Abstract
The construction of arch dams exhibits high uncertainty. Sensitivity analysis of construction parameters is important for the design and optimization of dam construction duration. However, current research cannot fully consider the combined influences of multiple parameters on the total construction. To effectively analyze the duration of arch dam construction, this study proposes a global comprehensive sensitivity analysis method in view of the whole process of arch dam construction based on an orthogonal experiment. This method could comprehensively consider the influence of the construction parameters that may lead to the uncertainty of construction duration. In addition, this method is able to identify the key parameters that may have a significant effect on duration uncertainty and sums up the general rules of combined parameters’ interaction effect, which provides a scientific basis for reasonable optimization of the duration of dam construction.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Zhong DH, Ren BY, Wu KX (2008) Construction simulation and real-time control for high arch dam. Trans Tianjin Univ 14(4):248–253
Liu Q, Hu ZG, Wang J et al (2007) Analysis on comprehensive assurance of construction schedule for hydropower project. In: CME 2007 conference—construction management and economics: ‘past, present and future’. Reading, p 1439–1448
Elena Bruni Maria, Patrizia Beraldi, Francesca Guerriero et al (2011) A scheduling methodology for dealing with uncertainty in construction projects. Eng Comput (Swansea, Wales) 28(8):1064–1078
Zhao CJ, Zhou YH, An H (2009) Visual dynamic simulation based optimal scheduling of RCC dam construction management. In: Proceedings of the 2009 international conference on management and service science (MASS). Wuhan
Huang ZQ, Li YH (2007) Risk analysis of construction progress of large concrete arch dam. Hubei Water Power 9(6):43–46 (in Chinese)
Song FL, Liu Q, Wu X (2012) Construction simulation analysis and scheme comparison on construction progress of arch dam for Jinping I Hydropower Station. Water Resour Hydropower Eng 43(7):64–68 (in Chinese)
Zhong DH, Yang SR, Chang HT et al (2015) Construction schedule risk analysis of high roller-compacted concrete dams based on improved CSRAM. Sci China Technol Sci 58(6):1021–1030
Wang XL, Zhao MQ, Hong K et al (2015) Global comprehensive sensitivity analysis of water-conveying tunnel TBM construction duration. J Tianjin Univ (Sci Technol) 48(7):569–577 (in Chinese)
AbouRizk S (2010) Role of simulation in construction engineering and management. J Constr Eng Manag 136(10):1140–1153
Dong-Eun Lee, Ardit D, Son C-B (2013) The probability distribution of project completion times in simulation-based scheduling. KSCE J Civil Eng 17(4):638–645
Liu Y, Li Y (2014) Risk management of construction schedule by PERT with Monte Carlo simulation. Appl Mech Mater 548–549:1646–1650
Liang RQ, Weng YH, Guan T et al (2014) Simulation analysis and scheme optimization for construction progress of high arch dam of Wudongde Hydropower Station. Yangtze River 45(20):76–79 (in Chinese)
Zhou HW (2013) Research on simulation of RCC dam construction based on fault response of production system. Dissertation. China Three Gorges University, Yichang, China, 56–57 (in Chinese)
Fang KT, Ma CX (2001) Orthogonal and uniform design. Science Press, Beijing, pp 13–17 [p 35 (in Chinese)]
Zhong DH, Yang SR (2003) The region analysis of model parameters sensitivity on the simulation calculation on dam construction. Comput Simul 20(12):48–50 (in Chinese)
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the Foundation for Innovation Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51621092), and National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51339003 and 51409186).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhong, D., Chu, Z., Ren, B. et al. Global Comprehensive Sensitivity Analysis of Arch Dam Construction Parameters Based on Orthogonal Experiment. Trans. Tianjin Univ. 23, 427–433 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12209-017-0074-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12209-017-0074-x