of sperm swimming fine structure provides strong test of resistive force theory. J Exp Biol 213:1226–1234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rodenborna B, Chena C-H, Swinneya HL, Liub B, Zhang HP (2013) Propulsion of microorganisms by a helical flagellum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:E338–E347

    Google Scholar 

  27. Magdanz V, Khalil ISM, Simmchen J, Furtado GP, Mohanty S, Gebauer J, Xu H, Klingner A, Aziz A, Medina-Sánchez M, Schmidt OG, Misra S (2020) IRONSperm: sperm-templated soft magnetic microrobots. Sci Adv 6:eaba5855

Download references

Funding

V. M. acknowledges the La Caixa Foundation (grant 100010434) for funding. This work was supported by the Faculty of Engineering Technology, University of Twente, under Grant Crazy-Research-2022.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

V.M. conducted the biological study on spermatozoa and magnetically functionalized sperm. AK, LA and IK created the mathematical model of IRONSperm of different bending stiffness. AK, IK and VM prepared the figures. All authors wrote and reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Veronika Magdanz or Islam S. M. Khalil.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial or personal interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Magdanz, V., Klingner, A., Abelmann, L. et al. IRONSperm swimming by rigid-body rotation versus transverse bending waves influenced by cell membrane charge. J Micro-Bio Robot 18, 49–60 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12213-023-00158-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12213-023-00158-5

Keywords

Navigation