Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effects of characteristics of fly ash on the properties of geopolymer

  • Published:
Transactions of Tianjin University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The properties of two types of fly ash geopolymers made from class F fly ashes produced in wet bottom and dry bottom boilers were investigated in the present study. The source material used in the geopolymer concrete was activated with sodium hydroxide and sodium silicate solution. The results revealed that the geopolymer produced with wet bottom boiler fly ash(CZ-FA)hardened quickly, and had higher early-age strength and lower shrinkage than the geopolymer produced with dry bottom boiler fly ash(SX-FA). The compressive strength of the two geopolymers made from CZ-FA and SX-FA was 45 MPa and 15 MPa respectively when cured at 60 °C and delayed for 14 d. However, after 90 days’ delay, the compressive strength of both the samples is almost the same, up to 80 MPa. Nearly 20% volume shrinkage of the samples made from SX-FA was much higher than that made from CZ-FA, which was almost zero. XRD, SEM/EDS and FT-IR were used to analyze the main reason of the differences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Guo X, Shi H, Dick W A. Compressive strength and microstructural characteristics of Class C fly ash geopolymer[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2010, 32(2): 142–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Canfield G M, Eichler J, Griffith K et al. The role of calcium in blended fly ash geopolymers [J]. Journal of Materials Science, 2014, 49(17): 5922–5933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Duxson P, Provis J L, Lukey G C et al. The role of inorganic polymer technology in the development of ‘green concrete’ [J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2007, 37(12): 1590–1597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yildirim H, Sumer M, Akyuncu V et al. Comparison on efficiency factors of F and C types of fly ashes [J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2011, 25(6): 2939–2947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zheng L, Wang W, Shi Y. The effects of alkaline dosage and Si/Al ratio on the immobilization of heavy metals in municipal solid waste incineration fly ash-based geopolymer [J]. Chemosphere, 2010, 79(6): 665–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. van Deventer J S, Provis J L, Duxson P et al. Reaction mechanisms in the geopolymeric conversion of inorganic waste to useful products [J]. J Hazard Mater, 2007, 139(3): 506–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Oh J E, Jun Y, Jeong Y et al. Characterization of geopolymers from compositionally and physically different Class F fly ashes[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2014, 50: 16–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jun Y, Oh J E. Mechanical and microstructural dissimilarities in alkali-activation for six Class F Korean fly ashes [J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2014, 52: 396–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Park Y M, Yang T Y, Yoon S Y et al. Mullite whiskers derived from coal fly ash[J]. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2007, 454/455: 518–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Böke N, Birch G D, Nyale S M et al. New synthesis method for the production of coal fly ash-based foamed geopolymers [J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2015, 75: 189–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Oh J E, Monteiro P J M, Jun S S et al. The evolution of strength and crystalline phases for alkali-activated ground blast furnace slag and fly ash-based geopolymers [J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2010, 40(2): 189–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kramar S, Ducman V. Mechanical and microstructural characterization of geopolymer synthesized from low calcium fly ash [J]. Chemical Industry and Chemical Engineering Quarterly, 2015, 21(1): 13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Palomo A, Blanco-Varela M T, Granizo M L et al. Chemical stability of cementitious materials based on metakaolin [J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 1999, 29(7): 997–1004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Duxson P, Provis J L, Lukey G C et al. Understanding the relationship between geopolymer composition, microstructure and mechanical properties [J]. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2005, 269(1-3): 47–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tishmack J K, Olek J, Diamond S. Characterization of high-calcium fly ashes and their potential influence on ettringite formation in cementitious systems [J]. Cement Concrete and Aggregates, 1999, 21(1): 82–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Li H, Zhuge L, Shi S et al. Hydration products of fly ash based cementing material activated by NaOH [J]. Journal of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2012, 40(2): 234–239.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rattanasak U, Chindaprasirt P. Influence of NaOH solution on the synthesis of fly ash geopolymer[J]. Minerals Engineering, 2009, 22(12): 1073–1078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ridtirud C, Chindaprasirt P, Pimraksa K. Factors affecting the shrinkage of fly ash geopolymers [J]. International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy, and Materials, 2011, 18(1): 100–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haiyan Du  (杜海燕).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Du, H., Yang, L., Gao, W. et al. Effects of characteristics of fly ash on the properties of geopolymer. Trans. Tianjin Univ. 22, 261–267 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12209-016-2769-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12209-016-2769-9

Keywords

Navigation