Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Charity donation intention via m-payment apps: donor-related, m-payment system-related, or charity brand-related factors, which one is overkill?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of donor-related factors (e.g., religiosity, and attitude toward helping others), m-payment system-related factors (system trust, and effort expectancy) and charity brand-related factors (a donor-brand engagement model) on the intention to donate via mobile payment applications (m-payment apps) and intention to recommend this function to others. Furthermore, importance-performance map analysis (IPMA) was used to list factors in order of priority to provide managerial insights. 523 donors of prior donation experiences from 9 charity organizations in Tehran participated in this study designed to gauge their intention to donate via m-payment apps and intention to recommend to others. PLS structural equation modeling was used to test the hypotheses of this study. The results indicated that donor-brand engagement, helper’s high, and donor involvement fall into the “maintainˮ quadrant for intention to donate via m-payment apps. Additionally, as religiosity has the lowest importance but relatively high performance, investing in this variable seems to be a wasted effort. Also, m-payment system-related factors have relatively low importance. So, they are not sufficient to motivate donors to donate via m-payment apps. Consequently, charity managers who are interested in expanding online donation via m-payment apps should prioritize improving the performance of the brand-related factors. Although religiosity may affect offline donation, its influence was insignificant in this study. It seems religious donors in this study seek visible or public displays of charity donation. This can be justified by pointing to the conspicuous consumption and need for social status.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Algharabat, R., Rana, N. P., Alalwan, A. A., Baabdullah, A., & Gupta, A. (2020). Investigating the antecedents of customer brand engagement and consumer-based brand equity in social media. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.01.016.

  • Algharabat, R., Rana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., Alalwan, A. A., & Qasem, Z. (2018). The effect of telepresence, social presence and involvement on consumer brand engagement: An empirical study of non-profit organizations. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 40, 139–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alhidari, I. S., Veludo-de-Oliveira, T. M., Yousafzai, S. Y., & Yani-de-Soriano, M. (2018). Modeling the effect of multidimensional trust on individual monetary donations to charitable organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 47(3), 623–644.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allred, A., & Amos, C. (2018). Disgust images and nonprofit children’s causes. Journal of Social Marketing, 8(1), 120–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arli, D., & Lasmono, H. (2015). Are religious people more caring? Exploring the impact of religiosity on charitable organizations in a developing country. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 20(1), 38–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, A. A., Pentina, I., Mishra, A. S., & Ben Mimoun, M. S. (2020). Exploring factors influencing US millennial consumers’ use of tap-and-go payment technology. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 30(2), 143–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekkers, R., & Wiepking, P. (2011). A literature review of empirical studies of philanthropy: Eight mechanisms that drive charitable giving. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(5), 924–973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, R. (2006). Predicting the lifetime durations of donors to charities. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 15(1–2), 45–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, R. (2009). Impulsive donation decisions during online browsing of charity websites. Journal of Consumer Behaviour: An International Research Review, 8(2–3), 116–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, R. (2013). Elements, causes and effects of donor engagement among supporters of UK charities. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 10(3), 201–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, R. (2018). Financial charity giving behaviour of the working poor: An empirical investigation. Journal of Marketing Management, 34(17–18), 1587–1607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, R., & Savani, S. (2004). Factors influencing the willingness to donate body parts for transplantation. Journal of Health & Social Policy, 18(3), 61–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloemer, J., & Odekerken-Schröder, G. (2003). Antecedents and consequences of affective commitment. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 11(3), 33–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, E., Peterson, M., & Gregory, G. (2010). Toward a better understanding of volunteering for nonprofit organizations: Explaining volunteers’ pro-social attitudes. Journal of Macromarketing, 30(1), 61–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao, Q., & Niu, X. (2019). Integrating context-awareness and UTAUT to explain Alipay user adoption. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 69, 9–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, A., & Fernandes, T. (2018). Understanding customer brand engagement with virtual social communities: A comprehensive model of drivers, outcomes and moderators. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 26(1–2), 23–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chemingui, H., & Ben Lallouna, H. (2013). Resistance, motivations, trust and intention to use mobile financial services. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 31(7), 574–592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. R. R. (2018). Strategic donor engagement on mobile social networking sites for mobile donations: A study of millennial WeChat users in China. Chinese Journal of Communication, 11(1), 26–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W., & Givens, T. (2013). Mobile donation in America. Mobile Media & Communication, 1(2), 196–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, M., Lemon, L. L., Levenshus, A. B., & Childers, C. C. (2019). Current students as university donors?: Determinants in college students’ intentions to donate and share information about university crowdfunding efforts. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 16(1), 23–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, B., & Kim, M. (2016). Donation via Mobile applications: A study of the factors affecting Mobile donation application use. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 32(12), 967–974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, S., Kim, H., Chung, M., & Lee, S. Y. (2019). Online donation experiences, donation awareness, and intention of future donation among teenagers in South Korea. Journal of Social Service Research, 45(5), 622–633.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwivedi, A. (2015). A higher-order model of consumer brand engagement and its impact on loyalty intentions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 24, 100–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erciş, A., Ünal, S., Candan, F. B., & Yıldırım, H. (2012). The effect of brand satisfaction, trust and brand commitment on loyalty and repurchase intentions. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 58, 1395–1404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang, Y. H. (2017). Beyond the usefulness of branded applications: Insights from consumer–brand engagement and self-construal perspectives. Psychology & Marketing, 34(1), 40–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finney, J. M. (1978). A theory of religious commitment. Sociological Analysis, 39(1), 19–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • France, C., Merrilees, B., & Miller, D. (2016). An integrated model of customer-brand engagement: Drivers and consequences. Journal of Brand Management, 23(2), 119–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullerton, G. (2005). How commitment both enables and undermines marketing relationships. European Journal of Marketing, 39(11–12), 1372–1388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair Jr., J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage publications.

  • Hassay, D. N., & Peloza, J. (2009). Building the charity brand community. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 21(1), 24–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, C. D., Shanahan, K. J., & Raymond, M. A. (2014). The moderating role of religiosity on nonprofit advertising. Journal of Business Research, 67(2), 23–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, J. (2008). The branding of charities. In A. Sargeant & W. Wymer (Eds.), The Routledge companion to nonprofit marketing (pp. 70–81). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Human, D., & Terblanche, N. S. (2012). Who receives what? The influence of the donation magnitude and donation recipient in cause-related marketing. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 24(2), 141–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, W., Ouschan, R., Burton, H., Soutar, G., & O’Brien, I. (2017). Customer engagement in CSR: A utility theory model with moderating variables. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 27(4), 833–853.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeng, S. P. (2016). The influences of airline brand credibility on consumer purchase intentions. Journal of Air Transport Management, 55, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C. M., & Tariq, A. (2016). Need for status as a motive for the conspicuous consumption of cause-related goods. In K. Kim (Ed.), Celebrating America’s pastimes: Baseball, hot dogs, apple pie and marketing?. Developments in marketing science: Proceedings of the academy of marketing science (pp. 19–23). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, P. J., & Troth, A. C. (2020). Common method bias in applied settings: The dilemma of researching in organizations. Australian Journal of Management, 45(1), 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, I., Rahman, Z., & Fatma, M. (2016). The role of customer brand engagement and brand experience in online banking. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 34(7), 1025–1041. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-07-2015-0110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinschafer, J., Morrison, M., & Dowell, D. (2018). The importance of the service encounter in influencing identity salience and volunteering behavior in the cultural sector. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 15(4), 455–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration (ijec), 11(4), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kull, A. J., & Heath, T. B. (2016). You decide, we donate: Strengthening consumer–brand relationships through digitally co-created social responsibility. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 33(1), 78–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, J., & Nayak, J. (2019). Consumer psychological motivations to customer brand engagement: A case of brand community. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 36(1), 168–177. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-01-2018-2519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwak, D. H. A., Ramamurthy, K. R., Nazareth, D., & Lee, S. (2018). The moderating role of helper’s high in anchoring process: An empirical investigation in the context of charity website design. Computers in Human Behavior, 84, 230–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Q. (2017). Research on impact factors for online donation behavior of bank customer. The Journal of Finance and Data Science, 3(1–4), 13–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y. Z., He, T. L., Song, Y. R., Yang, Z., & Zhou, R. T. (2018). Factors impacting donors’ intention to donate to charitable crowd-funding projects in China: A UTAUT-based model. Information, Communication & Society, 21(3), 404–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindell, M. K., & Whitney, D. J. (2001). Accounting for common method variance in crosssectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 114–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, L., Suh, A., & Wagner, C. (2018). Empathy or perceived credibility? An empirical study on individual donation behavior in charitable crowdfunding. Internet Research, 28(3), 623–651. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-06-2017-0240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, Y., Yang, S., Chau, P. Y., & Cao, Y. (2011). Dynamics between the trust transfer process and intention to use mobile payment services: A cross-environment perspective. Information & Management, 48(8), 393–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lwin, M., Phau, I., & Lim, A. (2014). An investigation of the characteristics of australian charitable donors. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 26(4), 372–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijer, M. M. (2009). The effects of charity reputation on charitable giving. Corporate Reputation Review, 12(1), 33–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meng, R., Kang, M., Wang, T., & Zheng, H. (2016). Understanding the role of Commitmentsin explaining Crowdfunding investing willingness: Antecedents and consequences. In In proceedings of the 20th Pacific Asia conference on information systems. Chiayi: Taiwan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, A., Ford, J. B., & Rose, G. (2011). How personal nostalgia influences giving to charity. Journal of Business Research, 64(6), 610–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaelidou, N., Micevski, M., & Siamagka, N. (2015). Consumers’ intention to donate to two children’s charity brands: A comparison of Barnardo’s and BBC children in need. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 24(2), 134–146. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-04-2014-0573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michel, G., & Rieunier, S. (2012). Nonprofit brand image and typicality influences on charitable giving. Journal of Business Research, 65(5), 701–707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miltgen, C. L., Popovič, A., & Oliveira, T. (2013). Determinants of end-user acceptance of biometrics: Integrating the “big 3” of technology acceptance with privacy context. Decision Support Systems, 56, 103–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, S. L., & Clark, M. (2019). Reconceptualising product life-cycle theory as stakeholder engagement with non-profit organisations. Journal of Marketing Management, 35(1–2), 13–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moriuchi, E., & Chung, C. (2018). Young Americans’ ethnic identity toward disaster advertising: The effects of disaster location and message types. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 23(1), e1596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muralidharan, S., & La Ferle, C. (2018). Religious symbolism in the digital realm: A social advertising approach to motivate bystanders to aid victims of cyberbullying. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 42(6), 804–812.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noor, A. H. B. M., Isa, N. A. M., Irpan, H. M., Bahrom, H. B., Salleh, A. B. M., & Ridzuan, A. R. B. (2015). Characteristic affecting charitable donations behavior: Empirical evidence from Malaysia. Procedia Economics and Finance, 31, 563–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira, T., Thomas, M., Baptista, G., & Campos, F. (2016). Mobile payment: Understanding the determinants of customer adoption and intention to recommend the technology. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 404–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osei-Frimpong, K., & McLean, G. (2018). Examining online social brand engagement: A social presence theory perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 128, 10–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajan, S. S., Pink, G. H., & Dow, W. H. (2009). Sociodemographic and personality characteristics of Canadian donors contributing to international charity. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38(3), 413–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randle, M., Leisch, F., & Dolnicar, S. (2013). Competition or collaboration? The effect of non-profit brand image on volunteer recruitment strategy. Journal of Brand Management, 20(8), 689–704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rather, R., Tehseen, S., & Parrey, S. (2018). Promoting customer brand engagement and brand loyalty through customer brand identification and value congruity. Spanish Journal of Marketing - ESIC, 22(3), 319–337. https://doi.org/10.1108/SJME-06-2018-0030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). Gain more insight from your PLS-SEM results: The importance-performance map analysis. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(9), 1865–1886.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizal, H., & Amin, H. (2017). Perceived ihsan, Islamic egalitarianism and Islamic religiosity towards charitable giving of cash waqf. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 8(4), 669–685.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J. A., & David, M. E. (2019). Holier than thou: Investigating the relationship between religiosity and charitable giving. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 24(1), e1619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Ricardo, Y., Sicilia, M., & López, M. (2018). What drives crowdfunding participation? The influence of personal and social traits. Spanish Journal of Marketing - ESIC, 22(2), 163–182. https://doi.org/10.1108/SJME-03-2018-004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudd, M., Aaker, J., & Norton, M. I. (2014). Getting the most out of giving: Concretely framing a prosocial goal maximizes happiness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 54, 11–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sargeant, A., Ford, J. B., & Hudson, J. (2008). Charity brand personality: The relationship with giving behavior. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 37(3), 468–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sargeant, A., Ford, J. B., & West, D. C. (2006). Perceptual determinants of nonprofit giving behavior. Journal of Business Research, 59(2), 155–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxton, J. (1995). A strong charity brand comes from strong beliefs and values. Journal of Brand Management, 2(4), 211–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S. K., Sharma, H., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2019). A hybrid SEM-neural network model for predicting determinants of mobile payment services. Information Systems Management, 36(3), 243–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sivathanu, B. (2019). Adoption of digital payment systems in the era of demonetization in India: An empirical study. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 10(1), 143–171. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-07-2017-0033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smitko, K. (2012). Donor engagement through twitter. Public Relations Review, 38(4), 633–635.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skarmeas, D., & Shabbir, H. A. (2011). Relationship quality and giving behaviour in the UK fundraising sector; exploring the antecedent roles of religiosity and self-construal. European Journal of Marketing, 45(5), 720–738.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stathopoulou, A., Borel, L., Christodoulides, G., & West, D. (2017). Consumer branded# hashtag engagement: Can creativity in TV advertising influence hashtag engagement? Psychology & Marketing, 34(4), 448–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, E., & Hartman, R. L. (2013). Charity brand personality: Can smaller charitable organizations leverage their brand’s personality to influence giving. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 18(3), 203–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streukens, S., Leroi-Werelds, S., & Willems, K. (2017). Dealing with nonlinearity in importance-performance map analysis (IPMA): An integrative framework in a PLS-SEM context. In H. Latan & R. Noonan (Eds.), Partial least squares path modeling: Basic concepts, methodological issues, and applications (pp. 367–403). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sura, S., Ahn, J., & Lee, O. (2017). Factors influencing intention to donate via social network site (SNS): From Asian’s perspective. Telematics and Informatics, 34(1), 164–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terry, D. J., Hogg, M. A., & White, K. M. (1999). The theory of planned behaviour: Self-identity, social identity and group norms. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38(3), 225–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiltay, M. A., & Torlak, Ö. (2020). Similarities and differences of motivations of giving time and money: Giving to individuals versus humanitarian organizations in an emerging marke. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 25(1), e1649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urbonavicius, S., Adomaviciute, K., Urbutyte, I., & Cherian, J. (2019). Donation to charity and purchase of cause-related products: The influence of existential guilt and experience. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 18(2), 89–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, C. J. (2016). Toward a tweet typology: Contributory consumer engagement with brand messages by content type. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 16(2), 157–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, T. (1899). The theory of the leisure class. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veludo-de-Oliveira, T. M., Alhaidari, I. S., Yani-de-Soriano, M., & Yousafzai, S. Y. (2017). Comparing the explanatory and predictive power of intention-based theories of personal monetary donation to charitable organizations. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 28(2), 571–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venable, B. T., Rose, G. M., Bush, V. D., & Gilbert, F. W. (2005). The role of brand personality in charitable giving: An assessment and validation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33(3), 295–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verkijika, S. F. (2020). An affective response model for understanding the acceptance of mobile payment systems. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 39, 100905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2019.100905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vivek, S. D., Beatty, S. E., & Morgan, R. M. (2012). Customer engagement: Exploring customer relationships beyond purchase. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 20(2), 122–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, D. J., Green, C. L., & Brashear, T. G. (2000). Development and validation of scales to measure attitudes influencing monetary donations to charitable organizations. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2), 299–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wymer, W., & Akbar, M. M. (2017). Brand authenticity, its conceptualization, and its relevance to nonprofit marketing. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 14(3), 359–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wymer, W., & Akbar, M. M. (2019). Brand authenticity’s influence on charity support intentions. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 31(5), 507–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wymer, W., Gross, H. P., & Helmig, B. (2016). Nonprofit brand strength: What is it? How is it measured? What are its outcomes? Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 27(3), 1448–1471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(2), 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, T. (2014). An empirical examination of initial trust in mobile payment. Wireless Personal Communications, 77(2), 1519–1531.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Economic, Management & Administrative sciences, Semnan University, Semnan, Zip Code: 35131-19111, Iran

    Fatemeh Maleki

  2. Faculty of management and accounting, University of Allameh Taba Taba e (ATU), Tehran, Iran

    Seyed Mohsen Hosseini

Authors
  1. Fatemeh Maleki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Seyed Mohsen Hosseini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fatemeh Maleki.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maleki, F., Hosseini, S.M. Charity donation intention via m-payment apps: donor-related, m-payment system-related, or charity brand-related factors, which one is overkill?. Int Rev Public Nonprofit Mark 17, 409–443 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-020-00254-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-020-00254-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation