Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental Studies on Modified Suction Caissons in Fine Sand Subject to Uplift Loading

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Transactions of Tianjin University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A modified suction caisson (MSC), which was reported by the authors of this paper previously, comprises an external short-skirted structure that is added to a regular suction caisson (RSC). It has been proved that MSCs can improve the lateral bearing capacity and limit the deflection of the caisson compared with RSCs. A series of model tests were conducted to investigate responses of MSCs subject to uplift loading in saturated sand. The effects of external skirt dimensions on the uplift bearing capacity of MSCs were considered. In addition, the influences of the sealed top lid of the skirted structure on the uplift bearing capacity and the resulting passive suction of MSCs were also studied. It was found that the uplift bearing capacities of MSCs are 1.4–1.7 times that of RSCs. Moreover, test results in serviceable conditions show that the sealed external skirted structure of perspex-made suction caissons significantly contributed to the uplift bearing capacity as a result of passive suction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tjelta TI (2001) Suction piles: their position and application today. In: Proceedings of the eleventh international offshore and polar engineering conference, Stavanger, Norway. pp 1–6

  2. Butterfield S, Musial W, Jonkman JM et al (2005) Engineering challenges for floating offshore wind turbines. In: Proceedings of 2005 Copenhagen offshore wind conference, Copenhagen, Denmark, pp 1–10

  3. Peterson RW, Lee LT (2001) Underwater geotechnical foundations. In: Ports ‘01. Proceedings of the conference, Norfolk, USA

  4. StlfWe OJ, Bysveen S, Christophersen HP (1992) New foundation systems for the Snorre development. In: Proceedings of annual offshore technology conference, Houston, USA

  5. Li DY, Du H, Sun ZJ et al (2010) Offshore skirted suction anchors—a modified type. State Intellectual Property Office of China, Beijing, China, ZL200920239914.8 (in Chinese)

  6. Li DY, Zhang YK, Feng LY et al (2014) Response of skirted suction caissons to monotonic lateral loading in saturated medium sand. China Ocean Eng 28:569–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Li DY, Feng LY, Zhang YK (2014) Model tests of modified suction caissons in marine sand under monotonic lateral combined loading. Appl Ocean Res 48:137–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Li DY, Zhang YK, Feng LY et al (2015) Capacity of modified suction caissons in marine sand under static lateral loading. Ocean Eng 102:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Teodosio B, Kim Y, Ahn J et al (2014) Model tests of suction caisson anchors: reviews and preliminary results. In: Advance in soil dynamics and foundation engineering, Shanghai, China, pp 301–311

  10. Finn WDL, Byrne PM (1972) The evaluation of the breakout force for a submerged ocean platform. In: Offshore technology conference, Houston, USA, pp 351–365

  11. Wang MC, Demars KR, Nacci VA (1977) Breakout capacity of model suction anchors in soil. Can Geotech J 14:246–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Andersen KH, Dyvik R, Schroeder K et al (1993) Field tests of anchors in clay. II: predictions and interpretation. J Geotech Eng 119:1532–1549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Watson PG, Randolph MF (1997) Vertical capacity of caisson foundations in calcareous sediments. In: International offshore and polar engineering conference, Honolulu, USA, pp 25–30

  14. Luke AM, Rauch AF, Olson RE et al (2005) Components of suction caisson capacity measured in axial pullout tests. Ocean Eng 32:878–891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rao SN, Latha KH, Pallavi B et al (2006) Studies on pullout capacity of anchors in marine clays for mooring systems. Appl Ocean Res 28:103–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gao YF, Qiu Y, Li B et al (2013) Experimental studies on the anti-uplift behavior of the suction caissons in sand. Appl Ocean Res 43:37–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mana DSK, Gourvenec S, Randolph MF (2014) Numerical modelling of seepage beneath skirted foundations subjected to vertical uplift. Comput Geotech 55:150–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen W, Randolph MF (2007) Uplift capacity of suction caissons under sustained and cyclic loading in soft clay. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 133:1352–1363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Byrne BW, Houlsby GT (2004) Experimental investigations of the response of suction caissons to transient combined loading. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 130:240–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gourvenec S, Acosta-martinez HE, Randolph MF (2009) Experimental study of uplift resistance of shallow skirted foundations in clay under transient and sustained concentric loading. Geotechnique 59:525–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kelly RB, Houlsby GT, Byrne BW (2006) A comparison of field and laboratory tests of caisson foundations in sand and clay. Geotechnique 56:617–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 51379118 and 51639002) and SDUST Research Fund (no. 2015TDJH104).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dayong Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhai, H., Li, D. Experimental Studies on Modified Suction Caissons in Fine Sand Subject to Uplift Loading. Trans. Tianjin Univ. 23, 562–569 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12209-017-0085-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12209-017-0085-7

Keywords

Navigation