Skip to main content
Log in

Experiments and open-loop control of multiple catalytic microrobots

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Micro-Bio Robotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ability to direct microrobots in the low Reynolds number regime has broad applications in engineering, biology and medicine. In contrast to externally driven robots, catalytically driven microrobots utilize chemical reactions to hyphenate all instances in solution. Controlling multiple self propelled microrobots in the same workspace has been an ongoing challenge for the field. In this paper we present a novel method for open loop control of multiple microrobots in the same workspace by combining their catalytic actuation with magnetic actuation. By using a catalytic cap to regulate the directions of motion and leveraging the inherent variations in model parameters in a collection of paramagnetic microrobots, we show how collective motion patterns can be achieved. We validate our proposed strategy in simulations using a simple kinematic model of each robot, and in experiments. Our results suggest that simultaneous steering of multiple microrobots to arbitrary locations might be controllable using sophisticated control techniques such as ensemble control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Duan W, Wang W, Das S, Yadav V, Mallouk TE, Sen A (2015) Synthetic nano- and micromachines in analytical chemistry: sensing, migration, capture, delivery, and separation. Annual Rev Anal Chem (Palo Alto Calif.) 8:311–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Solovev AA, Xi W, Gracias DH, Harazim SM, Deneke C, Sanchez S, Schmidt OG (2012) Self-propelled nanotools. ACS Nano 6(2):1751–1756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sanchez S, Solovev AA, Harazim SM, Schmidt OG (2011) Microbots swimming in the flowing streams of microfluidic channels. J Am Chem Soc 133(4):701–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dey KK, Das S, Poyton MF, Sengupta S, Butler PJ, Cremer PS, Sen A (2014) Chemotactic separation of enzymes. ACS Nano 8(12):11941–11949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tottori S, Zhang L, Qiu F, Krawczyk KK, Franco-Obregȯn A, Nelson BJ (2012) Magnetic helical micromachines: fabrication, controlled swimming, and cargo transport. Advan Mater (Deerfield Beach Fla) 24(6):811–816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang J (2012) Cargo-towing synthetic nanomachines: towards active transport in microchip devices. Lab on a Chip 12(11):1944–1950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chang ST, Paunov VN, Petsev DN, Velev OD (2007) Remotely powered self-propelling particles and micropumps based on miniature diodes. Nature Mater 6(3):235–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang W, Li S, Mair L, Ahmed S, Huang TJ, Mallouk TE (2014) Acoustic propulsion of nanorod motors inside living cells. Angewandte Chemie (International ed in English) 53(12):3201–3204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang W, Duan W, Ahmed S, Sen A, Mallouk TE (2015) From one to many: dynamic assembly and collective behavior of self-propelled colloidal motors. Accounts Chem Res 48(7):1938–1946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang W, Duan W, Ahmed S, Mallouk TE, Sen A (2013) Small power: autonomous nano- and micromotors propelled by self-generated gradients. Nano Today 8(5):531–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jiang H-R, Yoshinaga N, Sano M (2010) Active motion of a Janus particle by self-thermophoresis in a defocused laser beam. Phys Rev Lett 105(26):268302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang L, Abbott JJ, Dong L, Kratochvil BE, Bell D, Nelson BJ (2009) Artificial bacterial flagella: fabrication and magnetic control. Appl Phys Lett 94(6):064107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Evans BA, Shields AR, Carroll RL, Washburn S, Falvo MR, Superfine R (2007) Magnetically actuated nanorod arrays as biomimetic cilia. Nano Lett 7(5):1428–1434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Magdanz V, Sanchez S, Schmidt OG (2013) Development of a sperm-flagella driven micro-bio-robot. Adv Mater 25(45):6581–6588. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201302544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Purcell E (1977) Life at low reynolds number. Am J Phys 45(1):3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gao W, Pei A, Dong R, Wang J (2014) Catalytic iridium-based Janus micromotors powered by ultralow levels of chemical fuels. J Am Chem Soc 136(6):2276–2279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Honda T, Arai K, Ishiyama K (1996) Micro swimming mechanisms propelled by external magnetic fields. IEEE Trans Magn 32(5):5085–5087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Carlsen RW, Edwards MR, Zhuang J, Pacoret C, Sitti M (2014) Magnetic steering control of multi-cellular bio-hybrid microswimmers. Lab Chip 14:3850–3859. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4LC00707G

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Palacci J, Sacanna S, Steinberg AP, Pine DJ, Chaikin PM (2013) Living crystals of light-activated colloidal surfers. Science 339(6122):936–940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sia SK, Whitesides GM (2003) Microfluidic devices fabricated in poly(dimethylsiloxane) for biological studies. Electrophoresis 24(21):3563–3576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kline TR, Paxton WF, Mallouk TE, Sen A (2005) Catalytic nanomotors: remote-controlled autonomous movement of striped metallic nanorods. Angewandte Chemie (International ed in English) 44(5):744–746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mirkovic T, Zacharia NS, Scholes GD, Ozin GA (2010) Nanolocomotion - catalytic nanomotors and nanorotors. Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse Germany) 6(2):159–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gao W, Feng X, Pei A, Gu Y, Li J, Wang J (2013) Seawater-driven magnesium based Janus micromotors for environmental remediation. Nanoscale 5(11):4696–4700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sundararajan S, Lammert PE, Zudans AW, Crespi VH, Sen A (2008) Catalytic motors for transport of colloidal cargo. Nano Lett 8(5):1271–1276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lee K, Yi Y, Yu Y (2016) Remote control of t cell activation using magnetic janus particles. Angew Chem Int Ed 55(26):7384–7387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ng AHC, Choi K, Luoma RP, Robinson JM, Wheeler AR (2012) Digital microfluidic magnetic separation for particle-based immunoassays. Anal Chem 84(20):8805–8812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Khalil ISM, Magdanz V, Sanchez S, Schmidt OG, Misra S (2015) Precise localization and control of catalytic janus micromotors using weak magnetic fields. Int J Adv Robot Syst 12(1):2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rikken RSM, Nolte RJM, Maan JC, van Hest JCM, Wilson DA, Christianen PCM (2014) Manipulation of micro- and nanostructure motion with magnetic fields. Soft Matter 10:1295–1308. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3SM52294F

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Huang W, Manjare M, Zhao Y (2013) Catalytic nanoshell micromotors. J Phys Chem C 117 (41):21590–21596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Diller E, Giltinan J, Sitti M (2013) Independent control of multiple magnetic microrobots in three dimensions. Int J Robot Res

  31. Donald B, Levey C, Paprotny I (2008) Planar microassembly by parallel actuation of MEMS microrobots. J Microelectromech Syst 17(4):789–808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Das S, Steager EB, Stebe KJ, Kumar V (2017) Simultaneous control of spherical microrobots using catalytic and magnetic actuation. In: International conference on manipulation, automation and robotics at small scales (MARSS). IEEE, p 2017

  33. Das S, Garg A, Campbell AI, Howse J, Sen A, Velegol D, Golestanian R, Ebbens SJ (2015) Boundaries can steer active Janus spheres. Nat Commun 6:8999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Baraban L, Tasinkevych M, Popescu MN, Sanchez S, Dietrich S, Schmidt OG (2012) Transport of cargo by catalytic janus micro-motors. Soft Matter 8:48–52. https://doi.org/10.1039/C1SM06512B

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Brown A, Poon W (2014) Ionic effects in self-propelled pt-coated janus swimmers. Soft Matter 10 (22):4016–4027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Gregory DA, Campbell AI, Ebbens SJ (2015) Effect of catalyst distribution on spherical bubble swimmer trajectories. J Phys Chem C 119(27):15339–15348. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b03773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Das S, Shklyaev OE, Altemose A, Shum H, Ortiz-Rivera I, Valdez L, Mallouk TE, Balazs AC, Sen A (2017) Harnessing catalytic pumps for directional delivery of microparticles in microchambers. Nat Commun 8:14384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Li JS, Khaneja N (2006) Ensemble controllability of the bloch equations. In: Proceedings of the 45th IEEE conference on decision and control, pp 2483–2487

  39. Li J-S, Khaneja N (2007) Ensemble control of linear systems. In: 2007 46th IEEE conference on decision and control, pp 3768–3773

  40. Qi J, Zlotnik A, Li JS (2013) Optimal ensemble control of stochastic linear systems. In: 52nd IEEE conference on decision and control, pp 3091–3096

  41. Qi J, Li JS (2013) Ensemble controllability of time-invariant linear systems. In: 52nd IEEE conference on decision and control, pp 2709–2714

  42. Bretl T (2007) Control of many agents using few instructions. In: Proceedings of the robotics: science and systems. Jeju, Korea, vol 6, p 2007

