Advertisement

Transactions of Tianjin University

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 182–190 | Cite as

Failure Envelopes of Wide-Shallow Composite Bucket Foundation for Offshore Wind Turbines in Silty Sand

  • Yonggang Liu
  • Yaohua Guo
  • Hongyan Ding
  • Puyang Zhang
Research Paper
  • 83 Downloads

Abstract

The wide-shallow composite bucket foundation (WSCBF) is a new type of offshore wind power foundation that can be built on land and rapidly installed offshore, thereby effectively reducing the construction time and costs of offshore wind power foundation. In this study, the horizontal bearing capacity is calculated by finite element simulation and compared with test results to verify the validity of results. In this process, the vertical load and bending load are respectively calculated by the finite element simulation. Under the vertical load effect, the bucket foundation and the soil inside are regarded as a whole, and the corresponding buckling failure mode is obtained. The ultimate vertical bearing capacity is calculated using empirical and theoretical formulas; the theoretical formula is also revised by finite element results. Under bending load, the rotational center of the composite bucket foundation (in a region close to the bucket bottom) gradually moves from the left of the central axis (reverse to loading direction) to the nearby compartment boards along the loading direction. The H–M envelope line shows a linear relationship, and it is determined that the vertical and bending ultimate bearing capacities can be improved by an appropriate vertical load.

Keywords

Wide-shallow composite bucket foundation Silty sand Offshore wind turbines 

Notes

Acknowledegements

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51379142 and No. 51679163), Innovation Method Fund of China (No. 2016IM030100) and the Tianjin Municipal Natural Science Foundation (No. 17JCYBJC22000).

References

  1. 1.
    Zhang PY, Guo YH, Liu YG et al (2015) Model tests on sinking technique of composite bucket foundations for offshore wind turbines in silty clay. J Renew Sustain Energy 7(3):033113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhang PY, Ding HY, Le CH (2014) Seismic response of large-scale pre-stressed concrete bucket foundation for offshore wind turbines. J Renew Sustain Energy 6(1):013127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ding HY, Lian JJ, Li AD et al (2013) One-step-installation of offshore wind turbine on large-scale bucket-top-bearing bucket foundation. Trans Tianjin Univ 19(3):188–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lian JJ, Chen F, Wang HJ (2014) Laboratory tests on soil-skirt interaction and penetration resistance of suction caissons during installation in sand. Ocean Eng 84:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Liu R, Chen GS, Lian JJ et al (2015) Vertical bearing behaviour of the composite bucket shallow foundation of offshore wind turbines. J Renew Sustain Energy 7(1):013123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Houlsby GT, Ibsen LB, Byrne BW (2005) Suction caissons for wind turbines. In: Frontiers in Offshore Geotechnics, ISFOG 2005—Proceedings of the 1st international symposium on frontiers in offshore geotechnics, Perth, pp 75–93Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Christian L (2004) Design of offshore wind turbine support structures: selected topics in the field of geotechnical engineering. Dissertation, Technical University of Denmark, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Villalobos FA (2006) Model testing of foundations for offshore wind turbines. Dissertation, University of Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yu H, Zeng XW, Li B et al (2015) Centrifuge modeling of offshore wind foundations under earthquake loading. Soil Dynamics Earthq Eng 77:402–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tan FSC (1990) Centrifuge and theoretical modeling of conical footings on sand. Dissertation, Cambridge University, UKGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Supachawarote C, Randolph MF, Gourvenec S (2004) Inclined pull-out capacity of suction caissons. In: Proceedings of the fourteenth (2004) international offshore and polar engineering conference—ISOPE 2004, Toulon, France, pp 500–506Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Monajemi H, Razak HA (2009) Finite element modeling of suction anchors under combined loading. Marine Structures 22(4):660–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ding HY, Liu YG, Zhang PY et al (2015) Model tests on the bearing capacity of wide-shallow composite bucket foundation for offshore wind turbines in clay. Ocean Eng 103:114–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liu MM, Yang M, Wang HJ (2014) Bearing behavior of wide-shallow bucket foundation for offshore wind turbines in drained silty sand. Ocean Eng 82:169–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wu K, Luan MT, Fan QL et al (2008) Failure mechanism and ultimate bearing capacity of bucket foundation in shallow water. Chin J Geotech Eng 30(3):394–398 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jiao BT, Shi ZM, Lu XB et al (2010) Study on the responses of suction bucket in fine sand deposit under horizontal dynamic loading. Eng Mech 27(7):131–141 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gourvenec S (2008) Effect of embedment on the undrained capacity of shallow foundations under general loading. Geotechnique 58(3):177–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhan YG, Liu FC (2010) Numerical analysis of bearing capacity of suction bucket foundation for offshore wind turbines. Electron J Geotech Eng 15F:633–644Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fan QL, Luan MT (2010) Failure envelopes of bucket foundation for offshore wind turbines in V-H-T loading space. China Civil Engineering J 43(4):113–118 (in Chinese) Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Tianjin University and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yonggang Liu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yaohua Guo
    • 1
    • 2
  • Hongyan Ding
    • 1
    • 2
  • Puyang Zhang
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Simulation and SafetyTianjin UniversityTianjinChina
  2. 2.School of Civil EngineeringTianjin UniversityTianjinChina

Personalised recommendations