Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Neurometric and biometric measurement of the effectiveness of covid-19-related public service announcements

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research aims to examine the effects of public service advertisements on individuals in Turkey in order to ensure vaccine acceptance during the pandemic. For the relevant objective, a mixed methodology was utilized. In the first phase of the research, 25 public service announcements published during the pandemic were subjected to a classical rhetorical analysis to emphasize the discourse strategy that they reflect. Rhetorical analysis revealed that 46.16% of the examined PSAs feature logical discourse (logos), 29.5% feature emotional discourse (pathos), and 22.2% feature moral discourse (ethos). In the second phase of the research, neurometric (EEG) and biometric (GSR, Eye Tracking) measurement instruments were used to assess the impact of each persuasion strategy identified through rhetorical analysis on individuals. The results of an experiment with 69 participants showed that the emotional discourses (pathos) in PSAs have a greater impact on viewers’ cognitive performance and attention. In particular, it was determined that the n400 potential was activated in the brains of the participants in response to PSAs which represent pathos rhetoric, and that their biometric responses based on eye movements and electrification on the skin differed in the 400–600 ms range. Consequently, it is anticipated that the current study will benefit from two aspects. First, within the scope of the examined literature, this study is the first to combine neurometric measurement with a rhetorically-based qualitative analysis. It is anticipated that the related mixed methodology will offer researchers an alternative viewpoint. Second, it is anticipated that the findings will contribute to the understanding of how society can be persuaded to adopt the appropriate behavior patterns in situations such as a global pandemic, as well as the impact of discourse strategies on individuals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdollahimajd, F., Shahidi-Dadras, M., Robati, R. M., & Dadkhahfar, S. (2020). Management of pemphigus in COVID-19 pandemic era; a review article. Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine, 8(1).

  • Açikgöz, Ö., & Günay, A. (2020). The early impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on the global and Turkish economy. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, 50(9), 520–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansell, C., Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2021). The COVID-19 pandemic as a game changer for public administration and leadership? The need for robust governance responses to turbulent problems. Public Management Review, 23(7), 949–960.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anttiroiko, A. V. (2021). Successful government responses to the pandemic: Contextualizing national and urban responses to the COVID-19 outbreak in east and west. International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR), 10(2), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, T., & Olatunji, B. O. (2012). Eye tracking of attention in the affective disorders: A meta-analytic review and synthesis. Clinical Psychology Review, 32(8), 704–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aslan, I., Ochnik, D., & Çınar, O. (2020). Exploring perceived stress among students in Turkey during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(23), 8961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baños-González, M., Rajas-Fernández, M., & Sutil-Martín, D. L. (2021). Analysis of emotion and recall in COVID-19 advertisements: A neuroscientific study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(16), 8721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bari, D. S. (2020). Gender differences in tonic and phasic electrodermal activity components. Science Journal of University of Zakho, 8(1), 29–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bui, B., Moses, O., & Dumay, J. (2022). The rhetoric of New Zealand’s COVID-19 response. Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, 35(1), 186–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cairney, P., & Wellstead, A. (2021). COVID-19: Effective policymaking depends on trust in experts, politicians, and the public. Policy Design and Practice, 4(1), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartocci, G., Caratù, M., Modica, E., Maglione, A. G., Rossi, D., Cherubino, P., & Babiloni, F. (2017). Electroencephalographic, heart rate, and galvanic skin response assessment for an advertising perception study: Application to antismoking public service announcements. JoVE (Journal of Visualized Experiments), 126, e55872.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, C. Y., Zhang, W. J., & Zhang, Q. (2022). Authority-led conspiracy theories in China during the COVID-19 pandemic–exploring the thematic features and rhetoric strategies. Convergence, 28(4), 1172–1197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cope, E. M., & Sandys, J. E. (Eds.). (2010). Aristotle: Rhetoric (Vol. 2). Cambridge University Press.

  • Coşkun, H., Yıldırım, N., & Gündüz, S. (2021). The spread of COVID-19 virus through population density and wind in Turkey cities. Science of the Total Environment, 751, 141663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, J. P., & Smith, F. T. (2008). The dynamics of persuasion. Int J Math Models Methods Appl Sci, 2(1), 115–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demirbilek, Y., Pehlivantürk, G., Özgüler, Z., & Meşe, E. A. (2020). COVID-19 outbreak control, example of ministry of health of Turkey. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, 50(9), 489–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhengre, A. B., Mankar, V., Bhoyar, K. K., & Chandi, D. H. (2022). Impact of rumors or misinformation on Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) in Social Media. Int J Health Sci, 53, 412–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elden, S. (2005). Reading logos as speech: Heidegger, Aristotle and rhetorical politics. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 38(4), 281–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Everett, J. A., Colombatto, C., Chituc, V., Brady, W. J., & Crockett, M. (2020). The effectiveness of moral messages on public health behavioral intentions during the COVID-19 pandemic. PsyArXiv, September 23. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9yqs8.

  • Fabi, S., & Leuthold, H. (2018). Racial bias in empathy: Do we process dark-and fair-colored hands in pain differently? An EEG study. Neuropsychologia, 114, 143–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G* power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández, A. B., González, M. B., & Fernández, M. R. (2023). Relation between emotions and Memory Relate in Public Service Advertising Campaigns. A study based on a Neuroscience Approach (pp. 1–32). Revista Latina de Comunicación Social. 81.

  • Garrett, L. (2020). COVID-19: The medium is the message. The Lancet, 395(10228), 942–943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glowka, K. (2023). The rhetoric of visual representations: Visualizing the COVID-19 pandemic in Polish media. COVID Communication: Exploring pandemic discourse (pp. 89–99). Springer International Publishing.

  • Gomaa, W. H., & Fahmy, A. A. (2013). A survey of text similarity approaches. International Journal of Computer Applications, 68(13), 13–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Górska, A., Dobija, D., Grossi, G., & Staniszewska, Z. (2022). Getting through COVID-19 together: Understanding local governments’ social media communication. Cities, 121, 103453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, S. E. Jr., Babb, M., & Alpaslan, C. M. (2008). Institutional field dynamics and the competition between institutional logics: The role of rhetoric in the evolving control of the modern corporation. Management Communication Quarterly, 22(1), 40–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, F. (2005). Distinguishing between feelings and emotions in understanding communication effects. Journal of Business Research, 58(10), 1426–1436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heffner, J., Vives, M. L., & FeldmanHall, O. (2021). Emotional responses to prosocial messages increase willingness to self-isolate during the COVID-19 pandemic. Personality and Individual Differences, 170, 110420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, P. (2017). Literature and emotion. Routledge.

  • Hoque, Z., Mai, K., & Ozdil, E. (2022). Accounting as rhetorical devices during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from Australian universities. Journal of Public Budgeting Accounting & Financial Management, 34(6), 168–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou, Z., Du, F., Jiang, H., Zhou, X., & Lin, L. (2020). Assessment of public attention, risk perception, emotional and behavioural responses to the COVID-19 outbreak: Social media surveillance in China. MedRxiv, 2020–2003.

  • İkiışık, H., Sezerol, A., Taşçı, M., Y., & Maral, I. (2021). COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: A community‐based research in Turkey. International Journal of Clinical Practice, 75(8), e14336.

  • Jiménez-Sánchez, Á., Margalina, V. M., & Vayas-Ruiz, E. (2020). Governmental communication and brand advertising during the COVID-19 pandemic. Tripodos, 2(47), 29–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krafka, K., Khosla, A., Kellnhofer, P., Kannan, H., Bhandarkar, S., Matusik, W., & Torralba, A. (2016). Eye tracking for everyone. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (pp. 2176–2184).

  • Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, C. U. (1989). Persuasion: Reception and responsibility. Wadsworth Publishing Company, 10 Davis Drive, Belmont, CA 94002.

  • Lau, E. F., Phillips, C., & Poeppel, D. (2008). A cortical network for semantics:(de) constructing the N400. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(12), 920–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorch, E. P., Palmgreen, P., Donohew, L., Helm, D., Baer, S. A., & Dsilva, M. U. (1994). Program context, sensation seeking, and attention to televised anti-drug public service announcements. Human Communication Research, 20(3), 390–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luck, S. J. (2014). An introduction to the event-related potential technique (2. Basım). MIT Press.

  • Marco-Franco, J. E., Pita-Barros, P., Vivas-Orts, D., González-de-Julián, S., & Vivas-Consuelo, D. (2021). COVID-19, fake news, and vaccines: Should regulation be implemented? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(2), 744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M. (2009). Retorik, çev. İsmail Yerguz. Dost Kitabevi Yayınları.

  • Murry, J. P. Jr., Stam, A., & Lastovicka, J. L. (1996). Paid-versus donated-media strategies for public service announcement campaigns. Public Opinion Quarterly, 60(1), 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Keefe, G. J., & Reid, K. (2020). The uses and effects of public service advertising. Public relations research annual (pp. 67–92). Routledge.

  • Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opillard, F., Palle, A., & Michelis, L. (2020). Discourse and Strategic Use of the military in France and Europe in the COVID-19 Crisis. Tijdschrift Voor economische en sociale geografie, 111(3), 239–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panda, D. S., Giri, R. K., Nagarajappa, A. K., & Basha, S. (2021). Covid-19 vaccine, acceptance, and concern of safety from public perspective in the state of Odisha, India. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics, 17(10), 3333–3337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plong, M., Shen, K., Van Vliet, M., Robben, A., Van Hulle, M., & Geurts, L. (2012, January). Accurate visual stimulus presentation software for EEG experiments. In Proceedings of the First Asian Conference on Information Systems.

  • Petty, Richard E., et al. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Springer New York.

  • Rapp, Christof, (2002). Aristoteles, Rhetorik, translation, introduction, and commentary, 2 volumes, Berlin: Akademie Verlag.

  • Rolke, B., Heil, M., Streb, J., & Hennighausen, E. (2001). Missed prime words within the attentional blink evoke an N400 semantic priming effect. Psychophysiology, 38(2), 165–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selfe, R. J., & Selfe, C. L. (2008). Convince me! Valuing multimodal literacies and composing public service announcements. Theory into Practice, 47(2), 83–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shagass, C., Roemer, R. A., & Amadeo, M. (1976). Eye-tracking performance and engagement of attention. Archives of General Psychiatry, 33(1), 121–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherif, C. W., Sherif, M., & Nebergall, R. E. (1965). Attitude and attitude change: The social judgment-involvement approach (pp. 127–167). Philadelphia: Saunders.

  • Shi, Y., Ruiz, N., Taib, R., Choi, E., & Chen, F. (2007, April). Galvanic skin response (GSR) as an index of cognitive load. In CHI’07 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 2651–2656).

  • Smith, V. J. (2007). Aristotle’s classical enthymeme and the visual argumentation of the twenty-first century. Argumentation & Advocacy, 43(3–4), 114–123.

  • Subaşı, S., & Baycan, T. (2022). Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on private rental housing prices in Turkey. Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, 6(3), 1177–1193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Syed Alwi, S. A. R., Rafidah, E., Zurraini, A., Juslina, O., Brohi, I. B., & Lukas, S. (2021). A survey on COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and concern among malaysians. Bmc Public Health, 21(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trichur Venkitasubramanian, M. (2021). Sunny Days Ahead: Messages During a Pandemic: Creative Strategies and Themes in Health and Wellness Public Service Ads by the Ad Council.

  • Wang, T., & Lund, B. (2020). Announcement information provided by United States’ public libraries during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic. Public Library Quarterly, 39(4), 283–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., Lu, S., & Harter, D. (2021). Multi-sensor eye-tracking systems and tools for capturing Student attention and understanding engagement in learning: A review. IEEE Sensors Journal.

  • Westerfield, M., Sejnowski, T. J., Makeig, S., Townsend, J., Jung, T. P., & Courchesne, E. (2001). Analysis and visualization of single-trial event-related potentials.

  • WHO (2023). WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard. Retrieved from: https://covid19.who.int/.

  • Woodman, G. F. (2010). A brief introduction to the use of event-related potentials in studies of perception and attention (Vol. 72, pp. 2031–2046). Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

  • Worldometers (2023). Countries where COVID-19 has spread. Retrieved from: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/countries-where-coronavirus-has-spread/.

  • Wróbel, S. (2015). Logos, ethos, pathos. Classical rhetoric revisited. Polish Sociological Review, 191(3), 401–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynd, C. A., Schmidt, B., & Schaefer, M. A. (2003). Two quantitative approaches for estimating content validity. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 25(5), 508–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, L., & Ren, Y. (2020). Moral obligation, public leadership, and collective action for epidemic prevention and control: Evidence from the corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) emergency. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(8), 2731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, S., & Wan, H. (2018). An event-related potentials on the euphemism construal mechanism in literary expression. NeuroQuantology, 16(6).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Eskişehir Osmangazi University Scientific Research Coordination Office with project number SBA-2021-1662.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Administrative and Social Sciences, Department of Insurance and Social Security, KTO Karatay University, Konya, Türkiye

    Hazal Duman Alptekin

  2. Administrative and Social Sciences, Department of International Trade and Logistics, KTO Karatay University, Konya, Türkiye

    Nihan Tomris Kucun

  3. Eskişehir Osmangazi University Cognitive Behavioral Application and Research Center, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Meselik Campus, Eskisehir, 26480, Turkey

    Merve Kurt

  4. Department of Marketing, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Meselik Campus, Eskisehir, 26480, Turkey

    Behcet Yalin Ozkara

Authors
  1. Hazal Duman Alptekin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nihan Tomris Kucun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Merve Kurt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Behcet Yalin Ozkara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nihan Tomris Kucun.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors would like to state that there is no potential conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alptekin, H.D., Kucun, N.T., Kurt, M. et al. Neurometric and biometric measurement of the effectiveness of covid-19-related public service announcements. Int Rev Public Nonprofit Mark (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-024-00399-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-024-00399-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation