Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Why Canadians give to charity: an extended theory of planned behaviour model

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to test an expanded model of charitable giving and the intention to donate based on the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). The novelty of this research resides in disaggregating the overall attitude a donor may hold into three different attitude constructs: attitude toward a charity, attitude toward helping, and attitude toward donation. An online survey was conducted of 202 potential Canadian charitable donors. By using a hierarchical multiple regression, results show that overall, the extended TPB model proposed in this study is significantly better than those found in the extant research in predicting the intention to donate. The strongest influences on the intention to donate were past behaviour, moral norms, and perceived behavioural control. Subjective norms and attitude toward charitable organisation were found to be non-significant predictors. Managerial implications are also presented at the end of the paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1985). From intention to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Bechmand (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behavior. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). Theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (2001). Nature and operation of attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 27–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (1999). Distinguishing perceptions of control from self-efficacy: predicting consumption of a low-fat diet using the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(1), 72–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Burnkrant, R. E. (1979). Attitude measurement and behavior change: a reconsideration of attitude organization and its relationship to behavior. NA - Advances in Consumer Research, 6, 295–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., Lee, K. H., & Van Loo, M. F. (2001). Decisions to donate bone marrow: The role of attitudes and subjective norms across cultures. Psychology and Health, 16(1), 29–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartolini, W. F. (2005). Prospective donors’ cognitive and emotive processing of charitable gift requests (Doctoral dissertation, Kent State University).

  • Beck, L., & Ajzen, I. (1991). Predicting dishonest actions using the theory of planned behaviour. Journal of Research in Personality, 25, 285–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, E., Peterson, M., & Gregory, G. (2010). Toward a better understanding of volunteering for nonprofit organizations: explaining volunteers’ pro-social attitudes. Journal of Macromarketing, 30(1), 61–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conner, M., & Armitage, C. J. (1998). Extending the theory of planned behavior: a review and avenues for further research. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 1429–1464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conner, M., Warren, R., Close, S., & Sparks, P. (1999). Alcohol consumption and the theory of planned behavior: an examination of the cognitive mediation of past behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(8), 1676–1704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conner, M., Norman, P., & Bell, R. (2002). The theory of planned behavior and healthy eating. Health Psychology, 21(2), 194–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drollinger, T. (2010). A theoretical examination of giving and volunteering utilizing resource exchange theory. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 22(1), 55–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giles, M., & Cairns, E. (1995). Blood donation and Ajzen's theory of planned behaviour: an examination of perceived behavioural control. British Journal of Social Psychology, 34(2), 173–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, M. K., & White, K. M. (2009). To be a donor or not to be? Applying an extended theory of planned behavior to predict posthumous organ donation intentions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39, 880–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, L., & Lindh, C. (2018). The sustainability-age dilemma: a theory of (un) planned behaviour via influencers. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 17(1), e127–e139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kashif, M., & De Run, E. C. (2015). Money donations intentions among Muslim donors: an extended theory of planned behavior model. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 20(1), 84–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kashif, M., Sarifuddin, S., & Hassan, A. (2015). Charity donation: intentions and behaviour. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 33(1), 90–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, S. R., Hyde, M. K., & White, K. M. (2012). Predictors of Young People's Charitable Intentions to Donate Money: An Extended Theory of Planned Behavior Perspective. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(9), 2096–2110.

  • Koschate-Fischer, N., Stefan, I. V., & Hoyer, W. D. (2012). Willingness to pay for cause-related marketing: the impact of donation amount and moderating effects. Journal of Marketing Research, 49(6), 910–927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, S. B. (2003). The dangers of poor construct conceptualization. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31(3), 323–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mannetti, L., Pierro, A., & Livi, S. (2004). Recycling: planned and self-expressive behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(2), 227–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manstead, A. S. R. (2000). The role of moral norm in the attitude–behavior relation. In D. J. Terry & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Attitudes, behavior, and social context (pp. 11–30). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsumoto, D., Yoo, S. H., & Fontaine, J. (2008). Mapping expressive differences around the world the relationship between emotional display rules and individualism versus collectivism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39(1), 55–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meijer, M. M. (2009). The effects of charity reputation on charitable giving. Corporate Reputation Review, 12(1), 33–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Middendorf, J., & Kalish, A. (1996). The "change-up" in lectures. The National Teaching and Learning Forum, 5(2), 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, J. M., Schultz, P. W., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J., & Griskevicius, V. (2008). Normative social influence is under detected. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(7), 913–923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okun, M. A., & Sloane, E. S. (2002). Application of planned behavior theory to predicting volunteer enrolment by college students in a campus-based program. Social Behavior and Personality, 30, 243–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oosterhof, L., Heuvelman, A., & Peters, O. (2009). Donation to disaster relief campaigns: Underlying social cognitive factors exposed. Evaluation and Program Planning, 32(2), 148–157.

