Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Integrated Building Envelope Design Process Combining Parametric Modelling and Multi-Objective Optimization

  • Research article
  • Published:
Transactions of Tianjin University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As an important element in sustainable building design, the building envelope has been witnessing a constant shift in the design approach. Integrating multi-objective optimization (MOO) into the building envelope design process is very promising, but not easy to realize in an actual project due to several factors, including the complexity of optimization model construction, lack of a dynamic-visualization capacity in the simulation tools and consideration of how to match the optimization with the actual design process. To overcome these difficulties, this study constructed an integrated building envelope design process (IBEDP) based on parametric modelling, which was implemented using Grasshopper platform and interfaces to control the simulation software and optimization algorithm. A railway station was selected as a case study for applying the proposed IBEDP, which also utilized a grid-based variable design approach to achieve flexible optimum fenestrations. To facilitate the stepwise design process, a novel strategy was proposed with a two-step optimization, which optimized various categories of variables separately. Compared with a one-step optimization, though the proposed strategy performed poorly in the diversity of solutions, the quantitative assessment of the qualities of Pareto-optimum solution sets illustrates that it is superior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brownlee AEI, Wright JA (2012) Solution analysis in multi-objective optimization. In: IBPSA-ENGLAND: first building simulation and optimization conference. Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK, pp 317–324

  2. Wang W, Zmeureanu R, Rivard H (2005) Applying multi-objective genetic algorithms in green building design optimization. Build Environ 40(11):1512–1525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Asadi E, Da Silva MG, Antunes CH et al (2012) Multi-objective optimization for building retrofit strategies: a model and an application. Energy Build 44:81–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bénabes J, Bennis F, Poirson E et al (2010) Interactive optimization strategies for layout problems. Int J Interact Des Manuf 4(3):181–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Del Río-Cidoncha MG, Iglesias JE, Martínez-Palacios J (2007) A comparison of floor plan design strategies in architecture and engineering. Autom Constr 16(5):559–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yan W, Asl MR, Su Z et al (2015) Towards multi-objective optimization for sustainable buildings with both quantifiable and non-quantifiable design objectives. In: Sustainable human-building ecosystems: 1st international symposium on sustainable human-building ecosystems. American Society of Civil Engineers, Pittsburgh, USA, pp 223–230

  7. Hopfe CJ (2009) Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis in building performance simulation for decision support and design optimization. Department of the Built Environment, Eindhoven University, Eindhoven, the Netherlands

  8. Eisenhower B, O’Neill Z, Narayanan S et al (2012) A methodology for meta-model based optimization in building energy models. Energy Build 47:292–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Su Z, Yan W (2015) Creating and improving a closed loop: design optimization and knowledge discovery in architecture. Int J Archit Comput 13(2):123–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Caldas LG, Norford LK (2002) A design optimization tool based on a genetic algorithm. Autom Constr 11(2):173–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Suga K, Kato S, Hiyama K (2010) Structural analysis of Pareto-optimal solution sets for multi-objective optimization: an application to outer window design problems using multiple objective genetic algorithms. Build Environ 45(5):1144–1152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yi YK, Malkawi AM (2009) Optimizing building form for energy performance based on hierarchical geometry relation. Autom Constr 18(6):825–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Caldas L (2008) Generation of energy-efficient architecture solutions applying GENE_ARCH: an evolution-based generative design system. Adv Eng Inform 22(1):59–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wright JA, Brownlee A, Mourshed MM et al (2014) Multi-objective optimization of cellular fenestration by an evolutionary algorithm. J Build Perform Simul 7(1):33–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bernal W, Behl M, Nghiem TX et al (2012) MLE+: a tool for integrated design and deployment of energy efficient building controls. In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM workshop on embedded sensing systems for energy-efficiency in buildings. ACM, pp 123–130

  16. Shi X (2011) Design optimization of insulation usage and space conditioning load using energy simulation and genetic algorithm. Energy 36(3):1659–1667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Karaguzel OT, Zhang R, Lam KP (2014) Coupling of whole-building energy simulation and multi-dimensional numerical optimization for minimizing the life cycle costs of office buildings. Build Simul 7(2):111–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shi X, Yang W (2013) Performance-driven architectural design and optimization technique from a perspective of architects. Autom Constr 32:125–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Turrin M, von Buelow P, Stouffs R (2011) Design explorations of performance driven geometry in architectural design using parametric modeling and genetic algorithms. Adv Eng Inform 25(4):656–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Roudsari MS, Pak M, Smith A et al (2013) Ladybug: a parametric environmental plugin for grasshopper to help designers create an environmentally-conscious design. In: Proceedings of the 13th international IBPSA conference. Lyon, France

  21. Asl MR, Stoupine A, Zarrinmehr S et al (2015) Optimo: a BIM-based multi-objective optimization tool utilizing visual programming for high performance building design. In: eCAADe: proceedings of the conference of education and research in computer aided architectural design in europe. eCAADe and TU Wien, Vienna, Austria, pp 673–682

  22. Nembrini J, Samberger S, Sternitzke A et al (2012) Combining sensitivity analysis with parametric modeling to inform early design. In: SCS: proceedings of the 2012 symposium on simulation for architecture and urban design. Orlando, USA, pp 39–46

  23. Nabil A (2005) Useful daylight illuminance: a new paradigm for assessing daylight in buildings. Light Res Technol 37(1):41–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51338006).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Architecture, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072, China

    Dan Hou, Gang Liu, Qi Zhang, Lixiong Wang & Rui Dang

Authors
  1. Dan Hou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gang Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Qi Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lixiong Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Rui Dang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gang Liu.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 260 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hou, D., Liu, G., Zhang, Q. et al. Integrated Building Envelope Design Process Combining Parametric Modelling and Multi-Objective Optimization. Trans. Tianjin Univ. 23, 138–146 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12209-016-0022-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12209-016-0022-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation