Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of modeling range on structural analysis for powerhouse of hydroelectric power plant by FEM

  • Published:
Transactions of Tianjin University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, three different modeling ranges were selected in the structural analysis for a hydropower house. The analysis was carried out using ABAQUS 6.6. The modeling range has a remarkable effect on finite element method (FEM) calculation result at the middle position of typical cross-sections where the concrete is relatively thin, and at the region close to turbine floor. If the ventilation barrel, floor slabs and columns above turbine floor are excluded from FEM model, the maximum rise difference of pedestal structure increases by about 24% compared with that of the whole model. It is indicated that different modeling ranges indeed affect FEM calculation result, and the structure above turbine floor in the FEM model should be included.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Owen D R J, Hinton E. Finite Elements in Plasticity: Theory and Practice [M]. Pineridge Press Limited, Swansea, UK, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wu Hegao, Jiang Kuichao, Shen Yan et al. Threedimensional nonlinear finite element static calculation of complete bearing spiral case [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2006, 37(11): 1323–1328(in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jiang Kuichao. Structural Study on Complete Bearing Spiral Case in Three Gorges Hydropower Station [D]. College of Water Resources and Hydroelectric Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 2007(in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang Cunhui, Zhang Yunliang, Ma Zhenyue. Damage analysis of reinforced concrete surrounding the spiral case under the action of repeated water pressure [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2008, 39(11): 1262–1266(in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chen Qin, Lin Shaozhong, Su Haidong. Three-dimensional nonlinear analysis on directly embedded spiral case of large-scale turbine unit with various measures of restricting cracks [J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2008, 25(6): 101–105(in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chen Qin, Su Haidong, Cui Jianhua et al. Crack analysis on spiral case structure of large-scale turbine units with different embedded manners [J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2009, 26(4): 40–43(in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jiang Kuichao, Wu Hegao, Shen Yan. Three-dimensional nonlinear analysis of complete bearing spiral case without cushion [J]. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 2007, 26(1): 71–76(in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wu Hegao, Shen Yan, Jiang Kuichao. Structural research on embedment of a bare deflated spiral case [J]. Wuhan University Journal of Natural Sciences, 2007, 12(2): 311–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kang Jingfu, Sun Shaojie. 3-D nonlinear analysis on the spiral casing structure of Xilongchi Pumped-Storage Hydropower Station [J]. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 2007, 26(5): 42–46(in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shen Yan, Wu Hegao, Jiang Kuichao. Research on preloading filling spiral case structure in large pumped storage power station [J]. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Natural Science), 2008, 36(5): 97–99 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang Qiling, Wu Hegao, Jiang Kuichao. Comparison of embedding types used in sheet-metal spiral case using damage theory [J]. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Natural Science), 2008, 36(6): 122–124(in Chinese).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Wu Hegao, Huang Xiaoyan, Zhang Qiling et al. Mechanical characteristics and bearing capacity of complete bearing spiral case in hydropower station [J]. Journal of Tianjin University, 2008, 41(7): 777–782(in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lubliner J, Oliver J, Oller S et al. A plastic-damage model for concrete [J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 1989, 25(3): 299–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee J, Fenves G L. Plastic-damage model for cyclic loading of concrete structures [J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 1998, 124(8): 892–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Northwest Hydroelectric Investigation and Design Institute. SL/T 191-96 Design Code for Hydraulic Concrete Structures[S]. China Water Conservancy and Hydropower Press, Beijing, 1997(in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hegao Wu  (伍鹤皋).

Additional information

Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 50539010).

ZHANG Qiling, born in 1982, male, doctorate student

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, Q., Wu, H. & Yang, H. Effect of modeling range on structural analysis for powerhouse of hydroelectric power plant by FEM. Trans. Tianjin Univ. 15, 388–392 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12209-009-0068-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12209-009-0068-4

Keywords

Navigation