Skip to main content
Log in

A non-canonical example to support P is not equal to NP

  • Published:
Transactions of Tianjin University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The more unambiguous statement of the P versus NP problem and the judgement of its hardness, are the key ways to find the full proof of the P versus NP problem. There are two sub-problems in the P versus NP problem. The first is the classifications of different mathematical problems (languages), and the second is the distinction between a non-deterministic Turing machine (NTM) and a deterministic Turing machine (DTM). The process of an NTM can be a power set of the corresponding DTM, which proves that the states of an NTM can be a power set of the corresponding DTM. If combining this viewpoint with Cantor’s theorem, it is shown that an NTM is not equipotent to a DTM. This means that “generating the power set P(A) of a set A” is a non-canonical example to support that P is not equal to NP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cook S. The P versus NP Problem. Official Problem Description[EB/OL]. http://www.claymath.org/millennium/P_vs_NP/pvsnp.pdf, 2000.

  2. Encyclopaedia of China: Electronics and Computer[M]. Encyclopaedia of China Publishing House, Beijing, 1986 (in Chinese).

  3. The Clay Mathematics Institute. P vs NP Problem [EB/OL]., http://www.,claymath.,org/millennium/P_vs_NP/, 2000.

  4. Smale S. Mathematical problems for the next century[J]. Mathematical Intelligencer, 1998, 20(2): 7–15.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Seife C. What are the limits of conventional computing?[J]. Science, 2005, 309(5731): 96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gasarch W I. The P=?NP poll[J]. SIGACT News, 2002, 33(2): 34–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Allender E. A status report on the P versus NP question[J]. Advances in Computers, 2009, 77: 117–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fortnow L. The status of the P versus NP problem[J]. Communications of the ACM, 2009, 52(9): 78–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cook S. The importance of the P versus NP question[J]. Journal of the ACM, 2003, 50(1): 27–29.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Gassner C. Oracles and relativizations of the P =? NP question for several structures[J]. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 2009, 15(6): 1186–1205.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Manea F, Margenstern M, Mitrana V et al. A new characterization of NP, P, and PSPACE with accepting hybrid networks of evolutionary processors[J]. Theory of Computing Systems, 2010, 46(2): 174–192.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Mukund M. NP-Completeness not the same as separating P from NP[J]. Communications of the ACM, 2009, 52(4): 9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kuratowski K, Mostowski A. Set Theory[M]. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hazewinkel M. Encyclopaedia of Mathematics: An Updated and Annotated Translation of the Soviet “Mathematical Encyclopaedia”[M]. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hopcroft J E, Motwani R M, Ullman J D. Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages and Computation[M]. 3 edition. Addison Wesley, New Jersey, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Garey M R, Johnson D S. Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness[M]. New York: W. H. Freeman, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nondeterministic, Turing, Machine[EB/OL]., http://mathworld.wolfram.com/NondeterministicTuringMachine.html, 2011.

  18. Chaitin G J. Information-theoretic computational complexity [J]. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 1974, 20(1): 10–15.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Encyclopaedia of China: Mathematics[M]. Encyclopaedia of China Publishing House, Beijing, 1988 (in Chinese).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhengling Yang  (杨正瓴).

Additional information

YANG Zhengling, born in 1964, male, Dr, associate Prof.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yang, Z. A non-canonical example to support P is not equal to NP. Trans. Tianjin Univ. 17, 446–449 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12209-011-1593-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12209-011-1593-5

Keywords

Navigation