Abstract
This study tests the impact of celebrity endorsement in cause- related marketing (CrM) campaigns, specifically in the non-profit firms in Egypt. This study is based on examining the impact of the five main elements of celebrity endorsement: celebrity attractiveness, celebrity expertise, celebrity trustworthiness, celebrity familiarity and celebrity-cause fit on audience’s attitudes and their behavioral intentions to donate to the firms’ causes. This study relied on quantitative approach, which involves distributing, collecting, and analyzing a large-scale questionnaire survey. Questionnaires were electronically distributed. Data were collected from 390 respondents based on convenience sampling technique and were analyzed using Structural Equation Modelling (SEM), AMOS 22. The findings showed that celebrity attractiveness has the most significant positive direct impact on audience’s attitudes towards CrM campaigns. Moreover, celebrity-cause fit and celebrity trustworthiness have an acceptable level of significant positive direct impact on audience’s attitudes towards CrM campaigns. However, celebrity expertise and celebrity familiarity do not have a significant impact on audience’s attitudes towards CrM campaigns. Findings further indicated that audience’s attitudes have a significant positive direct impact on their behavioral intentions to donate to the firms’ causes. This study contributes on the theoretical level in many ways: by adding to the area of celebrity endorsement in CrM campaigns, particularly in non-profit firms, the field in which there is a lack of research; by combining several social causes that use different types of celebrities in one study; by developing a conceptual framework that links between five main elements of celebrity endorsement, audience’s attitudes and their behavioral intentions to donate to the firms’ causes in Egypt, which recently has witnessed a growing trend of endorsing celebrities in numerous charitable firms. It also provides crucial directions to the marketing specialists about the required elements for an effective use of celebrity endorsement in CrM campaigns, which helps in building positive audience’s attitudes. This may lead to positive behavioral intentions to donate to the firms’ causes.
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
18 December 2019
Unfortunately in Volume 16, the Issue 2���4 had been published online with an incorrect date (2001 instead of 2019).
References
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. OrganizationalBehavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Alley, T., & Hildebrandt, K. (1988). Determinants and consequences of facial aesthetics. In T. R. Alley (Ed.), Social and applied aspect of perceiving faces (pp. 101–140). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Amos, C., Holmes, G., & Strutton, D. (2008). Exploring the relationship between celebrity endorser effects and advertising effectiveness. International Journal of Advertising, 27(2), 209–234.
Bafna, et al. (2016). Influence of celebrity endorsements on the consumer behavior for facial care product. Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 2(5), 2454–1362 http://www.onlinejournal.in.
Behnoosh, S., Naylor, M., & Dickson, G. (2018). The impact of endorsement on a sport-based social marketing campaign. International Journal of Sport Management and Marketing, 18(6), 478–500.
Belch, J. E., & Belch, M. A. (2018). Advertising and promotion: An integrated marketing communications perspective (11th ed.). NY, USA: McGraw-Hill Education.
Bergkvist, L., Hjalmarson, H., & Mägi, A. W. (2016). A new model of how celebrity endorsements work: Attitude toward the endorsement as a mediator of celebrity source and endorsement effects. International Journal of Advertising, 35(2), 171–184.
Bornstein, R.F. (1989). Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968-1987, Psychological Bulletin, 106, 265-289.
Brooks, A. C., & Wilson, J. Q. (2007). Who really cares: The surprising truth about compassionate conservatism–America’s charity divide–who gives, who doesn’t, and why it matters. New York: Basic Books.
Brunel, F., & Nelson, M. (2003). Message order effects and gender differences in advertising persuasion. Journal of Advertising Research, 43, 330–341.
Bulck, H. (2012). Celebrities’ quest for a better world: Understanding Flemish Public Perceptions Of Koen Panis Celebrities. Societal Engagement, 19(3), 75–92.
Diana, S., & Bryan, A. L. (2007). The equity effect of product endorsement by celebrities: A conceptual framework from a co-branding perspective. European Journal of Marketing, 41(1/2), 121–134.
Edmondson, D.R., & Lafferty, B.A. (2007). Cause Related Marketing: A Model of Consumer’s Attitude toward the Cause-Brand Alliance. Distinguished Teaching Competition-Sponsored by Sherwin-Williams, 67, 20.
Edmondson, D. R., & Lafferty, B. A. (2014). A model of relevant antecedents and outcome variables for cause-related marketing. Journal of Management & Marketing Research, 14, 1–13.
Eisend, M., & Langner, T. (2010). Immediate and delayed advertising effects of celebrity endorsers’ attractiveness and expertise. International Journal of Advertising, 29(4), 527–546.
Elshahed, H. (2019). NGO and media appeals usage in Egypt: Ramadan as a case study. Global Media Journal, 17(32), 173), 1–173), 7.
Erdogan, B. Z. (1999). Celebrity endorsement: A literature review. Journal of Marketing Management, 15(4), 291–314.
Goldsmith, R. E., Lafferty, B. A., & Newell, S. J. (2000). The impact of corporate credibility and celebrity credibility on consumer reaction to advertisements and brands. Journal of Advertising, 29(3), 43–54.
Govers, P. C., & Mugge, R. (2004). I love my jeep, because it’s tough like me’: The effect of product- personality congruence on product attachment. In Proceedings of the fourth international conference on design and emotion. Ankara, Turkey.
Gresham, L. G., & Shimp, T. A. (1985). Attitude toward The Advertisement and Brand Attitudes: A Classical Conditioning Perspective. Journal of Advertising, 14(1), 10-18.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). New Jersey. In Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Prentice Hall.
Hajjat, M. M. (2003). Effect of cause-related marketing on attitudes and purchase intentions: the moderating role of cause involvement and donation size. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 11(1), 93– 109.
Hatfield, E., & Sprecher, S. (1986). Mirror, mirror: The importance of looks in everyday life. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Hou, J., Du, L., & Li, J. (2008). Cause’s attributes influencing consumer’s purchasing intention: Empirical evidence from China. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 20(4), 363–380.
Hovland, C. I., & Weiss, W. (1953). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15, 635–650.
Ilicic, J., & Baxter, S. (2014). Fit in celebrity–charity alliances: When perceived celanthropy benefits nonprofit organisations. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 19(3), 200–208.
Kahle, L. R., & Homer, P. M. (1985). Physical attractiveness of the celebrity endorser: A social adaptation perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(4), 954–961.
Kamins, M. A. (1990). An investigation into the Bmatch-up hypothesis in celebrity advertising: When beauty may be only skin deep. Journal of Advertising, 19(1), 4–13.
Keller, K. L., & Aaker, D. A. (1992). The effects of sequential introduction of brand extensions. Journal of Marketing Research, 29(1), 35–50.
Kim, Y.-J., & Na, J.-H. (2007). Effects of celebrity athlete endorsement on attitude towards the product: The role of credibility, attractiveness and the concept of congruence. International Journal of Sports Marketing & Sponsorship, 8(4), 23–33.
Knoll, J., & Matthes, J. (2016). The effectiveness of celebrity endorsements: A meta-analysis. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45(1), 55–75.
Kropp, F., Holden, S. J. S., & Lavack, A. M. (1999). Cause-related marketing and values in Australia. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 4(1), 69–80.
Lafferty, B. A., & Edmondson, D. R. (2014). A note on the role of cause type in cause-related marketing. Journal of Business Research, 67(7), 1455–1460.
Lafferty, B. A., Goldsmith, R. E., & Newell, S. J. (2002). The dual credibility model: The influence of corporate and endorser credibility on attitudes and purchase intentions. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 10(3), 1–11.
Leiprecht, H. (2013). Giving a face to the good cause: The effects of celebrity endorsed cause-related marketing. University of Amsterdam.
Luo, L., Chen, X. J., Han, J., & Park, C. W. (2010). Dilution and enhancement of ce- lebrity brands through sequential movie releases. Journal of Marketing Research, 47, 1114–11128.
Myers, B., Kwon, W.-S., & Forsythe, S. (2012). Creating effective cause-related marketing campaigns: the role of cause-brand fit, campaign news source, and perceived motivations. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 30(3), 167-182.
Myrick, J. G., & Evans, S. D. (2014). Do PSAs take a bite out of sharkweek? The effects of juxtaposing environmental messages with violentimages of shark attacks. Science Communication, 36(5), 544–569.
Nunnelley, W.S. (2012). Cause related marketing: Understanding celebrity, consumer, and product fit relationships. dissertation, Auburn University.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). NewYork: McGraw-Hill.
Ohanian, R. (1990). Construction and validation of a scale to measure celebrity endorsers’ perceived expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness. Journal of Advertising, 19(3), 39–52.
Ohanian, R. (1991). The impact of celebrity spokespersons’ perceived image on consumers’ intention to purchase. Journal of Advertising Research, 4(1), 46–54.
Park, S.-Y., & Cho, M. (2015). Celebrity endorsement for nonprofit organizations: The role of celebrity motive attribution and spontaneous judgment of celebrity-cause incongruence. Journal of Promotion Management, 21(2), 224–245.
Phelps, J. E., & Hoy, M. G. (1996). The Aad-ab-PI relationship in children: The impact of brand familiarity and measurement timing. Psychology and Marketing, 13(1), 77–101.
Proença, J. F., & Pereira, I. V. (2008). Exploring the consumption of charity-linked products. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 5(1), 53–69.
Rossiter, J. R., & Smidts, A. (2012). Print advertising: Celebrity presenters. Journal of Business Research, 65, 874–879.
Roy, S. (2006). An exploratory study in celebrity endorsements. Journal of creative communications, 1(2), 139–153.
Roy, S. (2016). Meaning transfer in celebrity endorsements: An explanation using metaphors. Journal of Marketing Communications, 24(8), 1–20.
Salmones, M., Dominguez, R., & Herrero, A. (2015). Communication using celebrities in the non-profit sector. International Journal of Advertising, 32(1), 101–119.
Samu, S., & Wymer, W. (2009). The effect of fit and dominance in cause marketing communications. Journal of Business Research, 62(4), 432–440.
Seno, D., & Lukas, B. A. (2007). The equity effect of product endorsement by celebrities: A conceptual framework from a co-branding perspective. European Journal of Marketing, 41, 121–134.
Sharma, N. & Patterson, P. (1999). The impact of communication effectiveness and service quality on relationship commitment in consumer, professional services. The Journal of Services Marketing, 13 (2), 151-170.
Shimp, T. (1981). Attitude toward the ad as a mediator of consumer brand choice. Journal of Advertising, 10(2), 9–18.
Silvera, D. H., & Austad, B. (2004). Factors predicting the effectiveness of celebrity endorsement advertisements. European Journal of Marketing, 38(11/12), 1509–1526.
Solomon, M. R. (2018). Consumer behavior: Buying, having and being (12th ed. Essex, UK: Pearson Education Limited.
Spry, A., Pappu, R., & Cornwell, T. B. (2011). Celebrity endorsement, brand credibility and brand equity. European Journal of Marketing, 45(6), 882–909.
Thamaraiselvan, N., Senthil, B., & Inbaraj, J. (2017). Role of celebrity in cause related marketing. International Review Public Nonprofit Mark, 14, 341–357.
Till, B., & Busler, M. (1998). Matching products with endorsers: Attractiveness versus expertise. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 15(6), 576–584.
Till, B., & Busler, M. (2000). The match-up hypothesis: Physical attractiveness, expertise, and the role of fit on brand attitude, purchase intent and brand beliefs. Journal of Advertising, 29(3), 1–13.
Trimble, C.S. & Rifon, N.J. (2006). Consumer perceptions of Compatability in cause-related marketing messages,” International Journal of Non-Profit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 11, 29–47, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Venable, B., Rose, G., Bush, V., & Gilbert, F. (2005). The role of brand personality in charitable giving: An assessment and validation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33, 295–312.
Wheeler, R. T. (2002). The connected celebrity and nonprofit advertising (doctoral dissertation). Cleveland, OH: Case Western Reserve University.
Wymer, W. & Drollinger, T. (2015). Charity Appeals Using Celebrity Endorsers: Celebrity Attributes Most Predictive of Audience Donation Intentions. International society for third sector research, 26, 2694–2717.
Youn, S., & Kim, H. (2008). Antecedents of consumer attitudes toward cause-related marketing. Journal of Advertising Research, 48(1), 123–137.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
1.1 Celebrity Attractiveness
-
The celebrity endorser is attractive.
-
The celebrity endorser is classy.
-
The celebrity endorser is elegant.
-
The celebrity endorser is presentable.
1.2 Celebrity Expertise
-
The celebrity endorser is experienced.
-
The celebrity endorser is knowledgeable.
-
The celebrity endorser is qualified.
-
The celebrity endorser is expert.
1.3 Celebrity Trustworthiness
-
The celebrity endorser is honest.
-
The celebrity endorser is reliable.
-
The celebrity endorser is trustworthy.
-
The celebrity endorser is dependable.
-
The celebrity endorser is sincere.
1.4 Celebrity Familiarity
-
When I reviewed this CrM campaign, I knew who the endorser was.
-
When I reviewed this CrM campaign, I recognized the endorser.
-
When I reviewed this CrM campaign, I was familiar with the endorser.
-
When I reviewed this CrM campaign, I considered the endorser to be well-known.
-
When I reviewed this CrM campaign, I did not recognize the endorser*
-
When I reviewed this CrM campaign, I was aware of who the endorser was.
-
When I reviewed this CrM campaign, I was able to identify the endorser.
1.5 Celebrity- cause fit
-
It is very logical for the celebrity to endorse this CrM campaign.
-
This celebrity is very appropriate to endorse this CrM campaign.
-
This CrM campaign matched with the celebrity personality.
-
The celebrity and the CrM campaign represent each other well.
-
The celebrity and the CrM campaign fit together well.
1.6 Attitude towards CrM campaign
-
I like to donate to the charitable organization mentioned in this CrM campaign.
-
Individuals are more likely to recommend charitable organizations that use celebrities in their CrM campaign.
-
Celebrity endorsers in the CrM campaign make a charitable organization more memorable.
-
Individuals are more likely to donate to organizations that use a celebrity endorser in their CrM campaign.
1.7 Behavioral intention
-
I am likely to participate in this charitable organization by donating.
-
I am keen to learn more about this charitable organization.
-
I would be willing to influence others to donate to this charitable organization.
-
I would be willing to donate to this charitable organization.
-
I would consider donating this charitable organization in order to help it.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tantawi, P., Sadek, H. The impact of celebrity endorsement in cause related marketing campaigns on audiences’ behavioral intentions: Egypt case. Int Rev Public Nonprofit Mark 16, 293–311 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-019-00231-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-019-00231-5