Rendiconti Lincei. Scienze Fisiche e Naturali

, Volume 29, Issue 3, pp 639–647 | Cite as

Environmental changes near the Mekong Delta in Vietnam using remote sensing

  • Bijeesh Kozhikkodan Veettil
  • Ngo Xuan Quang


This study is an attempt to use satellite imagery for the assessment of environmental changes near the Ba Lai River, Mekong Delta, in Vietnam. Landsat imagery was used to calculate water quality variables as well as land cover changes near Ba Lai River, both before and after the construction of an irrigation dam in 2002. A lot of changes in land use and land cover were observed in this area since the construction of the Ba Lai dam, particularly in the agricultural practice such as rotational plantation of rice and other crops. The present study stated that water quality has decreased and became polluted with organic materials between 1988 and 2006. Water quality variables such as chlorophyll (algae), nitrogen, and phosphorus were highly increased, whereas turbidity levels have slightly increased since the dam construction, possibly due to alluvial silty deposition.


Ba Lai River Ecosystem Landsat Mekong delta Water quality variables 



Bijeesh Kozhikkodan Veettil acknowledges Department for Management of Science and Technology Development (DEMASTED), Ton Duc Thang University, Vietnam, for research support. We would like to acknowledge the United States Geological Survey (USGS) for Landsat data.


  1. Affan MA, Touliabah HE, Al-Harbi SM, Abdulwassi NI, Turki AJ, Haque MM, Khan S, Elbassat RA (2016) Influence of environmental parameters on toxic cyanobacterial bloom occurrence in a Lake of Bangladesh. Rend Fis Acc Lincei 27:473–481. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alrababah MA, Alhamad MN (2006) Land use/cover classification of arid and semi-arid Mediterranean landscapes using Landsat ETM. Int J Remote Sens 27:2703–2718. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bahadur KC (2009) Improving Landsat and IRS image classification: evaluation of unsupervised and supervised classification through band ratios and DEM in a mountainous landscape in Nepal. Remote Sens 1:1257–1272. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balica SF, Douben N, Wright NG (2009) Flood vulnerability indices at varying spatial scales. Water Sci Technol 60:2571–2580. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Balica SF, Wright NG, van der Meulen F (2012) A flood vulnerability index for coastal cities and its use in assessing climate change impacts. Nat Hazards 64:73–105. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bilotta GS, Brazier RE (2008) Understanding the influence of suspended solids on water quality and aquatic biota. Water Res 42:2849–2861. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Borghuis AM, Chang K, Lee HY (2007) Comparison between automated and manual mapping of typhoon-triggered landslides from SPOT-5 imagery. Int J Remote Sens 28:1843–1856. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Campbell JB, Wynne RH (2011) Introduction to remote sensing, 5th edn. The Guilford Press, New York, p 667Google Scholar
  9. El-Sheekh MM, Farghl AA, Galal HR, Bayoumi HS (2016) Bioremediation of different types of polluted water using microalgae. Rend Fis Acc Lincei 27:401–410. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gholizadath MH, Melesse AM, Lakshmi R (2016) A comprehensive review on water quality parameters using remote sensing techniques. Sensors 16:1298. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. He W, Chen S, Liu X, Chen J (2008) Water quality monitoring in slightly-polluted inland water body through remote sensing—a case study in Guanting reservoir, Beijing, China. Front Environ Sci Eng China 2:163–171. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Heege T, Kiselev V, Wettle M, Hung NN (2014) Operational multi-sensor monitoring of turbidity for the entire Mekong Delta. Int J Remote Sens 35:2910–2926. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Institute of Meteorology, Hydrology and Environment (IMHEN) (2010) Sea level rise scenarios and possible disaster risk reduction in Viet Nam, pp 24–25Google Scholar
  14. IPCC (2007) Climate change, impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) Intergovernmental panel on climate change (IPCC). Cambridge University Press, New York, p 987Google Scholar
  15. IPCC (Intergovernmental panel on climate change) (2001) Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 94Google Scholar
  16. Mohammed AS, Rusthum S (2008) Advance land use/land cover classification using high resolution IRS imagery for the analysis of urban structure. Int J Appl Eng Res 3:1495–1506Google Scholar
  17. MONRE (2009) Climate change, sea level rise scenarios for Viet Nam. Technical report. Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment, Hanoi, p 34Google Scholar
  18. Mukherjee S, Mukherjee P (2009) Assessment and comparison of classification techniques for forest inventory estimation: a case study using IRS-ID imagery. Int J Geoinf 5:63–73Google Scholar
  19. Peacock R (2014) Accuracy assessment of supervised and unsupervised classification using Landsat imagery of Little Rock, Arkansas. MSc Dissertation, Northwest Missouri State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  20. Potapova M, Charles DF (2005) Choice of substrate in algae-based water-quality assessment. J N Am Benthol Soc 24:415–427. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Seyhan E, Decker A (1986) Application of remote sensing techniques for water quality monitoring. Hydrol Bull 20:41–50. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Slonecker ET, Jones DK, Pellerin BA (2016) The new Landsat 8 potential for remote sensing of colored dissolved organic matter (CDOM). Mar Pollut Bull 107:518–527. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Thomson G, Fuller RM, Eastwood JA (1998) Supervised versus unsupervised methods for classification of coasts and river corridors from airborne remote sensing. Int J Remote Sens 19:3423–3431. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Trisurat Y, Eiumnoh A, Murai S, Hussain MZ, Shrestha RP (2000) Improvement of tropical vegetation mapping using a remote sensing technique: a case study of Khao Yai National Park, Thailand. Int J Remote Sens 10:2031–2042. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tuan LA, Du LV, Skinner T (2012) Rapid integrated and ecosystem-based assessment of climate change vulnerability and adaptation for Ben Tre province, Vietnam. World Wildlife Fund for Nature (WWF), Hanoi, VietnamGoogle Scholar
  26. Veettil BK, Bianchini N (2014) A remote sensing approach for monitoring seasonal variations in the water quality of Lake Guaiba, Southern Brazil. Recent Trends Civil Eng Technol 4:1–12Google Scholar
  27. Wang Y, Xia H, Fu J, Sheng G (2004) Water quality change in reservoirs of Shenzhen, China: detection using LANDSAT/TM data. Sci Total Environ 328:195–206. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zheng Z, Li Y, Guo Y, Liu G, Du C (2015) Landsat-based long-term monitoring of total suspended matter concentration patter change in the west season for Dongting Lake, China. Remote Sens 7:13975–13999. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department for Management of Science and Technology DevelopmentTon Duc Thang UniversityHo Chi Minh CityVietnam
  2. 2.Faculty of Environment and Labour SafetyTon Duc Thang UniversityHo Chi Minh CityVietnam
  3. 3.Department of Environmental Management and Technology, Institute of Tropical Biology (ITB)Vietnam Academy of Science and TechnologyHo Chi Minh CityVietnam
  4. 4.Graduate University of Science and Technology, Vietnam Academy of Science and TechnologyHanoiVietnam

Personalised recommendations