Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical simulation of water mitigation effects on shock wave with SPH method

  • Published:
Transactions of Tianjin University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The water mitigation effect on the propagation of shock wave was investigated numerically. The traditional smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) method was modified based on Riemann solution. The comparison of numerical results with the analytical solution indicated that the modified SPH method has more advantages than the traditional SPH method. Using the modified SPH algorithm, a series of one-dimensional planar wave propagation problems were investigated, focusing on the influence of the air-gap between the high-pressure air and water and the thickness of water. The numerical results showed that water mitigation effect is significant. Up to 60% shock wave pressure reduction could be achieved with the existence of water, and the shape of shock wave was also changed greatly. It is seemly that the small air-gap between the high-pressure air and water has more influence on water mitigation effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wingerden K, Bakke J R. Water Sprays for Mitigation of Gaseous Explosions in Offshore Modules [R]. DE94777315, 1992.

  2. Wingerden K. Mitigation of gas explosions using water deluge [J]. Process Safety Progress, 2000, 19(3): 173–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Liu Xuanya, Lu Shouxiang, Zhang Li et al. The experimental study of mitigation of gas explosion by water sprays [C]. In: 2002 International Symposium on Safety Science and Technology (ISSST). Tai’an, China, 2002. Vol.3-Part B, 1301–1306.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hansen O R, Wilkins B A, Eckhoff K. Mitigation and prevention of hydrocarbon explosions by micromist water inerting [C]. In: Major Hazards Offshore Conference, 2003. 51–59.

  5. Jones S J, Averill A F, Ingram J M et al. Mitigation of hydrogen-air explosions using fine water mist sprays [C]. In: Symposium on Hazards XIX Process Safety and Environmental Protection. Manchester, Great Britain, 2006. 440–447.

  6. Keenan W A, Wager P C. Mitigation of confined explosion effects by placing water in proximity of explosives [C]. In: The 25th DoD Explosives Safety Seminar. Anaheim, California, USA, 1992.

  7. Forsen R, Hanssan H, Carlberg C. Small scale tests on mitigation effects of water in a model of the KLOTZ club tunnel in Aelvdalen [C]. In: The 27th DoD Explosives Safety Seminar. Las Vegas, USA, 1997.

  8. Forsen R, Hansson H, Carlberg A. Large Scale Test on Mitigation Effects of Water in the KLOTZ Club Installation in Aelvdalen[R]. PB97209662, 1997.

  9. Hansson H, Forsen R. Mitigation Effects of Water on Ground Shock: Large Scale Testing in Aelvdalen [R]. PB97206965, 1997.

  10. Malvar L J, Tancreto J E. Analytical and tests results for water mitigation of explosion effects [C]. In: The 28th DoD Explosives Safety Seminar. Orlando, Florida, USA, 1998.

  11. Hong K, Chin L H. Water Mitigation Free Field Tests [R]. ETSC Pretest Report V. Ministry of Defence of Singapore, Lands and Estates Organization, 1998.

  12. Birnbaum N K, Fairlie G E, Francis N J. Numerical modeling of small scale water mitigation feasibility tests [C]. In: Proceedings of the 28th Department of Defence Explosives Safety Seminar. Orlando, FL, USA, 1998.

  13. Chong W K, Lam K Y, Yeo K S et al. A comparison of simulation’s results with experiment on water mitigation of an explosion [J]. J Shock Vibration, 1999(6): 73–80.

  14. Cheng M, Liu Z J, Hung K C et al. Blast wave mitigation by water wall [C]. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Protection of Structures Against Hazards. Singapore, 2002. 153–158.

  15. Zhao Hanzhong. Water effects on shock wave delay in free field [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2001, 21(1):26–28(in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Liu M B, Liu G R, Lam K Y. Investigations into water mitigation using a meshless particle method [J]. Shock Waves, Earth and Environmental Science, Engineering and Physics and Astronomy, Nov. 2002, 12(3):181–195.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lucy L A. Numerical approach to testing the fission hypothesis [J]. Astron J, 1977, 82(2): 1013–1024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gingold R A, Monaghan J J. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics: Theory and application to non-spherical stars [J]. MNRAS, 1977, 181: 375–389.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Xu Zhihong, Tang Wenhui, Zhang Ruoqi. A modified SPH method based on Riemann solution [J]. Chinese Journal of Computational Physics, 2006(6): 713–716(in Chinese).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yiming Mao  (毛틦쏷).

Additional information

Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China ( No. 50638030 and 50525825) and National Science and Technology Support Program (No.2006BAJ13B02).

MAO Yiming, born in 1969, male, M, lecturer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mao, Y., Fang, Q., Zhang, Y. et al. Numerical simulation of water mitigation effects on shock wave with SPH method. Trans. Tianjin Univ. 14, 387–390 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12209-008-0066-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12209-008-0066-y

Keywords

Navigation