Skip to main content
Log in

Compressive strength of hydrostatic-stress-sensitive materials at high strain-rates

  • Published:
Transactions of Tianjin University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many engineering materials demonstrate dynamic enhancement of their compressive strength with the increase of strain-rate, which have been included in material models to improve the reliability of numerical simulations of the material and structural responses under impact and blast loads. The strain-rate effects on the dynamic compressive strength of a range of engineering materials which behave in hydrostatic-stress-sensitive manner were investigated. It is concluded that the dynamic enhancement of the compressive strength of a hydrostatic-stress-sensitive material may include inertia-induced lateral confinement effects, which, as a non-strain-rate factor, may greatly enhance the compressive strength of these materials. Some empirical formulae based on the dynamic stress-strain measurements over-predict the strain-rate effects on the compressive strength of these hydrostatic-stress-sensitive materials, and thus may over-estimate the structural resistance to impact and blast loads, leading to non-conservative design of protective structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Drucker D C. Plasticity theory, strength-differential (SD) phenomenon, and volume expansion in metals and plastics [J]. Metall Trans, 1973, 4: 667–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lu Y B. About Strain-Rate Effects on Hydrostatic-Stress-Sensitive Materials in a Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar Test [R]. The University of Manchester, Second Year Progression Report, 2008.

  3. Chen W, Lu F, Cheng M. Tension and compression tests of two polymers under quasi-static and dynamic loading [J]. Polym Test, 2002, 21: 113–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Richeton J, Ahzi S, Daridon L et al. A formulation of the cooperative model for the yield stress of amorphous polymers for a wide range of strain rates and temperatures [J]. Polym, 2005, 46: 6035–6043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mulliken A D, Boyce M C. Mechanics of the ratedependent elastic-plastic deformation of glassy polymers from low to high strain rates [J]. Int J Solids Struct, 2006, 43: 1331–1356.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Duan Y, Saigal A, Greif R et al. Impact behavior and modeling of engineering polymers [J]. Polym Eng Sci, 2003, 43: 112–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Li Z H, Lambros J. Strain rate effects on the thermomechanical behavior of polymers [J]. Int J Solids Struct, 2001, 38: 3549–3562.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Nizar M M, Masaki O, Hirotsugu I et al. Impact behavior analysis of PC/ABS (50/50) blends [J]. Key Eng Mater, 2005, 297–300: 1297–1302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Blumenthal W R, Cady C M, Lopez M F et al. Influence of temperature and strain rate on the compressive behavior of PMMA and polycarbonate polymers [M]. In: Furnish M D, Thadani N N, Horie Y Edited. Shock Compression of Condensed Matter. American Institute Phys, Melville, NY, 2002. 665–668.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Siviour C R, Walley S M, Proud W G et al. The high strain rate compressive behavior of polycarbonate and polyvinylidene difluoride [J]. Polym, 2005, 46: 12546–12555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rittel D, Brill A. Dynamic flow and failure of confined polymethylmethacylate [J]. J Mech Phys Solids, 2008, 56(4): 1401–1416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Davies E D H, Hunter S C. The dynamic compression testing of solids by the method of the split Hopkinson bar [J]. J Mech Phys Solids, 1963, 11: 155–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Forrestal M J, Wright T W, Chen W. The effect of radial inertia on brittle samples during the split Hopkinson pressure bar test [J]. Int J Impact Eng, 2007, 34: 405–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Li Q M, Meng H. About the dynamic strength enhancement of concrete-like materials in a split Hopkinson pressure bar test [J]. Int J Solids Struct, 2003, 40: 343–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Comite Euro-International du Beton. CEB-FIP Model Code 1990 [M]. Redwood Books, Trowbridge, Wiltshire, UK, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang M, Wu H J, Li Q M et al. Further investigation on the dynamic compressive strength enhancement of concrete-like materials based on split Hopkinson pressure bar tests (Part I): Experiments [J]. Int J Impact Eng, 2008 (in Press).

  17. Grote D L, Park S W, Zhou M. Dynamic behavior of concrete at high strain-rates and pressures(I): Experimental characterization [J]. Int J Impact Eng, 2001, 25: 869–886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Malvern L E, Ross C A. Dynamic Response of Concrete and Concrete Structures [R]. Second Annual Technical Report 1985, AFOSR Contract No. F49620-83-K007.

  19. Tedesco J W, Ross C A. Strain-rate-dependent constitutive equations for concrete [J]. ASME J Press Vessel Technol, 1998, 120: 398–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Q. M. Li.

Additional information

LI Q M, born in 1962, male, Dr, reader.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, Q.M., Lu, Y.B. Compressive strength of hydrostatic-stress-sensitive materials at high strain-rates. Trans. Tianjin Univ. 14, 324–328 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12209-008-0055-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12209-008-0055-1

Keywords

Navigation