Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Does organizational reputation influence the willingness to donate blood?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In Germany, blood donation organizations face a highly competitive environment when it comes to winning new donors and keeping regular donors loyal. Especially in highly competitive markets intangible assets such as organizational reputation and nonprofit brands have shown to be of great importance. This paper examines if blood donation organizations can significantly change the willingness to donate blood among potential blood donors by changing their organizational reputation. Results of an online experiment with 144 potential blood donors show that organizational reputation is easily damaged by negative news in the press and that this leads to a significantly lower willingness to donate blood for this organization among potential donors. Therefore, from a management perspective, the results show that blood donation organizations have to be extremely careful to avoid that negative news is spread and actively manage their reputation. Implications for blood donation management and suggestions for future research are made.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaker JL (1997) Dimensions of brand personality. J Mark Res 34(3):347–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abimbola T, Vallaster C (2007) Brand, organisational identity and reputation in SMEs: an overview. Qualitative Market Res 10(4):341–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahluwalia R, Burnkrant RE, Unnava HR (2000) Consumer response to negative publicity: the moderating role of commitment. J Mark Res 37(2):203–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen I (1985) From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. In: Kuhl J, Beckman J (eds) Action-control: from cognition to behavior. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 11–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50(2):179–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson NH (1981) Integration theory applied to cognitive responses and attitudes. In: Petty RE, Ostrom TM, Brock TC (eds) Cognitive responses in persuasion. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, pp 361–397

    Google Scholar 

  • Ariely D, Bracha A, Meier S (2009) Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially. American Econ Rev 99(1):544–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bednall TC, Bove LL (2011) Donating blood: a meta-analytic review of self-reported motivators and deterrents. Transfus Med Rev 25(4):317–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bekkers R, Wiepking P (2011) A literature review of empirical studies of philanthropy: eight mechanisms that drive charitable giving. Nonprofit Volunt Sect Q 40(5):924–973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett R (2008) Marketing of voluntary organizations as contract providers of national and local government welfare services in the UK. Voluntas Int J Volunt Nonprofit Organizations 19(3):268–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett R, Ali-Choudhury R (2009) Second-gift behaviour of first-time donors to charity: An empirical study. Int J Nonprofit Volunt Sect Mark 14(3):161–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett R, Gabriel H (2003) Image and reputational characteristics of UK charitable organizations: an empirical study. Corporate Reput Rev 6(3):276–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boenigk S, Leipnitz S, Scherhag C (2011) Altruistic values, satisfaction and loyalty among first-time blood donors. Int J Nonprofit Volunt Sect Mark 16(4):356–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown B, Logsdon JM (1997) Factors influencing Fortune’s corporate reputation for “community and environmental responsibility”. In: J. Weber J, Rehbein K (ed). IABS proceedings (Eight annual conference), International Association for Business and Society, Destin, pp 184–189

  • Caruana A, Cohen C, Krentler KA (2006) Corporate reputation and shareholders’ intentions: An attitudinal perspective. J Brand Manag 13(6):429–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deephouse DL (2000) Media reputation as a strategic resource: An integration of mass communication and resource-based theories. J Manag 26(6):1091–1112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson B, McNicholas C (2004) Understanding the postgraduate education market for UK-based students: a review and empirical study. Int J Nonprofit Volunt Sect Mark 9(4):346–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ettensen R, Knowles J (2008) Don’t confuse reputation with brand. MITSloan Manage Rev 49(2):19–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Montoya A, López-Berrio A, Castillo JD Luna des (1998) How some attitudes, beliefs and motivations of Spanish blood donors evolve over time. Vox Sang 74(3):140–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrari JR, Barone RC, Jason LA, Rose T (1985) The use of incentives to increase blood donations. J Social Psychol 125(6):791–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun CJ (1996) Reputation: realizing value from the corporate image. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun CJ, Gardberg NA, Sever JM (2000) The reputation quotient: a multi-stakeholder measure of corporate reputation. J Brand Manag 7(4):241–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun CJ, van Riel C (1997) The reputational landscape. Corporate Reputation Rev 1(1):5–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • France JL, France CR, Himawan LK (2007) A path analysis of intention to redonate among experienced blood donors: An extension of the theory of planned behavior. Transfus 47(6):1006–1013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher M, Radcliffe VS (2002) Internal controls in nonprofit organizations. Nonprof Manag Leader 12(3):313–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • German Red Cross Blood Donation Services (ed) (2011) Ethischer Kodex für Blutspenden und Bluttransfusionen – 1980. http://www.drk-blutspende.de/blutspendedienste/ethischer_kodex.php. Accessed 2 November 2011

  • Giles M, McClenahan C, Cairns E, Mallet J (2004) An application of the theory of planned behaviour to blood donation: the importance of self-efficacy. Health Educ Res 19(4):380–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glynn SA, Kleinman SH, Schreiber GB, Zuck T, McCombs S, Bethel J, Garratty G, Williams AE (2002) Motivations to donate blood: demographic comparisons. Transfus 42(2):216–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glynn SA, Williams AE, Nass CC, Bethel J, Kessler D, Scott EP, Fridey J, Kleinman SH, Schreiber GB (2003) Attitudes towards blood donation incentives in the United States: implications for donor recruitment. Transfus 43(1):7–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godin G, Conner M, Sheeran P, Germain M (2008) Asking questions changes behavior: mere measurement effects on frequency of blood donation. Health Psychol 27(2):179–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greinacher A, Fendrich K, Alpen U, Hoffmann W (2007) Impact of demographic changes on the blood supply: Mecklemburg-West Pomerania as a model region for Europe. Transfus 47(3):395–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handy F (1995) Reputation as collateral: an economic analysis of the role of trustees of nonprofits. Nonprofit Volunt Sect Q 24(4):293–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handy F, Cnaan RA, Brudney JL, Ascoli U, Meijs LCMP, Ranade S (2000) Public perception of “who is a volunteer”: an examination of the net-cost approach from a cross-cultural perspective. Voluntas Int J Volunt Nonprofit Organizations 11(1):45–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hankinson P (2001) Brand orientation in the charity sector: a framework for discussion and research. Int J Nonprofit Volunt Sect Mark 6(3):231–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helmig B, Jegers M, Lapsley I (2004) Challenges in managing nonprofit organizations: a research overview. Voluntas: Int J Volunt Nonprofit Organizations 15(2):101–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helmig B, Boenigk S (2012) Nonprofit Management, Vahlen, Munich

  • Helmig B, Thaler J (2010) On the effectiveness of social marketing - What do we really know? J Nonprofit Public Sect Mark 22(4):264–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes PN, Luksetich WA (1999) The relationship among funding sources for art and history museums. Nonprofit Manag Leader 10(1):21–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hupfer ME, Taylor DW, Letwin JA (2005) Understanding Canadian student motivations and beliefs about giving blood. Transfus 45(2):149–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lafferty BA, Goldsmith RE, Hult GTM (2004) The impact of the alliance of the partners: a look at cause-brand alliances. Psychol Mark 21(7):509–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClellan A, Rebello-Rao D, Wyszomirski MJ (1999) Resisting invisibility - Arts organizations and the pursuit of persistent presence. Nonprofit Manag Leader 10(2):169–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Napoli J (2006) The impact of nonprofit brand orientation on organisational performance. J Mark Manag 22(7):673–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson Sojka B, Sojka P (2008) The blood donation experience: self reported motives and obstacles for donating blood. Vox Sang 94(1):56–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Oswalt RM, Napoliello M (1974) Motivations of blood donors and nondonors. J Appl Psychol 59(1):122–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul-Ehrlich-Institute (ed.) (2010) Bericht zur Meldung nach § 21 TFG für die Jahre 2008 und 2009. http://www.pei.de/cln_236/nn_156172/SharedDocs/Downloads/bgbl/2010/2010-21-tfg-bericht-2008-2009,templateId=raw,property=publicationFile.pdf/2010-21-tfg-bericht-2008-2009.pdf. Accessed 2 November 2011

  • Ritchie RJB, Swami S, Weinberg CB (1999) A brand new world for nonprofits. Int J Nonprofit Volunt Sect Mark 4(1):26–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts PW, Dowling GR (2002) Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance. Strategic Manag J 23(12):1077–1093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roller RH (1996) Strategy formulation in nonprofit social services organizations: a proposed framework. Nonprof Manag Leader 7(2):137–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez AM, Ameti DI, Schreiber GB, Thomson RA, Lo A, Bethel J, Williams AE (2001) The potential impact on incentives on future blood donation behavior. Transfus 41(2):172–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarstedt M, Schloderer MP (2010) Developing a measurement approach for reputation of non-profit organizations. Int J Nonprofit Volunt Sect Mark 15(3):276–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Seifried E, Klueter H, Weidmann C, Staudenmaier T, Schrezenmeier H, Henschler R, Greinacher A, Mueller MM (2011) How much blood is needed? Vox Sang 100(1):10–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shamma HM, Hassan SS (2009) Perspectives for examining corporate reputation. J Prod Brand Manag 18(5):326–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson M Jr, Schnitzer MH (2006) Interorganizational trust, boundary spanning, and humanitarian relief coordination. Nonprofit Manag Leader 17(2):211–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thaler J, Helmig B (2012) Promoting good behavior: does social and temporal framing make a difference?, Voluntas: Int J Volunt Nonprofit Organizations, Online First

  • Trochim WMK (1985) Pattern matching, validity, and conceptualization in program evaluation. Evaluation Rev 9(5):575–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tscheulin DK, Lindenmeier J (2005) The willingness to donate blood: an empirical analysis of socio-demographic and motivation-related determinants. Health Serv Manag Res 18(3):165–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turban DA, Greening DW (1997) Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Acad Manag J 40(3):658–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Dongen A, Abraham C, Ruiter RAC, Schaalma HP, de Kort W, Dijkstra JA, Veldhuizen I (2011) Are lapsed donors willing to resume blood donation, and what determines their motivation to do so? Transfus 52(6):1296–1302

    Google Scholar 

  • Veldhuizen I, Wagenmans E (2009) Domain survey on donor management in Europe. In: de Kort W, Veldhuizen I (eds) Donor management manual pp. 22-30. http://www.domaine-europe.eu/ManualPDF/tabid/115/Default.aspx Accessed 15 November 2011

  • Venable BT, Rose GM, Gilbert FW (2003) Measuring the brand personality of non-profit organizations. In: Keller PA, Rook DW (eds) Advances in consumer research volume 30. Association for Consumer Research, Valdosta, pp 379–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker K (2010) A systematic review of the corporate reputation literature: definition, measurement, and theory. Corporate Reput Rev 12(4):357–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wartick S (2002) Measuring corporate reputation: definition and data. Bus Soc 41(4):371–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wymer W, Samu S (2009) The influence of cause marketing associations on product and cause brand value. Int J Nonprofit Volunt Sect Mark 14(1):1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Management of Public, Private & Nonprofit Organizations, University of Hamburg, Von-Melle-Park 5, 20146, Hamburg, Germany

    Marius Mews & Silke Boenigk

Authors
  1. Marius Mews
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Silke Boenigk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marius Mews.

Appendices

Appendix I

Table 3 Socio-demographics of the sample (N = 144)
Full size table

Appendix II

Table 4 Items to measure the reputation of a blood donation organization
Full size table

Appendix III Original reputation treatments in group A

figure a

Organization names (italic) anonymized for publication. English translations of treatment texts are available upon request.

Appendix IV Original reputation treatment in group B

figure b

Organization names (italic) anonymized for publication. English translations of treatment texts are available upon request.

Appendix V

Table 5 Manipulation check
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mews, M., Boenigk, S. Does organizational reputation influence the willingness to donate blood?. Int Rev Public Nonprofit Mark 10, 49–64 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-012-0090-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-012-0090-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation