Transactions of Tianjin University

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 152–159 | Cite as

Influence of Orifice Position Deviations on Distribution Performance of Gravity-Type Liquid Distributor Analyzed Through Mathematical Pathway

  • Jinsheng Sun
  • Zhiwei Zhang
  • Chengtian Cui
  • Tianpei Li
  • Sheng Fu
Research Article
  • 56 Downloads

Abstract

The distribution performance of the gravity-type liquid distributor (GTLD) significantly affects column operation efficiency and the consequent product quality. In industrial settings, maldistribution is normally considered to be caused by vertical positional or coplanarity errors stemming from deflections associated with manufacture and installation, or even by excessive weight. The lack of estimation protocols or standards impedes the description of this error, which influences the corresponding outflow rates. Given this situation, the paper proposes a lumped parameter, orifice position deviation (OPD), to facilitate the calculation of the relative discharge rate error (RDRE) based on a formula derivation, which allows the systematic analysis of the influence of a single orifice or weir OPD. The paper introduces a sensitivity factor K as a concise and unified expression in theoretical RDREs for calibrating the influence of OPD on the RDREs of geometrically different orifices and weirs. With respect to the GTLD, a larger K indicates the need for more strict OPD requirements. The paper verifies that the extent of GTLD outflow nonuniformity is associated with diverging tendencies regarding its morphology, especially in the orifice and weir, which can be determined using our proposed procedures.

Keywords

Liquid distributor Installation Orifice position deviation Relative discharge rate error Sensitivity factor 

Supplementary material

12209_2017_78_MOESM1_ESM.docx (88 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 88 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Lothar Spiegel (2006) A new method to assess liquid distributor quality. Chem Eng Process 45(11):1011–1017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wang SY (1998) Technical guide for modern packing towers. China Petrochemical Press, Beijing, pp 163–180 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dong YR, Xu CS (1996) Analysis of fluid distributors of packed column. Chem Eng 24(4):25–31 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kunesh John G, Lawrence Lahm, Takashi Yanagi (1987) Commercial scale experiences that provide insight on packed tower distributors. Ind Eng Che Res 26(9):1845–1850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sun XJ, Chen JJ, Qin L (2002) Design and application of liquid distributor in large-sized packing tower. Petrochemical Design 19(1):10–15 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lanzhou Petroleum Machinery Research Institute (2005) Modern tower technology, 2nd edn. China Petrochemical Press, Beijing, pp 886–927 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shariat Ahmad, Kunesh John G (1995) Packing efficiency testing on a commercial scale with good (and not as good) reflux distribution. Ind Eng Che Res 34(4):1273–1279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Finnemore JE, Franzini JB (2001) Fluid mechanics with engineering applications, 10th edn. McGraw-Hill Science/Engineering/Math, New York, pp 381–387Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhang JC, Dong YR (2000) Experimental study on the coefficients of discharge through the orifices for liquid distributors with the orifice type of the packed columns. Chem Eng 28(3):10–12 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yu B, Fu PF, Zhang T et al (2013) The influence of back pressure on the flow discharge coefficients of plain orifice nozzle. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 44:509–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hollingshead CL, Johnson MC, Barfuss SL et al (2011) Discharge coefficient performance of Venturi, standard concentric orifice plate, V-cone and wedge flow meters at low Reynolds numbers. J Petrol Sci Eng 78(3–4):559–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chyan-Deng Jan, Quang-Truong Nguyen (2010) Discharge coefficient for a water flow through a bottom orifice of a conical hopper. J Irrig Drain Eng 136(8):567–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cao R, Liu YS, Yan CY (2011) A criterion for flow mechanisms through vertical sharp-edged orifice and model for the orifice discharge coefficient. Petrol Sci 8(1):108–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cao R, Liu YS, Yan CY et al (2008) Characteristics of vertical sharp-edged orifice discharge (I): effect of flow regime and configuration parameters on orifice discharge coefficient. J Chem Ind Eng (China) 59(9):2175–2180 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cao R, Liu YS (2009) Characteristics of vertical sharp-edged orifice discharge (III): effect of geometry on orifice discharge coefficient. J Chem Ind Eng (China) 60(5):1121–1126 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Huang S, Ma T, Wang D et al (2013) Study on discharge coefficient of perforated orifices as a new kind of flowmeter. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 46(4):74–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    HG/T 21585.1-1998 (1999) Removable-type trough-pan gas and liquid distributor, Beijing (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Liu DY, Chen L (2010) Manufacture and installation of liquid distributor in film evaporator. Pharm Eng Des 31(5):1–2 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ji WM (2013) Manufacture and installation of the adsorption tower internals. Petro Chem Equip Technol 34(4):8–14 (in Chinese) Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Tianjin University and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jinsheng Sun
    • 1
  • Zhiwei Zhang
    • 1
  • Chengtian Cui
    • 1
  • Tianpei Li
    • 1
  • Sheng Fu
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Chemical Engineering and TechnologyTianjin UniversityTianjinChina

Personalised recommendations