Skip to main content
Log in

The second evolution: after the genes the cultural birth

  • Published:
RENDICONTI LINCEI Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The development and evolution of the human mind–brain system occur through various mechanisms. The first is that of the prolongations of axons and dendrites. The second is that of the signals received from the environment. Following the gradual increase of the number of synaptic connections, the third is that of the auto-organization and the selection of the neural networks. According to Fodor, the mind–brain system can be divided into two types of faculties, indicated as vertical and horizontal, respectively. The neural networks of the vertical faculties are (1) genetically programmed, (2) largely predictable and (3) non-chaotic. The neural network of the horizontal faculties, on the other hand, is (1) not genetically determined and non-predictable, (2) developed by means of auto-organization processes and (3) obeying to the principles of the determinist chaos. The genes operate largely by means of imprinting mechanisms, which may lead to extensive acquisition of new knowledge and changes in behaviour. The cultural learning begins to emerge after the first year of life. Imitating, manipulating and speaking are three activities, well used by the human beings, which are essential for the development of the human behaviour. The learning of the language begins after the second year of life and proceeds at least up to the age of ten. The effect of imprinting is particularly striking for the learning of language. The capacities to move hands, fingers, tongue, mouth and larynges, are all localized in the Broca area: the genes are then necessary not only for the use of language, but also for the movement of mouth, hands and fingers, all damaged by lesions of the Broca area. Dawkins has emphasized the role of some specific natural entities, indicated as memes, which act as units of cultural–neural communication and are responsible for the transmission and diffusion of their informational content: everything learned by means of copying or imitating, may be then considered as product of the memes. The generation and transmission of information, by DNA and neural networks, have very different properties. The genetic birth, due to DNA, occurs mostly within the first year of life, whereas the cultural birth, due to the activities of the neural networks, lasts during the whole life and reflects the personal history of each individual. I suggest that everything attributed to the memes must be considered to be due to the neural networks, possessing the replicators’ properties of heredity, variation and selection. These networks are, then, the structures responsible for the transmission of information. Religion principles and scientific knowledge stem from two different conceptions of the world structure of nature. Many religions defend a static and determinist interpretation (1) realized once forever and (2) not subject to evolutionary changes. The scientific knowledge defends a dynamic and non-predictable interpretation of the world structure, in that it is opened to continuous modifications and evolutions. The scientific explanation of the natural world is based on (1) the atomistic conception and (2) the second principle of thermodynamics. The atomistic conception is based on the view that (1) all material entities, whether living or non-living, are made of smaller components, denoted as atoms and (2) the knowledge of these components is essential to explain the macroscopic properties. The second principle of thermodynamic explains the effects of the production and the consumption of energy. In most organized, natural, structures—whether genetic or physical or social—the efficiency of the system may be increased with the increase of complexity. Also the human societies may improve their efficiencies by shifting continuously toward increased, more specialized and complex specialization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In addition to the capacity of copying and imitating, the human beings have also the capacity to communicate by means of symbols. Although the cultural birth of a human beings may last for many years, some particular conditions must be respected.

  2. From the previous discussion, it appears that the culture and the environment where human beings have been living and operating have not been always equivalent. The attribution of great importance to the cultural and neural structure implies that, due to a higher capacity of utilization of the potentiality of their mind, the human beings have become able to develop more rapidly and to achieve a greater mental capacity. A fundamental importance must be attributed to the mutation that led to the development of the Broca’s area. Several human societies have, then, developed cultural entities, structures and procedures and have been able to transmit most of these entities to the next generations whereas many other human societies have not been able to do so.

  3. Particularly in astrophysics, there are continuously new discoveries of elementary particles, new stars, new galaxies and of new black holes in which disappear the star materials. In many cases, the interpretations of the universe have changed because the point of view of the observers has changed. These considerations are in contrast with the arguments of those who defend the view of an almost immobile structure stable forever and independent from the evolution of the scientific knowledge. In the unstable and non-predictable world, the culture and the behaviors of the human beings have the destiny to undergo continuous variations because of their nature and because of the changes of interpretations by those who study the properties of the natural world and of the human societies.

  4. The consequence is that the informational contents of the various pluri-stratified neural networks, specialized in the evaluation of cultural problems efficiency, remain always within the operational properties of the human mind and can never be transmitted by means of the classical genetic mechanisms.

  5. I wonder, then, whether it should not to be preferred to use the definition of human for the organisms using the products of the Broca area and capable of using the speech acts and of developing intentional product and the definition of pre-human for the primitive individuals, capable of using only the gesture forms of communication.

  6. The awareness that this second birth is mainly non-genetic, helps to understand and realize that it is erroneous to think of education as a unique type of model.

References

  • Azzone GF (2001) Il caso e la necessità: la duplice identità degli organismi viventi. Hist Philos Life Sci 23:169–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Azzone GF (2002) La moralità come adattamento. Zadig, Milan

    Google Scholar 

  • Azzone GF (2003) The dual genetic identity of human beings and the naturalization of morality. Hist Philos Life Sci 25:211–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azzone GF (2005) La libertà umana. Bollati Boringhieri, Turin

    Google Scholar 

  • Azzone GF (2008a) Origine e funzione del sistema mente-cervello. B. Mondadori, Milan

    Google Scholar 

  • Azzone GF (2008b) The genetic foundations of culture and morality. Rend Lincei 19:189–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore S (2002) La macchina dei memi. Instar Libri, Turin

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd R, Richardson PJ (1975) Culture and the evolutionary process. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalli-Sforza LL, Feldman MW (1981) Cultural transmission and evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky NA (1981) Riflessioni sul linguaggio. Einaudi, Turin

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky NA (2005) Nuovi orizzonti nello studio del linguaggio e della mente. Il Saggiatore, Milan

  • Dawkins R (1976) The selfish gene. It. Il gene egoista. A. Mondadori, Milan

  • Dawkins R (1986) The bind watchmaker. Longmans, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins R (2006) The God delusion. It. Edition, L’illusione di Dio. A. Mondatori, Milan

  • Deacon T (1988) The symbolic species: the coevolution of language and the human brain. Fioriti, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Eddington A (1955) La natura del mondo fisico. Laterza, Bari

  • Fodor JA (1988) Il sistema mente-cervello modulare. Il Mulino, Bologna

  • Pinker S, Bloom P (1990) Natural language and natural selection. Behav Brain Sci 13:707–784

    Google Scholar 

  • Plotkin HC (1993) Darwin machines and the nature of knowledge. Penguin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper KR (1934) The Logic of Scientific Discovery. It. Edition. Einaudi, Turin

  • Popper KR (1956) Realism and the aim of science. It. Edition. Il Saggiatore, Milan

  • Popper KR (1969) Conjectures and refutations. Routlege and Keagan, London

  • Popper KR (1972) Objective Knowledge. Oxford University press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner MI (2005) Genes and experience sharp brain networks of conscious control. Progr Brain Res 150:173–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine I, Stengers I (1981) La nuova alleanza. Le metamorfosi della scienza. Einaudi, Turin

    Google Scholar 

  • Remotti F (2008) Contro natura. Laterza, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridley M (2005) Il gene agile. La nuova alleanza fra eredità e ambiente. Adelphi, Milan

  • Rose S, Lewontin R, Kamin L (1983) Il gene e la sua mente. Biologia, ideologia e natura umana. Mondatori, Milan

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike EI (1898) Animal intelligence. Psychol Rev Monogr 2(8)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giovanni Felice Azzone.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Azzone, G.F. The second evolution: after the genes the cultural birth. Rend. Fis. Acc. Lincei 21, 283–299 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12210-010-0083-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12210-010-0083-3

Keywords

Navigation