Abstract
Neuroaesthetics is a growing field of research concerned with the biological foundations of aesthetic experiences and artistic activities. In this paper we trace the major milestones in the history of neuroaesthetics, from British Empiricism to current neuroimaging studies, emphasizing the continuity of certain basic assumptions and controversies. Thereafter we turn to an issue that has received attention only recently: differences between men and women in the neural underpinnings of aesthetic preference. We argue that the combination of neuroimaging techniques and evolutionary reasoning affords the possibility of an integral understanding of the biological foundations of aesthetic experiences. Finally, we summarize some challenges neuroaesthetics will have to face in the future.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alajouanine T (1948) Aphasia and artistic realization. Brain 71:229–241
Allen G (1877) Physiological aesthetics. Henry S. King & Co., London
Ambrose SH (2001) Paleolithic technology and human evolution. Science 291:1748–1753
Amunts K, Armstrong E, Malikovic A, Hömke L, Mohlberg H, Schleicher A, Zilles K (2007) Gender-specific left–right asymmetries in human visual cortex. J Neurosci 27:1356–1364
Anderson RL (1989) Art in small-scale societies, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Appenzeller T (1998) Art: evolution or revolution? Science 282:1451–1454
Azim E, Mobbs D, Jo B, Menon V, Reiss AL (2005) Sex differences in brain activation elicited by humor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:16496–16501
Baciu M, Koenig O, Vernier M-P, Bedoin N, Rubin C, Segebarth C (1999) Categorical and coordinate spatial relations: fMRI evidence for hemispheric specialization. NeuroReport 10:1373–1378
Bar M, Neta M (2007) Visual elements of subjective preference modulate amygdala activation. Neuropsychologia 45:2191–2200
Barton RA (2006) Primate brain evolution: integrating comparative, neurophysiological, and ethological data. Evol Anthropol 15:224–236
Bar-Yosef Mayer DE, Vandermeersch B, Bar-Yosef O (2009) Shells and ochre in Middle Paleolithic Qafzeh Cave, Israel: indications for modern behavior. J Hum Evol 56:307–314
Bäzner H, Hennerici M (2006) Stroke in painters. In: Rose FC (ed) The neurobiology of painting. Int Rev Neurobiol, vol 74. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 165–191
Bednarik RG (1995) Concept-mediated marking in the lower paleolithic. Curr Anthropol 36:605–634
Bednarik RG (2003) A figurine from the African Acheulian. Curr Anthropol 44:405–413
Bell EC, Willson MC, Wilman AH, Dave S, Silverstone PH (2006) Males and females differ in brain activation during cognitive tasks. Neuroimage 30:529–538
Berlyne DE (1963) Complexity and incongruity variables as determinants of exploratory choice and evaluative ratings. Can J Psychol 17:274–290
Berlyne DE (1970) Novelty, complexity, and hedonic value. Percept Psychophys 8:279–286
Berlyne DE (1971) Aesthetics and psychobiology. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York
Berlyne DE, Ogilvie JC, Parham LCC (1968) The dimensionality of visual complexity, interestingness, and pleasingness. Can J Psychol 22:376–387
Berry JW (1968) Ecology, perceptual development and the Mueller-Lyer illusion. Brit J Psychol 59:205–210
Blood AJ, Zatorre RJ (2001) Intensely pleasurable responses to music correlate with activity in brain regions implicated in reward and emotion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:11818–11823
Blood AJ, Zatorre RJ, Bermudez P, Evans AC (1999) Emotional responses to pleasant and unpleasant music correlate with activity in paralimbic brain regions. Nat Neurosci 2:382–387
Boghi A, Rasetti R, Avidano F, Manzone C, Orsi L, D’Agata F, Caroppo P, Bergui M, Rocca P, Pulvirenti L, Bradac GB, Bogetto F, Mutani R, Mortara P (2006) The effect of gender on planning: an fMRI study using the Tower of London task. Neuroimage 33:999–1010
Bogousslavsky J (2005) Artistic creativity, style and brain disorders. Eur Neurol 54:103–111
Bogousslavsky J, Boller F (eds) (2005) Neurological disorders in famous artists. Frontiers of Neurology and Neuroscience, vol 19. Krager, Basel
Bouzouggar A, Barton N, Vanhaeren M, d’Errico F, Collcutt S, Higham T, Hodge E, Parfitt S, Rhodes E, Schwenninger J-L, Stringer C, Turner E, Ward S, Moutmir A, Stambouli A (2007) 82,000-year-old shell beads from North Africa and implications for the origins of modern human behaviour. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:9964–9969
Bromberger B, Sternschein R, Widick P, Smith W II, Chatterjee A (2011) The right hemisphere in esthetic perception. Front Hum Neurosci 5:109. doi:110.3389/fnhum.2011.00109
Brown S, Martinez MJ, Parsons LM (2004) Passive music listening spontaneously engages limbic and paralimbic systems. NeuroReport 15:2033–2037
Bruner J (1983) In search of mind. Essays in autobiography. Harper and Row, New York
Bruner E, Manzi G, Arsuaga JL (2003) Encephalization and allometric trajectories in the genus Homo: evidence from the Neandertal and modern lineages. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:15335–15340
Burke E (1757) A philosophical enquiry into the origin of our ideas of the sublime and the beautiful. Dodsley, London
Cahill L (2006) Why sex matters for neuroscience. Nat Rev Neurosci 7:477–484
Calvo-Merino B, Jola C, Glaser DE, Haggard P (2008) Towards a sensorimotor aesthetics of performing art. Conscious Cogn 17:911–922
Calvo-Merino B, Urgesi C, Orgs G, Aglioti SM, Haggard P (2010) Extrastriate body area underlies aesthetic evaluation of body stimuli. Exp Brain Res 204:447–456
Carroll N (2008) Aesthetic experience, art and artists. In: Shusterman R, Tomlin A (eds) Aesthetic experience. Routledge, New York, pp 145–165
Cela-Conde CJ, Ayala FJ (2007) Human evolution. Trails from the past. Oxford University Press, New York
Cela-Conde CJ, Marty G, Maestú F, Ortiz T, Munar E, Fernández A, Roca M, Rosselló J, Quesney F (2004) Activation of the prefrontal cortex in the human visual aesthetic perception. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:6321–6325
Cela-Conde CJ, Ayala FJ, Munar E, Maestú F, Nadal M, Capó MA, del Río D, López-Ibor JJ, Ortiz T, Mirasso C, Marty G (2009) Sex-related similarities and differences in the neural correlates of beauty. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:3847–3852
Cela-Conde CJ, Agnati L, Huston JP, Mora F, Nadal M (2011) The neural foundations of aesthetic appreciation. Prog Neurobiol 94:39–48
Chabris CF, Kosslyn SM (1998) How do the cerebral hemispheres contribute to encoding spatial relations? Curr Dir Psychol Sci 7:8–14
Changeux J-P (1994) Art and neuroscience. Leonardo 27:189–201
Chatterjee A (2004a) Prospects for a cognitive neuroscience of visual aesthetics. Bull Psychol Arts 4:55–60
Chatterjee A (2004b) The neuropsychology of visual artistic production. Neuropsychologia 42:1568–1583
Chatterjee A (2006) The neuropsychology of visual art: conferring capacity. Int Rev Neurobiol 74:39–49
Chatterjee A (2011) Neuroaesthetics: a coming of age story. J Cogn Neurosci 23:53–62
Chatterjee A, Widick P, Sternschein R, Smith WB II, Bromberger B (2010) The assessment of art attributes. Emp Stud Arts 28:207–222
Chatterjee A, Bromberger B, Smith WB II, Sternschein R, Widick P (2011) Artistic production following brain damage: a study of three artists. Leonardo 55:405–410
Cupchik GC (1986) A decade after Berlyne. New directions in experimental aesthetics. Poetics 15:345–369
Cupchik GC, Vartanian O, Crawley A, Mikulis DJ (2009) Viewing artworks: contributions of cognitive control and perceptual facilitation to aesthetic experience. Brain Cogn 70:84–91
d’Errico F, Henshilwood C, Vanhaerend M, van Niekerk K (2005) Nassarius kraussianus shell beads from Blombos Cave: evidence for symbolic behaviour in the Middle Stone Age. J Hum Evol 48:3–24
Davis CM (1970) Education and susceptibility to the Muller-Lyer illusion among the Banyankole. J Soc Psychol 82:25–34
Dewey J (1934) Art as experience. Minton, Balch and Company, New York
Di Dio C, Macaluso E, Rizzolatti G (2007) The golden beauty: brain response to classical and renaissance sculptures. PLoS ONE 11:e1201
Dupré E, Nathan M (1911) Le langage musical: Étude médico-psychologique. Maisons Félix Alcan et Guillaumin Réunies, Paris
Fechner GT (1865) Über die Frage des golden Schnitts. Archiv für die zeichnenden Künste 11:100–112
Fechner GT (1876) Vorschule der Ästhetik. Breitkopf und Härtel, Leipzig
Frumkin RM (1963) Sex, familiarity, and dogmatism as factors in painting preferences. Percept Motor Skill 17:12
Furnham A, Walker J (2001) The influence of personality traits, previous experience of art, and demographic variables on artistic preference. Pers Indiv Differ 31:997–1017
Gabora L (2005) Mind: What archaeology can tell us about the origins of human cognition. In: Bentley A, Maschner H (eds) Handbook of theories and methods in archaeology. Altamira Press, Walnut Creek, pp 283–296
Gosselin N, Peretz I, Johnsen E, Adolphs R (2007) Amygdala damage impairs emotion recognition from music. Neuropsychologia 45:236–244
Gourevitch G (1967) Un aphasique s’exprime par le dessin. Encephale 56:52–68
Green CD (1995) All that glitters: a review of psychological research on the aesthetics of the golden section. Perception 24:937–968
Haier RJ, Jung RE, Yeo RA, Head K, Alkire MT (2005) The neuroanatomy of general intelligence: sex matters. Neuroimage 25:320–327
Hugdahl K, Thomsen T, Ersland L (2006) Sex differences in visuo-spatial processing: an fMRI study of mental rotation. Neuropsychologia 44:1575–1583
Humphrey NK (1973) The illusion of beauty. Perception 2:429
Jacobsen T, Schubotz RI, Höfel L, von Cramon DY (2006) Brain correlates of aesthetic judgment of beauty. Neuroimage 29:276–285
Jager J, Postma A (2003) On the hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate spatial relations: a review of the current evidence. Neuropsychologia 41:504–515
Kant I (1790/1892) Critique of judgment. Macmillan and Co., London
Kawabata H, Zeki S (2004) Neural correlates of beauty. J Neurophysiol 91:1699–1705
Kirk U, Skov M, Christensen MS, Nygaard N (2009a) Brain correlates of aesthetic expertise: a parametric fMRI study. Brain Cogn 69:306–315
Kirk U, Skov M, Hulme O, Christensen MS, Zeki S (2009b) Modulation of aesthetic value by semantic context: an fMRI study. Neuroimage 44:1125–1132
Koelsch S, Fritz T, von Cramon DY, Müller K, Friederici AD (2006) Investigating emotion with music: an fMRI study. Hum Brain Mapp 27:239–250
Koffka K (1940) Problems in the psychology of art. In: Art: A Bryn Mawr symposium. Bryn Mawr Notes and monographs IX. Bryn Mawr College, Bryn Mawr, PA, pp 179–273
Kosslyn SM (1987) Seeing and imagining in the cerebral hemisphere: a computational approach. Psychol Rev 94:148–175
Kosslyn SM, Alpert NM, Thompson WL, Chabris CF, Rauch SL, Anderson AK (1994) Identifying objects seen from different viewpoints. A PET investigation. Brain 117:1055–1071
Leder H, Belke B, Oeberst A, Augustin D (2004) A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. Br J Psychol 95:489–508
Lengger PG, Fischmeister FPS, Leder H, Bauer H (2007) Functional neuroanatomy of the perception of modern art: a DC-EEG study on the influence of stylistic information on aesthetic experience. Brain Res 1158:93–102
Lewis EO (1908) The effect of practice on the perception of the Müller-Lyer illusion. Br J Psychol 2:294–306
Luria AR, Tsvetkova LS, Futer DS (1965) Aphasia in a composer (V. G. Shebalin). J Neurol Sci 2:288–292
Marshack A (1996) A middle paleolithic symbolic composition from the Golan Heights: the earliest known depictive image. Curr Anthropol 37:357–365
Marshall HR (1892) The field of aesthetics psychologically considered II: the differentiation of aesthetics from hedonics. Mind 1:453–469
Marshall HR (1893) Hedonic aesthetics. Mind 2:15–41
Mellars P (2006) Why did modern human populations disperse from Africa ca. 60,000 years ago? A new model. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:9381–9386
Miller G (2000) The mating mind. How sexual choice shaped the evolution of human nature. Doubleday, London
Miller GF (2001) Aesthetic fitness: how sexual selection shaped artistic virtuosity as a fitness indicator and aesthetic preferences as mate choice criteria. Bull Psychol Arts 2:20–25
Miller BL, Hou CE (2004) Portraits of artists. Emergence of visual creativity in dementia. Arch Neurol 61:842–844
Mitterschiffthaler MT, Fu CHY, Dalton JA, Andrew CM, Williams SCR (2007) A functional MRI study of happy and sad affective states induced by classical music. Hum Brain Mapp 28:1150–1162
Moore G (2002) Art and evolution: nietzsche’s physiological aesthetics. Br J Hist Phil 10:109–126
Mountjoy PT (1958) Effects of exposure time and intertrial interval upon decrement to the Müller-Lyer illusion. J Exp Psychol 56:97–102
Nadal M, Pearce MT (2011) The copenhagen neuroaesthetics conference: prospects and pitfalls for an emerging field. Brain Cogn 76:172–183
Neisser U (1967) Cognitive psychology. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Okubo M, Michimata C (2004) The role of high spatial frequencies in hemispheric processing of categorical and coordinate spatial relations. J Cogn Neurosci 16:1576–1582
Orban GA, Van Essen D, Vanduffel W (2004) Comparative mapping of higher visual areas in monkeys and humans. Trends Cogn Sci 8:315–324
Padovan R (1999) Proportion: science, philosophy, architecture. Taylor and Francis, London
Pedersen DM, Wheeler J (1983) The Müller-Lyer illusion among Navajos. J Soc Psychol 121:3–6
Piefke M, Weiss PH, Markowitsch HJ, Fink GR (2005) Gender differences in the functional neuroanatomy of emotional episodic autobiographical memory. Hum Brain Mapp 24:313–324
Pinter R, Anderson MM (1916) The Müller-Lyer illusion with children and adults. J Exp Psychol 1:200–221
Polzella DJ (2000) Differences in reactions to paintings by male and female college students. Percept Motor Skill 91:251–258
Preuss TM, Coleman GQ (2002) Human-specific organization of primary visual cortex: alternating compartments of dense Cat-301 and calbindin immunoreactivity in layer 4A. Cereb Cortex 12:671–691
Price U (1810) Essays on the picturesque, as compared with the sublime and the beautiful; and, on the use of studying pictures, for the purpose of improving real landscape, vol 1. J. Mawman, London
Ramachandran VS, Hirstein W (1999) The science of art: a neurological theory of aesthetic experience. J Conscious Stud 6:15–51
Salimpoor VN, Benovoy M, Larcher K, Dagher A, Zatorre RJ (2011) Anatomically distinct dopamine release during anticipation and experience of peak emotion to music. Nat Neurosci (in press). doi:10.1038/nn.2726
Schiano DJ, Jordan K (1990) Mueller-Lyer decrement: practice or prolonged inspection? Perception 19:307–316
Segall M, Campbell D, Herskovits MJ (1966) The influence of culture on visual perception. The Bobbs-Merrill Company, New York
Shiner L (2001) The invention of art: a cultural history. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Shusterman R, Tomlin A (eds) (2008) Aesthetic experience. Routledge, New York
Silverman I, Eals M (1992) Sex differences in spatial abilities: evolutionary theory and data. In: Barkow J, Cosmides L, Tooby J (eds) The adapted mind. Oxford Univ Press, New York, pp 487–503
Silverman I, Choi J, Mackewn A, Fisher M, Moro J, Olshansky E (2000) Evolved mechanisms underlying way finding: further studies on the hunter-gatherer theory of spatial sex differences. Evol Hum Behav 21:201–213
Silverman I, Choi J, Peters M (2007) The hunter-gatherer theory of sex differences in spatial abilities: data from 40 countries. Arch Sex Behav 36:261–268
Skov M, Vartanian O (2009) Introduction: what is neuroaesthetics. In: Skov M, Vartanian O (eds) neuroaesthetics. Baywood, Amityville, pp 1–7
Souques A, Baruk H (1930) Autopsie d’un cas d’amusie (avec aphasie) chez un professeur de piano. Rev Neurol 1:545–556
Tatarkiewicz W (1963) Objectivity and subjectivity in the history of aesthetics. Phil Phenom Res 24:157–173
Terhune KP, Liu GT, Modestino EJ, Miki A, Sheth KN, Liu C-SJ, Bonhomme GR, Haselgrove JC (2005) Recognition of objects in non-canonical views: a functional MRI study. J Neuro-Ophthalmol 25:273–279
Texier P-J, Porraz G, Parkington J, Rigaud J-P, Poggenpoel C, Miller C, Tribolo C, Cartwright C, Coudenneau A, Klein R, Steele T, Verna C (2010) A Howiesons Poort tradition of engraving ostrich eggshell containers dated to 60,000 years ago at Diepkloof Rock Shelter, South Africa. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:6180–6185
Van Damme W (1996) Beauty in context. Towards an anthropological approach to aesthetics. Brill, Leiden
Vartanian O, Goel V (2004) Neuroanatomical correlates of aesthetic preference for paintings. NeuroReport 15:893–897
Webb D (1769) Observations on the correspondence between poetry and music. J. Williams, Dublin
Wertheimer M (1923) Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt. II. Psychol Forsch 4:301–350
Yue X, Vessel EA, Biederman I (2007) The neural basis of scene preferences. NeuroReport 18:525–529
Zaidel DW (2005) Neuropsychology of art: neurological, cognitive, and evolutionary perspectives. Psychology Press, Hove
Zaidel DW (2010) Art and brain: insights from neuropsychology, biology and evolution. J Anat 216:177–183
Zaimov K, Kitov D, Kolev N (1969) Aphasie chez un peintre. Encephale 58:377–417
Zeising A (1854) Neue Lehre von den Proportionen des menschlichen Körpers. Rudolf Weigel, Leipzig
Zeising A (1855) Aesthetische Forschungen. Meidinger Gohn and Comp, Frankfurt am Main
Zeki S (1999) Inner vision. An exploration of art and the brain. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Zeki S (2001) Artistic creativity and the brain. Science 293:51–52
Zeki S (2004) The neurology of ambiguity. Conscious Cogn 13:173–196
Zeki S, Marini L (1998) Three cortical stages of colour processing in the human brain. Brain 121:1669–1685
Acknowledgments
This research was made possible by Research Grant FFI2010-20759 awarded by the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación. Albert Flexas was supported by grant AP2008-02284 awarded by the Spanish Ministerio de Educación.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This contribution is the written, peer-reviewed version of a paper presented at the Golgi Symposium on Perspectives in Neuroaesthetics, held at the Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei in Rome on June 13, 2011.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nadal, M., Flexas, A., Gálvez, Á. et al. Neuroaesthetics: themes from the past, current issues, and challenges for the future. Rend. Fis. Acc. Lincei 23, 247–258 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12210-012-0185-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12210-012-0185-1