  43. Chan HB, Dykman M, Stambaugh C (2008) Switching-path distribution in multidimensional systems. Phys Rev E 78:051109. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.78.051109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Schwartz IB, Billings L, Dykman M, Landsman A (2009) Predicting extinction rates in stochastic epidemic models. J Stat Mech: Theory Exper 2009(01):P01005. [Online]. Available: http://stacks.iop.org/1742-5468/2009/i=01/a=P01005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Wang F, Pauletti GM, Wang J, Zhang J, Ewing RC, Wang Y, Shi D (2013) Dual surface-functionalized janus nanocomposites of polystyrene/fe3o4@sio2 for simultaneous tumor cell targeting and stimulus-induced drug release. Adv Mater 25(25):3485–3489. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201301376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Yi Y, Sanchez L, Gao Y, Yu Y (2016) Janus particles for biological imaging and sensing. Analyst 141:3526–3539. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6AN00325G

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Manjare M, Yang B, Zhao Y-P (2012) Bubble driven quasioscillatory translational motion of catalytic micromotors. Phys Rev Lett 109:128305. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.128305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Wang S, Wu N (2014) Selecting the swimming mechanisms of colloidal particles: Bubble propulsion versus self-diffusiophoresis. Langmuir 30(12):3477–3486. pMID: 24593832. https://doi.org/10.1021/la500182f

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Valadares LF, Tao Y-G, Zacharia NS, Kitaev V, Galembeck F, Kapral R, Ozin GA (2010) Catalytic nanomotors: self-propelled sphere dimers. Small 6(4):565–572. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.200901976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Ebbens SJ, Howse JR (2011) Direct observation of the direction of motion for spherical catalytic swimmers. Langmuir 27(20):12293–12296. pMID: 21928845. https://doi.org/10.1021/la2033127

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the support of ONR grant N00014-11-1-0725, NSF grant CNS-1446592, GAANN grant P200A120246, NSF DMR 1607878 and MRSEC grant DMR11-20901.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sambeeta Das.

Electronic supplementary material

Appendix

Appendix

We have addressed the particle propulsion mechanism by reviewing the relevant literature, which indicates that self diffusiophoresis and electrophoresis are both contributing to the particle migration.

The Janus Pt-Ps particles used in this study have been extensively studied as a model system for catalytically propelled active particles. In hydrogen peroxide solution the platinum cap catalyzes the decomposition of hydrogen peroxide into water and oxygen while the polystyrene cap remains inert. There are four propulsion mechanisms that have been explored in the literature for this system. These include bubble propulsion, self-diffusiophoresis, iontophoresis, and electrophoresis.

Bubble propulsion has been discounted as a possible mechanism due to the lack of microscopic bubbles in solution, as confirmed through microscopy. However, for larger Janus particles (> 20 \(\mu \)m) and microtubules, bubble propulsion has indeed been reported [47, 48]

Examinations of self-diffusiophoresis as a mechanism show that it alone cannot explain the particle motion in catalytically driven systems. Self-diffusiophoresis relies on an asymmetrical solute gradient in the vicinity of the particle that is established by the generation of water and oxygen on the particle’s platinum side. Self-diffusiophoresis is likely present, but cannot account for all observed behaviors for catalytically driven Janus particles. For example, catalytic Janus swimmers that move owing to reactions with small platinum domains or small hematite domains have been observed to move toward the catalytic face, [19, 49] while the Pt-Ps system (as studied in this manuscript) always moves toward the inert [50] face. Furthermore, the system responds to added salts in a manner inconsistent with a purely self-diffusiophoretic mechanism. The system has been studied in the presence of neutral salts, i.e. that do not alter pH, for concentrations ranging from 10− 5 mM to 1 mM, [19, 35]. These salts reduce the swimming speed of Janus swimmers, as would be expected for smaller Debye lengths and compression of the diffusiophoretic cloud behind the reactive cap. However, the reduction in speed is roughly 5 times more than that can be explained by changes in the Debye length; this reduction cannot be explained by restructuring of the ion cloud in the vicinity of the surface as well, as particles in bulk and near the surface alike have similar dynamics.

Self-iontophoresis alone cannot account for this migration, either. When base is added to the system, the OH- can remove the free protons [35], altering the ion cloud. However, upon the addition of base, the speed does not decrease strongly.

Surface charge on the Janus particle faces plays a strong role in the migration behavior, suggesting that electrophoresis is the dominant mechanism. Anionic surfactant (CTAB) [35] adsorbs on the Ps face. As concentration increases, it can neutralize that face, eventually reversing its charge. Upon addition of CTAB, the speed of the particle decreases. Beyond the threshold concentration for charge reversal, the motion reverses, and particles move toward their reactive caps. This suggests that electrophoresis plays a major role in the mechanism of self-propulsion.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Das, S., Steager, E.B., Hsieh, M.A. et al. Experiments and open-loop control of multiple catalytic microrobots. J Micro-Bio Robot 14, 25–34 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12213-018-0106-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12213-018-0106-1

Keywords

Navigation