Skip to main content
Log in

An approach to market orientation in the basic units of public action

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bearing in mind that market orientation can vary from one level to another of the same organisation and that most, if not all, of the studies carried out in the field of public service orientation focus on an institutional level or a hierarchical level of strategic decision-making, this paper concentrates on the analysis of public service orientation in a basic unit of public action within a government, i.e. on a hierarchical level of the tactical and operational sphere of public action. The analysis of public service orientation and its consequences was carried out on the basic unit of public action for development of the Social Economy of the Basque Country, by means of a total of 9 semi-structured interviews aimed at specific key informants. The specific characteristics of the public service orientation construct, its dimensions and its consequences are defined in the basic units of public action, along with certain points regarding the key informants to be used in this field of study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. It is not the aim of this article to go into detail of all these debates; however, as for us, it is important to underline that there is a wide literature concerning the limits – Arndt (1978), Carman (1973), Bartels (1974), Luck (1974), Foxall (1989), Howe (1990)– and extension –Alderson (1965), Kotler (1972), Hunt (1976), Trustrum (1989), Alderson and Cox (1948), Munuera (1992), Vázquez (2004) of the concept of marketing.

  2. This line of thought raises the question of the existence of non-business marketing as a specific area within the discipline which, in turn, is made up of sub-areas of non-profit, public marketing, social marketing and political and electoral marketing (see, for example, Santesmases, 2012: 927 or Rufín and Medina, 2012: 23).

  3. Laverie and Murphy (1993) review a representative selection of papers published on marketing and public policies between 1982 and 1991 and detect that 75% of them refer to aspects such as publicity, consumption, energy conservation, fraudulent practices, legal aspects and general marketing in the public sector.

  4. The concept of “customer of the citizens” must be understood as a need for greater commitment, activism on both parts, the incorporation not only of individuals but of groups or associations (Subirats, 1992). The change in the management model of the European public sector, at both state and local corporation levels, has resulted in the promotion of public services, with users being regarded as customers rather than administrators (Bouinot and Bermils, 1995). Spain has tended towards the use of the term customer, especially in the processes of modernisation of the Public Administration (Chias, 1995).

  5. This slant indicates the tendency of subjects to express agreement with the item, regardless of its content (Ray, 1990) or the tendency to respond always in the affirmative. Based on Cervera et al. (1999a, b) and following Gil (1995) and Carman’s fine distinctions (1990), items in a negative sense are included.

  6. The items whose removal improved Cronbach’s alpha and those with low correlation in the reliability analysis of the scales were eliminated.

  7. This entire process was carried out between December 2012 and January 2013.

  8. Various authors criticise the correlational approach to validity although some defend its empirical testing (Hayduk, 1996) whereas others defend the notion of validity as being a merely qualitative assertion (Borsboom et al., 2004). Both groups share the notion of the validity of the scales or indicators of a latent variable as a qualitative assertion, but according to Hayduk it must be compared empirically by means of model-based testing.

  9. However Nunnally (1967) proposed values of α ≥ 0.5 o α ≥ 0.6, which he then changed to α ≥ 0.7 (Nunnally, 1978) with no apparent explanation. Moreover, reliability is considered to be acceptable when it is not lower than 0.5–0.6 (Hair et al., 1999).

  10. That is, the scale that adds the validated and tested scale plus those items which were omitted for reasons of improvement in the reliability of the scale.

References

  • Agirre, I. (2009), La orientación al mercado en la organización cooperativa. Aplicación empírica en los negocios del área industrial de Mondragón, PhD thesis, Mondragón: Mondragon Unibertsitatea.

  • Aguirre, I., Reinares, P., & Agirre, A. (2014). Antecedents to market orientation in the worker cooperative organization: The Mondragon group. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 85(3), 387–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alderson, W. (1965). Dynamic marketing behaviour: A functionalist theory of marketing. Homewood, Illinois: Richard D. Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alderson, W., & Cox, R. (1948). Towards a theory of marketing. Journal of Marketing, 13(2), 137–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Álvarez, L. I., Vijande, M. L., & Vázquez, R. (2002). The market orientation concept in the private nonprofit organizational domain. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 7(1), 55–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arndt, J. (1978). How broad should the marketing concept be? Journal of Marketing, 42(1), 101–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P. (1975). Marketing as exchange. Journal of Marketing., 39(4), 32–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balabanis, G., Stables, R. E., & Phillips, H. C. (1997). Market orientation in the top 200 Brithis charity organizations and its impact on their performance. European Journal of Marketing., 31(8), 583–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartels, R. (1974). The identity crisis in marketing. Journal of Marketing., 38(4), 73–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, J., & Homburg, C. (1999). Market-oriented management: A systems-based perspective. Journal of Market Focused Management., 4(1), 17–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, R. (1998). Charities, organizational learning and market orientation. Journal of Marketing Practice., 4(1), 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhuian, S. N. (1992). Market orientation and successful not-for-profit marketing: direct relationship and the influence of professionalism, entrepreneurship, competition and demand, PhD thesis, Texas Tech University.

  • Bohrnstedt, G. W. (1976): Evaluación de la confiabilidad y validez en la medición de actitudes, In: Summers, G. F.: Medición de actitudes. Trillas, Mexico D.F.

  • Borsboom, D., Mellenberg, G. J., & Van Heerden, J. (2004). The concept of validity. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1061–1071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouinot, J., & Bermils, B. (1995). La gestión stratégique des villes: Entre compétition et coopération. Paris: Editions Armand Colin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, K. E. (1956). General systems theory-the skeleton of science. Management Science., 2(3), 197–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouzas-Lorenzo, R. A. (2010). Public sector marketing, political science and the science of public administration: The evolution of a transdisciplinary dialogue. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing., 7(2), 113–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cadogan, J. W., & Diamantopoulos, A. (1995). Narver and Slater, Kohli and Jaworski and the market orientation construct: Integration and internationalization. Journal of Strategic Management., 3(1), 41–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T. (1955). The informant in quantitative research. American Journal of Sociology., 60(4), 339–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carman, J.M. (1973): On the identity of marketing, Contemporary Business. Vol. 2, Fall,1–16.

  • Carmines, E. G., & Zeller, R. A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Caruana, A., Ramaseshan, B., & Ewing, M. T. (1998). The marketing orientation-performance link: Some evidence from the public sector and Universities. Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing., 6(1), 63–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cervera, A. (1999a). Marketing y Orientación al Mercado en la Administración Pública Local. Valencia: Institució Alfons el Magnànim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cervera, A. (1999b). Construcción de una modelo de orientación al mercado en las Administraciones Públicas. Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa., 5(3), 41–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cervera, A. (2001). La gestión del marketing en la administración pública local. Dirección y organización: Revista de Dirección, Organización y Administración de empresas., 26, 113–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cervera, A. (2004). Orientación al mercado y Administración Pública Local: Determinación de una modelo teórico y de medición. Revista Internacional de Marketing Público y No Lucrativo., 1(1), 53–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cervera, A., Mollá, A., & Haydée, C. (1999a). Market orientation: A framework for public institutions. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing., 7(1), 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cervera, A., Sánchez, M., & Gil, I. (1999b). Desarrollo de una escala de orientación al mercado en el ámbito de las Administraciones Públicas. Revista Española de Investigación de Marketig-ESIC., 3(2), 55–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chias, J. (1995). Marketing Público. Por un Gobierno y una Administración al servicio del público. Madrid: McGraw-Hill Interamericana de España.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chias, J. (2007). “Marketing Público en España y Latinoamérica: algunas consideraciones” In Kotler, Philip and Lee, Nancy (pp. 489–499). Madrid: Marketing en el Sector Publico. Todas las claves para su mejora. Pearson Educación.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowell, D. W. (1981). The Role of Market Research in the Development of Public Policy in the Field of Recreation and Leisure. Journal of the Market Research Society, 23(2), 72–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowell, D. W. (1991). Mercadeo de Servicios. Legis: Bogotá.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, J. (2000). Market orientation and company profitability: Further evidence incorporating longitudinal data. Australian Journal of Management., 25(2), 173–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamantopolous, A., & Hart, S. (1993). Linking market orientation and company performance: Preliminary evidence on Kohli and Jaworski’s framework. Journal of Strategic Management, 1(2), 93–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliashberg, J., & Michie, D. A. (1984). Multiple business coals sets as determinants os marketing channel conflict: An empirical study. Journal of Marketing Research, 21, 75–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández, Á. (1999). La investigación cualitativa. In F. J. Sarabia (Ed.), Metodología para la investigación en marketing y dirección de empresas. Madrid: Pirámide.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavián, C., & Lozano, F. J. (2006). Organizational Antecedents of market orientation in the public University system. International Journal of Public Sector Management., 19(5), 447–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flavián, C., & Lozano, F. J. (2007). Market orientation of Spanish public Universities: A suitable response to growing competition. Journal of Marketing of Higher Education., 17(1), 91–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foxall, G. (1989). Marketing’s domain. European Journal of Marketing., 23(8), 7–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gainer, B., & Padanyi, P. (2005). The relationship between market-oriented activities and market-oriented culture: Implications for the development of market orientation in nonprofit service organizations. Journal of Business Research., 58(6), 854–865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaski, J. F., & Etzel, M. J. (1986). The index of consumer sentiment toward marketing. Journal of Marketing, 50(3), 71–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, W. R., & Compton, F. (1985). How to initiate a marketing perspective in a health services organization. Journal of Health Care Marketing., 5(1), 29–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gil, I. (1995). La calidad de servicio percibida y la selección del punto de venta. Madrid: Club Gestión de Calidad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gounaris, S. P., & Avlonitis, G. J. (1996). Marketing orientation: A powerful, and fruitful, competitive edge for industrial marketers. In A. Bauer & J. Simon (Eds.), Marketing for an Expanding Europe proceedings of the 25th EMAC annual conference (pp. 491–509). EMAC: Budapest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grönroos, C. (1989). Defining marketing: A market-oriented approach. European Journal of Marketing., 23(1), 52–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grönroos, C. (1994). Marketing y Gestión de Servicios. Madrid: Díaz de Santos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1999). Análisis Multivariante (5th edition). Madrid: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th edition). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayden, V. (1993). How to increase market orientation. Journal of Management in Medicine., 7(1), 29–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayduk, L. A. (1996). LISREL Issues, Debates and Strategies. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, F. (1990). Marketing for Nonprofit Organizations: A Snare & Delusion. In C. H. Lovelock & C. B. Weinberg (Eds.), Public & Nonprofit Marketing. Readings & Cases (pp. 17–21). San Francisco: The Scientific Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D. (1976). The nature and scope of marketing. Journal of Marketing., 40(3), 17–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurley, R. F., & Hult, G. T. M. (1998). Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: An integration and empirical examination. Journal of Marketing., 62(3), 42–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohli, A. K., & Jaworski, B. J. (1990). Market orientation: The construct, research propositions and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing., 54(2), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohli, A. K., Jaworski, B. J., & Kumar, A. (1993). MARKOR: A measure of market orientation. Journal of Marketing Research, 30(4), 467–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P. (1972). A generic concept of marketing. Journal of Marketing., 36(2), 46–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P., & Lee, N. (2007). Marketing en el Sector Público. Todas las claves para su mejora. Madrid: Pearson Educación.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P., & Levy, S. J. (1969). Broadening the concept of marketing. Journal of Marketing., 33(1), 10–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, C. (1987). Public sector marketing is different. Business Horizons., 30(4), 46–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambin, J. J. (1995): .

  • Laufer, R. (1976). Le marketing du service public. Revue Française de Gestion., 7, 72–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laufer, R., & Burlaud, A. (1989). Dirección Pública: gestión y legitimidad. Madrid: INAP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laverie, D. A., & Murphy, P. E. (1993). The marketing and public policy literature: A look at the past ten years. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 12(2), 258–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • López, J., & Gadea, A. (1995). Servir al ciudadano. Gestión de la calidad en la Administración Pública. Ediciones. Gestión 2000, Barcelona.

  • Luck, D. J. (1974). Social marketing: Confusion compounded. Journal of Marketing., 38(4), 70–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marketing Staff of The Ohio State University. (1965). A statement of marketing philosophy. Journal of Marketing., 29(1), 43–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martín, E. (1993). Marketing. Barcelona: Ariel.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, E. J., & Perreault, W. D. (1993). Basic marketing: A global-managerial approach (11th ed.). Homewood, Illinois: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miquel, S., Bigné, E., Sánchez, J., Moliner, M. A., & Vallet, T. M. (1995). El marketing de los servicios públicos administrativos. In U. de Castilla-La Mancha (Ed.), La innovación en la empresa: IX Congreso Nacional – V Congreso Hispano-Francés de AEDEM (pp. 2287–2299). AEDEM: Toledo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munuera, J. L. (1992). Evolución en las dimensiones del concepto de marketing. Revista de Economía., 707, 126–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narver, J. C., & Slater, S. F. (1990). The effects of a market orientation on business profitability. Journal of Marketing., 54(4), 20–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narver, J. C., Slater, S. F., & MacLachlan, D. L. (2001). “Total market orientation, business performance and innovation”, working paper series, market science institute, Cambridge (Massachusetts), 01 October.

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1967). Psychometric theory (1st ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Rourke, Norm, Hatcher, Larry, and Stepanski, Edward J. (2005). A step-by-step approach to using SAS for univariate & multivariate statistics (2nd edition.). Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.

  • OECD. (1996). La Administración al Servicio del Público (3th edition), Instituto Nacional de Administración Pública. Madrid: Ministerio para las Administración Pública.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortega, E. (1977). El Marketing en el Sector Público y en las instituciones no lucrativas. Esic Market., 21, 15–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortega, E. (2010). La investigación en marketing a través de las Tesis Doctorales españolas. Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa., 16(1), 127–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramió, C. (1999). Teoría de la Organización y Administración Pública. Madrid: Tecnos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, J. J. (1990). Acquiescence and problems with forced-choice scales. The Journal of Social Psychology, 130, 397–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, J. R. B., & La Brèque, R. J. (1975). Marketing research and public policy: A functional perspective. Journal of Marketing., 39(3), 12–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Röber, M. (1989). Posibilidades y límites del marketing público. Notas desde una perspectiva de Ciencia Administrativa, Documentación Administrativa, 218-219, 437–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruekert, R. W. (1992). Developing a market orientation: An organizational strategy perspective. International Journal of Research in Marketing., 9(3), 225–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rufín, R., & Medina, C. (2012). Marketing Público: Investigación, aplicaciones y estrategia. Madrid: ESIC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samino, R. (2006). La Orientación al Mercado en las Organizaciones Privadas No Lucrativas de Madrid Capital, PhD thesis, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid.

  • Santesmases, M. (2009). Dyane Versión 4. Diseña y análisis de encuestas en investigación social y de mercados. Madrid: Ediciones Pirámide.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santesmases, Miguel (2012): Marketing: Conceptos y estrategias (6ªEd.), Ediciones Pirámide, Madrid.

  • Silk, Alvin J. y Kalwani, Manohar U. (1982): “Measuring influence in organizational purchase decision”, Journal of Marketing Research 19, 165–181.

  • Snavely, K. (1991). Marketing in the Government Sector: A public policy model. American Review of Public Administration., 21(4), 311–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subirats, J. (1992). Un problema de estilo: La formación de políticas públicas en España. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trespalacios, J. A., Del Río, A., Iglesias, V., & Sanzo, M. J. (1997). Dimensiones de la Orientación al Mercado y sus efectos en las Empresas del Sector Agroalimentario. IX Encuentros de Profesores Universitarios de Marketing, Murcia.

  • Trustrum, L. B. (1989). Marketing: Concept and function. European Journal of Marketing, 23(3), 48–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vázquez, José L. (2004): “Pasado, presente y futuro de las dimensiones pública y social en el desarrollo conceptual del marketing”, Revista Internacional de Marketing Público y No Lucrativo. 1 1, Junio, pp. 9–34.

  • Vázquez, J. L., & Placer, J. L. (2000). Cinco temas de introducción al marketing público. León: Imprenta Moderna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vázquez, R., Álvarez, L. I., & Santos, M. L. (2002). Marketing orientation and social services in private non-profit organisations. European Journal of Marketing, 36(9/10), 1022–1046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, K. (1994). Marketing and public sector management. European Journal of Marketing., 28(3), 63–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, V. R., & Bhuian, S. N. (1993). Market orientation and nonprofit organizations: Performance associations and research propositions. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 1(1), 7–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, V. R., Bhuian, S. N., & Kieker, P. (2000). Market orientation and organizational performance in nom-for-profit hospitals. Journal of Business Research, 48(3), 213–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, K. (1991). Consumer-centred approaches in the public/voluntary/personal services. Public Money & Management, 11(2), 33–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jon Morandeira Arca.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Arca, J.M., De Elizagarate Gutiérrez, V. & Egiguren, I.L. An approach to market orientation in the basic units of public action. Int Rev Public Nonprofit Mark 14, 409–426 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-017-0180-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-017-0180-4

Keywords

Navigation