  • Peloza, J., & Hassay, D. (2007). A typology of charity support behaviors: toward a holistic view of helping. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 17(1/2), 135–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peter, J. P. (1981). Construct validity: a review of basic issues and marketing practices. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(2), 133–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petty, R. E., Unnava, R. H., & Strathman, A. J. (1991). Theories of attitude change. In T. S. Robertson & H. H. Kassarjian (Eds.), Handbook of consumer behavior (pp. 241-280). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

  • Ranganathan, S. K., & Henley, W. H. (2008). Determinants of charitable donation intentions: a structural equation model. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 13(1), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reitsma, J., Scheepers, P., & Grotenhuis, M. T. (2006). Dimensions of individual religiosity and charity: cross-national effect differences in European countries? Review of Religious Research, 347–362.

  • Reve, T. (1979). Construct validation in marketing: a comparison of methods in assessing the validity of the affective, conative, and cognitive components of attitudes. Advances in Consumer Research, 6, 288–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rex, J., Lobo, A., & Leckie, C. (2015). Evaluating the drivers of sustainable behavioral intentions: an application and extension of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 27(3), 263–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivis, A., Sheeran, P., & Armitage, C. J. (2009). Expanding the affective and normative components of the theory of planned behavior: a meta-analysis of anticipated affect and moral norms. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39(12), 2985–3019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sargeant, A. (2014). A retrospective-charitable giving: towards a model of donor behaviour. Social Business, 4(4), 293–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sargeant, A., & Woodliffe, L. (2007). Building donor loyalty: the antecedents and role of commitment in the context of charity giving. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 18(2), 47–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sargeant, A., West, D. C., & Jay, E. (2007). The relational determinants of nonprofit website fundraising effectiveness: an exploratory study. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 18(2), 141–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. B. (2015). Yes, subjective norms are important, but let’s not lose sight of cultural differences. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46(10), 1310–1313. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022115599444.

  • Smith, J., & McSweeney, A. (2007). Charitable giving: the effectiveness of a revised theory of planned behaviour model in predicting donating intentions and behavior. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 17(5), 363–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turcotte, M. (2015). Volunteering and charitable giving in Canada. Spotlight on Canadians: results from the General social survey. Retrieved from http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/89-652-x/89-652-x2015001-eng.pdf

  • van der Linden, S. (2011). Charitable intent: a moral or social construct? A revised theory of planned behavior model. Current Psychology, 30(4), 355–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veldhuizen, I., Ferguson, E., de Kort, W., Donders, R., & Atsma, F. (2011). Exploring the dynamics of the theory of planned behavior in the context of blood donation: does donation experience make a difference? Transfusion, 51(11), 2425–2437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warburton, J., & Terry, D. J. (2000). Volunteer decision making by older people: a test of a revised theory of planned behavior. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 22(3), 245–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, D. J., Green, C. L., & Brashear, T. G. (2000). Development and validation of scales to measure attitudes influencing monetary donations to charitable organizations. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2), 299–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wymer, W., & Alves, H. M. B. (2013). Scale development research in nonprofit management & marketing: a content analysis and recommendation for best practices. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 10(1), 65–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Royal Roads University, 2005 Sooke Road, Victoria, BC, V9B 5Y2, Canada

    Robert Mittelman

  2. Sprott School of Business, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario, K1S 5B6, Canada

    José Rojas-Méndez

Authors
  1. Robert Mittelman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. José Rojas-Méndez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Mittelman.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mittelman, R., Rojas-Méndez, J. Why Canadians give to charity: an extended theory of planned behaviour model. Int Rev Public Nonprofit Mark 15, 189–204 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-018-0197-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-018-0197-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation