Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of environmental impacts of traction motor production and disposal

  • Published:
Transactions of Tianjin University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

By the application of life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology, this paper estimates the environmental impacts of production and disposal of traction motors used in electric vehicles in China. The results show that the total energy use, the criteria emissions and the greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions of a traction motor production and disposal are about 2,899,MJ, 4.5,kg and 259.5,kg per motor, respectively. Among the regulated emissions, the SO x emission ranks first by total mass, followed by CO, PM10, NO x , PM2.5, and volatile organic compound (VOC). The motor material production stage accounts for most of the energy consumption and emissions, followed by the assembly stage and the end-of-life disposal stage. In this study, the environmental performance analysis is extended to the comparison between the use of secondary material and primary material for the material production stage. It is found that using 100% secondary material results in a 52.9% reduction in energy consumption, a 49.8% reduction in regulated emissions, and a 49.3% reduction in GHG emissions compared with the use of 100% primary material.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. International Energy Agency (IEA). World Energy Outlook 2011 [R]. 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (CDIAC). People’s Republic of China Fossil-Fuel CO2 Emissions [EB/OL]. http://cdiac.ornl.gov/trends/emis/tre_prc.html, 2009-10-12.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ou X, Zhang X, Chan S. Alternative fuel buses currently in use in China: Life-cycle fossil energy use, GHG emissions and policy recommendations [J]. Energy Policy, 2010, 38(1): 406–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. State Council of China. “Twelfth Five-year” National Strategic Emerging Industry Development Plan [R]. 2012(in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bonollo F, Carturan I, Cupito G et al. Life cycle assessment in the automotive industry: Comparison between aluminium and cast iron cylinder blocks [J]. Metallurgical Science and Technology, 2006, 24(2): 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Li S, Li N, Li J et al. Vehicle cycle energy and carbon dioxide analysis of passenger car in China [J]. AASRI Procedia, 2012, 2: 25–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Simões C L, Pinto L M C, Bernardo C A. Modelling the environmental performance of composite products: Benchmark with traditional materials [J]. Materials and Design, 2012, 39: 121–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Burnham A, Wang M, Wu Y. Development and Applications of GREET 2.7-The Transportation Vehicle-Cycle Model [M]. Energy Systems Division, Argonne National Laboratory, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  9. International Standard Organisation. ISO 14040: 1997 Environmental Management — Life Cycle Assessment-Principles and Framework [S]. Geneva, Switzerland, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Michalek J J, Chester M, Jaramillo P et al. Valuation of plug-in vehicle life-cycle air emissions and oil displacement benefits [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2011, 108(40): 16554–16558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. International Standard Organisation. ISO 14043: 2000 Environmental Management — Life Cycle Assessment-Life Cycle Interpretation [S]. Geneva, Switzerland, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gao L, Winfield Z C. Life cycle assessment of environmental and economic impacts of advanced vehicles [J]. Energies, 2012, 5(3): 605–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Vinodh S, Jayakrishna K. Environmental impact minimisation in an automotive component using alternative materials and manufacturing processes [J]. Materials and Design, 2011, 32(10): 5082–5090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Weiss M A, Heywood J B, Schafer A et al. Comparative Assessment of Fuel Cell Cars [R]. MIT Report LFEE 2003-001 RP, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schuckert M, Saur K, Florin H et al. Life cycle analysis: Getting the total picture on vehicle engineering alternatives [J]. Automotive Engineering, 1996, 104(3): 49–52.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dubreuil A, Bushi L, Das S et al. A comparative life cycle assessment of magnesium front end autoparts [C]. In: SAE 2010-01-0275, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bossel U. Well-to-Wheel Studies, Heating Values, and the Energy Conservation Principle [R]. European Fuel Cell Forum, Switzerland, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Maduro M. Well-to-Wheel Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Energy Electrified Vehicles in Canada and the U. S. [D]. University of Ontario Institute of Technology, CA, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  19. International Standard Organisation. ISO 14040:2006 Environmental Management — Life Cycle Assessment-Principles and Framework [S]. Geneva, Switzerland, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  20. International Standard Organisation. ISO 14044:2006 Environmental Management — Life Cycle Assessment-Requirements and Guidelines [S]. Geneva, Switzerland, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  21. China National Standard. GB/T 24040-2008 Environmental Management — Life Cycle Assessment-Principles and Framework [S]. Beijing, China, 2008 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  22. China National Standard. GB/T 24044-2008 Environmental Management — Life Cycle Assessment-Requirements and Guidelines [S]. Beijing, China, 2008 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lipman T E, Delucchi M A. Emissions of nitrous oxide and methane from conventional and alternative fuel motor vehicles [J]. Climatic Change, 2002, 53(4): 477–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. GREET. GREET model[EB/OL]. http://greet.es.anl.gov/, 2009-10-12.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Editing Committee of China Electric Power Yearbook. China Electric Power Yearbook 2010 [M]. China Electric Power Press, Beijing, 2010 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). IPCC Fourth Assessment Report: Climate Change 2007 [R]. 2007.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jun Li  (李 君).

Additional information

Supported by National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (“863” Program, No. 2011AA11A288).

Li Shuhua, born in 1989, female, doctorate student.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, S., Li, J., Li, N. et al. Evaluation of environmental impacts of traction motor production and disposal. Trans. Tianjin Univ. 19, 413–418 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12209-013-2106-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12209-013-2106-5

Keywords

Navigation