Recent Advances in Constructing Interfacial Active Catalysts Based on Layered Double Hydroxides and Their Catalytic Mechanisms

Abstract

The interaction between the metal and the support of supported metal catalysts, which are widely used in industry, is the primary focus of the study of such catalysts. With the developing understanding of the metal–support interaction, the intrinsic factor that influences the catalytic performance has been determined to be the structure of interfacial sites. Layered double hydroxides (LDHs, a class of two-dimensional layered anion clay) possess several unique characteristics, such as the following: (1) tunable elemental component, homogeneous distribution of metal cations. (2) anchoring effect. (3) multiple layered structure for exfoliation or intercalation and special memory effect; and (4) internal/external confinement effects during topological transformation. Taking LDHs and their derivatives as precursors or supports shows superior advantages in designing interfacial active catalysts with tunable properties. Therefore, this review is mainly focused on constructing interfacial active catalysts by LDHs and revealing the interfacial effects (including electronic, geometric, and bifunctional effects) on the catalytic performance that will provide new perspectives and approaches for the development of heterogeneous catalysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

References

  1. 1.

    Zaera F (2013) Nanostructured materials for applications in heterogeneous catalysis. Chem Soc Rev 42(7):2746–2762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Sun YF, Gao S, Lei FC et al (2015) Atomically-thin two-dimensional sheets for understanding active sites in catalysis. Chem Soc Rev 44(3):623–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Wang HW, Lu JL (2020) A review on particle size effect in metal-catalyzed heterogeneous reactions. Chin J Chem 38(11):1422–1444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Li LL, Chang X, Lin XY et al (2020) Theoretical insights into single-atom catalysts. Chem Soc Rev 49(22):8156–8178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Yang XF, Wang AQ, Qiao BT et al (2013) Single-atom catalysts: a new frontier in heterogeneous catalysis. Acc Chem Res 46(8):1740–1748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Bell AT (2003) The impact of nanoscience on heterogeneous catalysis. Science 299(5613):1688–1691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Wang Y, Miao YN, Li S et al (2017) Metal-organic frameworks derived bimetallic Cu–Co catalyst for efficient and selective hydrogenation of biomass-derived furfural to furfuryl alcohol. Mol Catal 436:128–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Chen PR, Khetan A, Yang FK et al (2017) Experimental and theoretical understanding of nitrogen-doping-induced strong metal-support interactions in Pd/TiO2 catalysts for nitrobenzene hydrogenation. ACS Catal 7(2):1197–1206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Tan Y, Liu XY, Zhang LL et al (2017) ZnAl-hydrotalcite-supported Au25 nanoclusters as precatalysts for chemoselective hydrogenation of 3-nitrostyrene. Angew Chem Int Edit 56(10):2709–2713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Li JC, Li JM, Zhao Z et al (2017) Size effect of TS-1 supports on the catalytic performance of PtSn/TS-1 catalysts for propane dehydrogenation. J Catal 352:361–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Tuo YX, Shi LJ, Cheng HY et al (2018) Insight into the support effect on the particle size effect of Pt/C catalysts in dehydrogenation. J Catal 360:175–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Li ZY, Peters AW, Platero-Prats AE et al (2017) Fine-tuning the activity of metal-organic framework-supported cobalt catalysts for the oxidative dehydrogenation of propane. J Am Chem Soc 139(42):15251–15258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Wu GD, Zhao GQ, Sun JH et al (2019) The effect of oxygen vacancies in ZnO at an Au/ZnO interface on its catalytic selective oxidation of glycerol. J Catal 377:271–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Li HP, Yang TX, Jiang YW et al (2020) Synthesis of supported Pd nanocluster catalyst by spontaneous reduction on layered double hydroxide. J Catal 385:313–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Yang TF, Huo Y, Liu Y et al (2017) Efficient formaldehyde oxidation over nickel hydroxide promoted Pt/γ-Al2O3 with a low Pt content. Appl Catal B Environ 200:543–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Yu YZ, Gan YM, Huang CQ et al (2020) Ni/La2O3 and Ni/MgO-La2O3 catalysts for the decomposition of NH3 into hydrogen. Int J Hydrog Energy 45(33):16528–16539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Liu MM, Zhou L, Luo XJ et al (2020) Recent advances in noble metal catalysts for hydrogen production from amonia borane. Catalysts 10(7):788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Brijaldo MH, Caytuero AE, Martínez JJ et al (2020) Hydrogen production from acetic acid decomposition as bio-oil model molecule over supported metal catalysts. Int J Hydrog Energy 45(53):28732–28751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Foppa L, Margossian T, Kim SM et al (2017) Contrasting the role of Ni/Al2O3 interfaces in water-gas shift and dry reforming of methane. J Am Chem Soc 139(47):17128–17139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Yabe T, Mitarai K, Oshima K et al (2017) Low-temperature dry reforming of methane to produce syngas in an electric field over La-doped Ni/ZrO2 catalysts. Fuel Process Technol 158:96–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Cimino S, Lisi L, Mancino G (2017) Effect of phosphorous addition to Rh-supported catalysts for the dry reforming of methane. Int J Hydrog Energy 42(37):23587–23598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Zhang LJ, Wang FG, Zhu JY et al (2019) CO2 reforming with methane reaction over Ni@SiO2 catalysts coupled by size effect and metal-support interaction. Fuel 256:115954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Tauster SJ, Fung SC, Garten RL (1978) Strong metal-support interactions. Group 8 noble metals supported on titanium dioxide. J Am Chem Soc 100(1):170–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Wang C, Jiang W, Chen HX et al (2021) Pt nanoparticles encapsulated on V2O5 nanosheets carriers as efficient catalysts for promoted aerobic oxidative desulfurization performance. Chin J Catal 42(4):557–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Aranda DAG, Schmal M (1997) Ligand and geometric effects on Pt/Nb2O5 and Pt-Sn/Nb2O5 catalysts. J Catal 171(2):398–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Song ZX, Banis MN, Zhang L et al (2018) Origin of achieving the enhanced activity and stability of Pt electrocatalysts with strong metal-support interactions via atomic layer deposition. Nano Energy 53:716–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Cargnello M, Jaén JJD, Garrido JCH et al (2012) Exceptional activity for methane combustion over modular Pd@CeO2 subunits on functionalized Al2O3. Science 337(6095):713–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Dandekar A, Vannice M (1999) Crotonaldehyde hydrogenation on Pt/TiO2 and Ni/TiO2 SMSI catalysts. J Catal 183(2):344–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Hu QM, Wang S, Gao Z et al (2017) The precise decoration of Pt nanoparticles with Fe oxide by atomic layer deposition for the selective hydrogenation of cinnamaldehyde. Appl Catal B Environ 218:591–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Chang SJ, Li M, Hua Q et al (2012) Shape-dependent interplay between oxygen vacancies and Ag–CeO2 interaction in Ag/CeO2 catalysts and their influence on the catalytic activity. J Catal 293:195–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Matsubu JC, Zhang SY, DeRita L et al (2017) Adsorbate-mediated strong metal-support interactions in oxide-supported Rh catalysts. Nat Chem 9(2):120–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Green IX, Tang W, Neurock M et al (2011) Spectroscopic observation of dual catalytic sites during oxidation of CO on a Au/TiO2 catalyst. Science 333(6043):736–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Ro I, Resasco J, Christopher P (2018) Approaches for understanding and controlling interfacial effects in oxide-supported metal catalysts. ACS Catal 8(8):7368–7387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Shekhar M, Wang J, Lee WS et al (2012) Size and support effects for the water-gas shift catalysis over gold nanoparticles supported on model Al2O3 and TiO2. J Am Chem Soc 134(10):4700–4708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Tang HL, Wei JK, Liu F et al (2016) Strong metal-support interactions between gold nanoparticles and nonoxides. J Am Chem Soc 138(1):56–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Lu JL, Fu BS, Kung MC et al (2012) Coking and sintering-resistant palladium catalysts achieved through atomic layer deposition. Science 335(6073):1205–1208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Feng JT, He YF, Liu YN et al (2015) Supported catalysts based on layered double hydroxides for catalytic oxidation and hydrogenation: general functionality and promising application prospects. Chem Soc Rev 44(15):5291–5319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Fan GL, Li F, Evans DG et al (2014) Catalytic applications of layered double hydroxides: recent advances and perspectives. Chem Soc Rev 43(20):7040–7066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Li KT, Wang GR, Li DQ et al (2013) Intercalation assembly method and intercalation process control of layered intercalated functional materials. Chin J Chem Eng 21(4):453–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Gao R, Yan DP (2018) Fast formation of single-unit-cell-thick and defect-rich layered double hydroxide nanosheets with highly enhanced oxygen evolution reaction for water splitting. Nano Res 11(4):1883–1894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Arif M, Yasin G, Shakeel M et al (2018) Coupling of bifunctional CoMn-layered double hydroxide@graphitic C3N4 nanohybrids towards efficient photoelectrochemical overall water splitting. Chem Asian J 13(8):1045–1052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Arif M, Yasin G, Luo L et al (2020) Hierarchical hollow nanotubes of NiFeV-layered double hydroxides@CoVP heterostructures towards efficient, pH-universal electrocatalytical nitrogen reduction reaction to ammonia. Appl Catal B Environ 265:118559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Takehira K (2017) Recent development of layered double hydroxide-derived catalysts-rehydration, reconstitution, and supporting, aiming at commercial application. Appl Clay Sci 136:112–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Feng JT, Ma C, Miedziak PJ et al (2013) Au-Pd nanoalloys supported on Mg–Al mixed metal oxides as a multifunctional catalyst for solvent-free oxidation of benzyl alcohol. Dalton Trans 42(40):14498–14508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Du YY, Jin Q, Feng JT et al (2015) Flower-like Au/Ni–Al hydrotalcite with hierarchical pore structure as a multifunctional catalyst for catalytic oxidation of alcohol. Catal Sci Technol 5(6):3216–3225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Yin ST, Li J, Zhang H (2016) Hierarchical hollow nanostructured core@shell recyclable catalysts γ-Fe2O3@LDH@Au25-x for highly efficient alcohol oxidation. Green Chem 18(21):5900–5914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Liu YN, Feng JT, He YF et al (2015) Partial hydrogenation of acetylene over a NiTi-layered double hydroxide supported PdAg catalyst. Catal Sci Technol 5(2):1231–1240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Du LL, Shi GD, Zhao YR et al (2019) Plasmon-promoted electrocatalytic water splitting on metal-semiconductor nanocomposites: the interfacial charge transfer and the real catalytic sites. Chem Sci 10(41):9605–9612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Miao CL, Hui TL, Liu YN et al (2019) Pd/MgAl-LDH nanocatalyst with vacancy-rich sandwich structure: insight into interfacial effect for selective hydrogenation. J Catal 370:107–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Han RR, Nan CS, Yang L et al (2015) Direct synthesis of hybrid layered double hydroxide-carbon composites supported Pd nanocatalysts efficient in selective hydrogenation of citral. RSC Adv 5(42):33199–33207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Lestari PR, Takei T, Yanagida S et al (2020) Facile and controllable synthesis of Zn-Al layered double hydroxide/silver hybrid by exfoliation process and its plasmonic photocatalytic activity of phenol degradation. Mater Chem Phys 250:122988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Wang KX, Miao CL, Liu YN et al (2020) Vacancy enriched ultrathin TiMgAl-layered double hydroxide/graphene oxides composites as highly efficient visible-light catalysts for CO2 reduction. Appl Catal B Environ 270:18878

    Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Chen T, Zhang FZ, Zhu Y (2013) Pd nanoparticles on layered double hydroxide as efficient catalysts for solvent-free oxidation of benzyl alcohol using molecular oxygen: effect of support basic properties. Catal Lett 143(2):206–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Zhang JB, Li XL, Xu M et al (2019) Glycerol aerobic oxidation to glyceric acid over Pt/hydrotalcite catalysts at room temperature. Sci Bull 64(23):1764–1772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Hu Q, Yang L, Fan GL et al (2016) Hydrogenation of biomass-derived compounds containing a carbonyl group over a copper-based nanocatalyst: insight into the origin and influence of surface oxygen vacancies. J Catal 340:184–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Ren BJ, Zhao C, Yang L et al (2020) Robust structured Cu-based film catalysts with greatly enhanced catalytic hydrogenation property. Appl Surf Sci 504:144364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Li YW, Gao W, Peng M et al (2020) Interfacial Fe5C2-Cu catalysts toward low-pressure syngas conversion to long-chain alcohols. Nat Commun 11:61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Zhang J, Yan WJ, An Z et al (2018) Interface-promoted dehydrogenation and water-gas shift toward high-efficient H2 reduction from aqueous phase reforming of cellulose. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 6(6):7313–7324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Zhang J, Zhu YR, An Z et al (2020) Size effects of Ni particles on the cleavage of C–H and C–C bonds toward hydrogen production from cellulose. ACS Appl Energy Mater 3(7):7048–7057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Zhang J, Zhu YR, An Z et al (2020) Mg-vacancy-induced Ni-vacancy clusters: highly efficient hydrogen production from cellulose. J Mater Chem A 8(29):14697–14705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Chen H, He S, Xu M et al (2017) Promoted synergic catalysis between metal Ni and acid-base sites toward oxidant-free dehydrogenation of alcohols. ACS Catal 7(4):2735–2743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    An Z, Wang WL, Dong SH et al (2019) Well-distributed cobalt-based catalysts derived from layered double hydroxides for efficient selective hydrogenation of 5-hydroxymethyfurfural to 2, 5-methylfuran. Catal Today 319:128–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Ning X, An Z, He J (2016) Remarkably efficient CoGa catalyst with uniformly dispersed and trapped structure for ethanol and higher alcohol synthesis from syngas. J Catal 340:236–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Zhu YR, Guo H, Zhang J et al (2020) CoGa particles stabilized by the combination of alloyed Ga0 and lattice GaIII species. Ind Eng Chem Res 59(18):8649–8660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Zhao YF, Li ZH, Li MZ et al (2018) Reductive transformation of layered-double-hydroxide nanosheets to Fe-based heterostructures for efficient visible-light photocatalytic hydrogenation of CO. Adv Mater 30(36):1803127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Wang Q, Feng JT, Zheng LR et al (2020) Interfacial structure-determined reaction pathway and selectivity for 5-(hydroxymethyl) furfural hydrogenation over Cu-based catalysts. ACS Catal 10(2):1353–1365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Zhao JW, Xu S, Wu HJ et al (2019) Metal-support interactions on Ru/CaAlOx catalysts derived from structural reconstruction of Ca–Al layered double hydroxides for ammonia decomposition. Chem Commun 55(96):14410–14413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Ding JF, Li LP, Wang Y et al (2020) Topological transformation of LDH nanosheets to highly dispersed PtNiFe nanoalloys enhancing CO oxidation performance. Nanoscale 12(27):14882–14894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Liu N, Xu M, Yang YS et al (2019) Auδ–Ov-Ti3 + interfacial site: catalytic active center toward low-temperature water gas shift reaction. ACS Catal 9(4):2707–2717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Li XL, Zhang JB, Liu W et al (2020) Charge-mediated Auδ+-oxygen vacancy towards glycerol oxidation with largely improved catalytic performance. Appl Catal A: Gen 598:117558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Hui TL, Miao CL, Feng JT et al (2020) Atmosphere induced amorphous and permeable carbon layer encapsulating PtGa catalyst for selective cinnamaldehyde hydrogenation. J Catal 389:229–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Zhu YP, Wang JL, Chu H et al (2020) In situ/operando studies for designing next-generation electrocatalysts. ACS Energy Lett 5(4):1281–1291

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation (Nos. 22022801, 21878016), National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2016YFB0301601) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Nos. BHYC1701B, JD2004).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yanan Liu or Junting Feng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Du, H., Fan, J., Miao, C. et al. Recent Advances in Constructing Interfacial Active Catalysts Based on Layered Double Hydroxides and Their Catalytic Mechanisms. Trans. Tianjin Univ. 27, 24–41 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12209-020-00277-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Supported metal catalyst
  • Interfacial active sites
  • LDHs
  • Interfacial effects
  • Catalytic mechanism