Abstract
Considering the effects of particle crushing and intermediate principal stress on material yielding strength, the spatial mobilization plane (SMP) yielding criterion and state parameter model including a general critical state line are selected in the analysis of cylindrical cavity expansion. Meanwhile, combining Rowe’s flow rule and Bolton’s simplification to stress-dilatancy relationship to reflect soil shear dilatancy and softening behavior, this paper analyzes the problem of cylindrical cavity expansion in sand by discretizing the plastic zone, which is applicable to cavity expansions from zero initial radius and finite initial radius simultaneously and can determine stress field, strain field and limit cavity pressure. A series of comparative analyses are made with the results ignoring crushing and based on Mohr-Coulomb criterion to examine the effects of crushing as well as the coupled effects of crushing and intermediate principal stress on cavity expansion. Results indicate that crushing causes a reduction in limit cavity pressure and void ratio, and results in less stiff response in expansion curves, the amounts of which increase with initial density and mean effective stress. The consideration of crushing can weaken the effects of intermediate principal stress on expansion, while the consideration of intermediate principal stress makes crushing effects become more prominent. The limit cavity pressure can be reduced by over 40% for dense sand with high initial stress based on SMP criterion when crushing is considered.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Li Bo, Luan Maotian. Theoretical analysis of expansion cylindrical cavity based on SMP criterion[J]. Journal of Dalian University of Technology, 2006, 46(2): 246–251 (in Chinese).
Russell A R, Khalili N. Drained cavity expansion in sands exhibiting particle crushing[J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2002, 26(4): 323–340.
Stake M. Stress-deformation and strength characteristics of soils under three difference principal stresses (Discussion)[ J]. Proc of Japan Soc of Civil Eng, 1976, 246: 137–138.
Salgado R, Randolph M F. Analysis of cavity expansion in sand[J]. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2001, 1(2): 175–192.
Luo Ting, Yao Yangping, Matsuoka H. Soil strength equation in plane strain based on SMP[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2000, 21(4): 390–393 (in Chinese).
Been K, Jefferies M G. A state parameter for sands[J]. Geotechnique, 1985, 35(2): 99–112.
Hao Dongxue, Luan Maotian, Chen Rong. Rigorous numerical analysis of cylindrical cavity expansion in sands based on SMP criterion[C]. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Geotechnical Engineering for Disaster Mitigation and Rehabilitation. Nanjing, China, 2008. 1055–1060.
Bolton M D. The strength and dilatancy of sands[J]. Geotechnique, 1986, 36(1): 65–78.
Rowe P. The stress-dilatancy relation for static equilibrium of an assembly of particles in contact[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society, 1962, 269(1339): 500–527.
Salgado R, Mitchel J K, Jamiolkowski M. Cavity expansion and penetration resistance in sand[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 1997, 123(8): 726–735.
Hardin B, Black W. Shear modulus and damping in soils[J]. J Soil Mechs Found Div, 1968, 94(2): 353–369.
Yu H S, Cater J P. Rigorous similarity solutions for cavity expansion in cohesive-frictional soils[J]. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2002, 2(2): 233–258.
Russell A R, Khalili N. On the problem of cavity expansion in unsaturated soils[J]. Computational Mechanics, 2006, 37(4): 311–330.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 50639010) and PhD Start-up Research Fund of Northeast Dianli University (2010).
HAO Dongxue, born in 1981, female, Dr.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hao, D., Luan, M., Li, B. et al. Numerical analysis of cylindrical cavity expansion in sand considering particle crushing and intermediate principal stress. Trans. Tianjin Univ. 16, 68–74 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12209-010-0013-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12209-010-0013-6