Abstract
Academic literature about the idea of social innovation grew sharply over the last decade, with researchers trying to define its concept and presenting several examples of successful social innovations. However, to support the development of social innovation initiatives is important to have a conceptual framework that allows evaluating its true impact. The purpose of this paper is to identify the boundary conditions for an effective set of social innovation indicators, which will help to have a more informed decision-making process. The main conclusion is that the impact of social innovations can be conceived as a set of results that manifests itself through different time periods, at different spatial scales, and must take into account the value experienced by all stakeholders involved. Thus, since a positive social innovation outcome depends on diverse factors and conditions, being most often context-dependent, it means that rather than imposing a specific set of indicators, based on a ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach a measuring process procedure should be adopted to assess the impact of social innovations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Antadze, N., & Westley, F. (2012). Impact metrics for social innovation: Barriers or bridges to radical change? Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 3(2), 133–150.
Baturina, D., & Bežovan, G. (2015). Social innovation impact-review no. 9. In Seventh Framework Programme (grant agreement 613034), European Union. Brussels: Third Sector Impact.
Benneworth, P. (2013). The evaluation of universities and their contributions to social exclusion. In P. Benneworth (Ed.), University engagement with socially excluded communities. Dordrecht: Springer.
Benneworth, P., & Cunha, J. (2015). Universities’ contributions to social innovation: Reflections in theory & practice. European Journal of Innovation Management, 18(4), 508–527.
Benneworth, P., & Jongbloed, B. (2010). Who matters to universities? A stakeholder perspective on humanities, arts and social sciences valorisation. Higher Education, 59, 567–588.
Benneworth, P., & Pinheiro, R. (2017). Regional upgrading in the periphery: A view from the "rich" northern European cousins. In M. Fonseca & U. Fratesi (Eds.), Regional upgrading in southern Europe: Spatial dimensions and human capital. Dordrecht: Springer Verlag.
Benneworth, P. S., Pinheiro, R., & Karlsen, J. (2017). Strategic agency and institutional change: Investigating the role of universities in regional innovation systems (RISs). Regional Studies, 51(2), 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1215599.
BEPA-Bureau of European Policy Advisers. (2010). Empowering people, driving change: Social innovation in the European Union. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
BEPA-Bureau of European Policy Advisers. (2014). Social innovation: A decade of changes. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Böhme, K., & Gløersen, E. (2011). Territorial cohesion storylines: Understanding a policy concept. Spatial Foresight Brief, 2011, 1.
Bund, E., Gerhard, U., Hoelscher, M., & Mildenberger, G. (2015). A methodological framework for measuring social innovation. In: Historical Social Research, 40(3), 48–78.
Cabinet Office, Social Investment and Finance Team. (2013, May). Achieving social impact at scale: Case studies of seven pioneering co-mingling social investment funds. London: U.K.
Choi, N.; Majumdar, S. (2015) “Social innovation: Towards a conceptualisation”, in S. Majumdar et al. (eds.), technology and innovation for social change, springer India.
Cunha, J., & Benneworth, P. (2013). Universities’ contributions to social innovation: Towards a theoretical framework, paper presented at the EURA conference 2013, 3–6 July. The Netherlands: Enschede.
Cunha, J.; Benneworth, P.; Oliveira, P. (2015) “Social entrepreneurship and social innovation: A conceptual distinction”, in handbook of research on global competitive advantage through innovation and entrepreneurship, edited by L. Farinha, J. Ferreira, H. Lawton-smith, and S. Bagchi-Sen, Publisher: IGI global. Hershey, Pennsylvania.
Cunha, J.; Mensing, R.; Benneworth, P. (2019) A conceptual framework to understand student volunteerism, Tertiary Education and Management, 25:31–44.
Dainiene, R., & Dagiliene, L. (2015). A TBL approach based theoretical framework for measuring social innovations. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 213, 275–280.
Esteves, A., Franks, D., & Vanclay, F. (2012). Social impact assessment: The state of the art. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 30(1), 34–42.
European Commission/OECD. (2015). Policy brief on social impact measurement for social enterprises. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Howaldt, J., Domanski, D., & Kaletka, C. (2016). Social innovation: Towards a new innovation paradigm. Mackenzie Management Review, 17(6), 20–44.
Joy, M., & Shields, J. (2013). Social impact bonds: The next phase of third sector marketization? Canadian journal of nonprofit and social economy research, 4(2), 39–55.
Juliani, D., Silva, A., Cunha, J., & Benneworth, P. (2017). Universities’ contributions to sustainable development’s social challenge: A case study of a social innovation practice. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, 8(3), 1–18.
Korez-Vide R, Tominc, P. (2016). Competitiveness, entrepreneurship and economic growth. In P. Trapczynski et al. (eds.), competitiveness of CEE economies and businesses, springer international publishing Switzerland 2016.
Krlev, G., Bund, E., & Mildenberger, G. (2014). Measuring what matters—Indicators of social innovativeness on the National Level. Information Systems Management, 31(3), 200–224.
Millar, R., & Hall, K. (2013). Social return on Investment (SROI) and performance measurement. Public Management Review, 15(6), 923–941.
OECD (2007). Innovation and growth: Rationale for an innovation strategy.
Nicholls, A. (2015) “Synthetic grid: A critical framework to inform the development of social innovation metrics”, CRESSI working papers no. 14/2015.
Nicholls, A., & Dees, J. G. (2015). Social Innovation. In D. James (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (second edition) (pp. 355–361). Elsevier, Oxford: Wright.
Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., Fini, R., Geuna, A., Grimaldi, R., Hughes, A., & Krabel, S. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423–442.
Phills, J., Deiglmeier, K., & Miller, D. (2008). Rediscovering social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 6(Fall).
Preskill, H.; Beer, T. (2012) “Evaluating social innovation”, Center for Evaluation Innovation.
Reeder, et al. (2012). Strengthening social innovation in Europe - journey to effective assess ment and metrics. European Commision: Directorate-General for Enterprise and Industry.
Rodrigues, A. (2007). Modelos de gestão e inovação social em organizações sem fins lucrativos: Divergências e convergências entre nonprofit sector e economia social. Organizações & Sociedade, 14(43), 111–128.
Singh, A., & Majumdar, S. (2015). Technology and innovation for creating social change: Concepts and theories. In S. Majumdar, S. Guha, & N. Marakkath (Eds.), Technology and innovation for social change. New Delhi: Springer.
Universiteit Twente (2016) Vision2020: vernieuwen, experimenteren, pionieren, Enschede, University of Twente (mimeo).
Acknowledgements
This paper reports findings produced within the ESRC-funded project “Bringing Cambridge to Consett: university spin-off companies in the periphery” (RES-000-22-0659) along with a Research Councils UK Academic Fellowship in Territorial Governance. This paper also draws on work supported by the European Commission’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Marie Skłodowska-Curie action grant agreement No. 722295, the RUNIN Project. This work was also financed by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology, under Project PTDC/EGE-OGE/31635/2017.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cunha, J., Benneworth, P. How to measure the impact of social innovation initiatives?. Int Rev Public Nonprofit Mark 17, 59–75 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-019-00240-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-019-00240-4