Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Feasibility Assessment of Fast Numerical Simulations for Real-Time Monitoring and Control of PEM Fuel Cells

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Transactions of Tianjin University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Computational models that ensure accurate and fast responses to the variations in operating conditions, such as the cell temperature and relative humidity (RH), are essential monitoring tools for the real-time control of proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cells. To this end, fast cell-area-averaged numerical simulations are developed and verified against the present experiments under various RH levels. The present simulations and measurements are found to agree well based on the cell voltage (polarization curve) and power density under variable RH conditions (RH = 40%, RH = 70%, and RH = 100%), which verifies the model accuracy in predicting PEM fuel cell performance. In addition, computationally feasible reduced-order models are found to deliver a fast output dataset to evaluate the charge/heat/mass transfer phenomena as well as water production and two-phase flow transport. Such fast and accurate evaluations of the overall fuel cell operation can be used to inform the real-time control systems that allow for the improved optimization of PEM fuel cell performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Li XG (2005) Principles of fuel cells. CRC Press, Boca Raton. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.43-5913

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Li SA, Wei R, Zhang G et al (2020) Numerical investigation on the impact of membrane thickness on transport phenomena in PEM fuel cells. Int J Electrochem Sci 15(4):4138–4147

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Iranzo A, Boillat P, Biesdorf J et al (2015) Investigation of the liquid water distributions in a 50 cm2 PEM fuel cell: effects of reactants relative humidity, current density, and cathode stoichiometry. Energy 82:914–921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. DOE U (2010) Multi-year research, development and demonstration plan: planned program activities for 2005–2015. US Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Hydrogen, Fuel Cells and Infrastructure Technologies Program (HFCIT), pp 1–34

  5. Shahgaldi S, Alaefour I, Li XG (2018) The impact of short side chain ionomer on polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell performance and durability. Appl Energy 217:295–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shahgaldi S, Ozden A, Li XG et al (2019) A novel membrane electrode assembly design for proton exchange membrane fuel cells: characterization and performance evaluation. Electrochim Acta 299:809–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang JL, Tang YH, Song CJ et al (2008) PEM fuel cell relative humidity (RH) and its effect on performance at high temperatures. Electrochim Acta 53(16):5315–5321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Goshtasbi A, Pence BL, Chen JX et al (2020) A mathematical model toward real-time monitoring of automotive PEM fuel cells. J Electrochem Soc 167(2):024518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Xia ZF, Wang BW, Yang ZR et al (2019) Effect of operating conditions on performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cell with anode recirculation. Energy Procedia 158:1829–1834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sveshnikova A, Abrosimov K, Khayrullina A et al (2017) Effect of ambient air conditions on PEM fuel cell performance. J Renew Sustain Energy 9(4):044301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mittermeier T, Weiß A, Hasché F et al (2018) PEM fuel cell start-up/shut-down losses vs relative humidity: the impact of water in the electrode layer on carbon corrosion. J Electrochem Soc 165(16):F1349–F1357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Panahi A, Ghasemi A, Li XG (2021) Numerical simulation of particulate matter interaction with the gas diffusion layer of proton-exchange membrane fuel cells under various relative humidity conditions. Int J Energy Res 45(7):11084–11097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Arif M, Cheung SCP, Andrews J (2020) A systematic approach for matching simulated and experimental polarization curves for a PEM fuel cell. Int J Hydrog Energy 45(3):2206–2223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yu XX, Chang HW, Zhao JJ et al (2022) Application of self-adaptive temperature recognition in cold-start of an air-cooled proton exchange membrane fuel cell stack. Energy AI 9:100155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gong ZC, Wang BW, Wu KC et al (2022) A 1 + 1-D multiphase proton exchange membrane fuel cell model for real-time simulation. IEEE Trans Transp Electrif 8(2):2928–2944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhao J, Li XG, Shum C et al (2021) A review of physics-based and data-driven models for real-time control of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells. Energy AI 6:100114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang GB, Bao ZM, Xie B et al (2021) Three-dimensional multi-phase simulation of PEM fuel cell considering the full morphology of metal foam flow field. Int J Hydrog Energy 46(3):2978–2989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jiao K, Li XG (2009) Three-dimensional multiphase modeling of cold start processes in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells. Electrochim Acta 54(27):6876–6891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang BW, Wu KC, Yang ZR et al (2018) A quasi-2D transient model of proton exchange membrane fuel cell with anode recirculation. Energy Convers Manag 171:1463–1475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cownden R, Nahon M, Rosen MA (2001) Exergy analysis of a fuel cell power system for transportation applications. Exergy Int J 1(2):112–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hussain MM, Baschuk JJ, Li X et al (2005) Thermodynamic analysis of a PEM fuel cell power system. Int J Therm Sci 44(9):903–911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Springer TE, Zawodzinski TA, Gottesfeld S (1991) Polymer electrolyte fuel cell model. J Electrochem Soc 138(8):2334–2342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bernardi DM, Verbrugge MW (1992) A mathematical model of the solid-polymer-electrolyte fuel cell. J Electrochem Soc 139(9):2477–2491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Baschuk JJ, Li XG (2000) Modelling of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells with variable degrees of water flooding. J Power Sources 86(1–2):181–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wohr M (1998) Dynamic modelling and simulation of a polymer membrane fuel cell including mass transport limitation. Int J Hydrog Energy 23(3):213–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rowe A, Li XG (2001) Mathematical modeling of proton exchange membrane fuel cells. J Power Sources 102(1–2):82–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhou DM, Gao F, Al-Durra A et al (2018) Development of a multiphysical 2-D model of a PEM fuel cell for real-time control. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 54(5):4864–4874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. GreenLight (2022) PEM fuel cell test station. https://www.greenlightinnovation.com/products/fuel-cell/pem-testing/up-to-100w-at-80a-g20

  29. O’hayre R, Cha SW, Colella W et al (2016) Fuel cell fundamentals: O’Hayre/fuel cell fundamentals. Wiley, Hoboken. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119191766

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. Bird RB, Stewart WE, Lightfoot EN (2006) Transport phenomena, vol 1. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  31. Natarajan D, van Nguyen T (2001) A two-dimensional, two-phase, multicomponent, transient model for the cathode of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell using conventional gas distributors. J Electrochem Soc 148(12):A1324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wu H, Li XG, Berg P (2009) On the modeling of water transport in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells. Electrochim Acta 54(27):6913–6927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Majsztrik PW, Satterfield MB, Bocarsly AB et al (2007) Water sorption, desorption and transport in Nafion membranes. J Membr Sci 301(1–2):93–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Satterfield MB, Benziger JB (2008) Non-fickian water vapor sorption dynamics by nafion membranes. J Phys Chem B 112(12):3693–3704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Wu H (2009) Mathematical modeling of transient transport phenomena in PEM fuel cells. Corpus ID: 137980420

  36. Fritz DL, Allen JS (2009) Evaporation modeling for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. ECS Trans 25(1):49–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Weber AZ, Borup RL, Darling RM et al (2014) A critical review of modeling transport phenomena in polymer-electrolyte fuel cells. J Electrochem Soc 161(12):F1254–F1299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kierzenka J, Shampine LF (2008) A BVP solver that controls residual and error 1. JNAIAM J Numer Anal Ind Appl Math 3(1–2):27

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Vetter R, Schumacher JO (2019) Free open reference implementation of a two-phase PEM fuel cell model. Comput Phys Commun 234:223–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Russell RD, Christiansen J (1978) Adaptive mesh selection strategies for solving boundary value problems. SIAM J Numer Anal 15(1):59–80

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Dekker K, Verwer J (1984) Stability of Runge-Kutta methods for stiff nonlinear differential equations. CWI monographs, vol 2.https://doi.org/10.2307/2008192

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) via a Discovery Grant, and Canadian Urban Transit Research and Innovation Consortium (CUTRIC) (No. 160028).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada

    Abbas Ghasemi, Samaneh Shahgaldi & Xianguo Li

Authors
  1. Abbas Ghasemi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Samaneh Shahgaldi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xianguo Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xianguo Li.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghasemi, A., Shahgaldi, S. & Li, X. Feasibility Assessment of Fast Numerical Simulations for Real-Time Monitoring and Control of PEM Fuel Cells. Trans. Tianjin Univ. 29, 31–45 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12209-022-00347-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12209-022-00347-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation