Skip to main content
Log in

Clients’ Self-reported Legal Issues in a Medical-Legal Partnership: Accuracy, Prevalence, and the Role of Mental Health

  • Published:
Psychological Injury and Law Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There has been growing interest in medical-legal partnership (MLP), a model which connects healthcare facilities with legal clinics to help address clients’ civil legal needs (e.g., evictions and child custody matters). More research is needed on best practices for legal needs screening and identification of subpopulations vulnerable to complex legal issues. In this study, we examined client intake and other linked administrative data from the Connecticut Veterans Legal Center which is partnered with the Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System. We aimed to examine (1) the frequency of accurate client self-reports of legal issues as compared to the legal issue identified by an attorney, (2) the extent to which clients reported repeated past and current legal issues, and (3) associations between clients’ mental health diagnoses and number of self-reported legal issues. Among 73 clients in the sample, 47 (64.4%) had a match between their self-report legal issue and the attorney-identified legal issue and 46 (74.2% of 62 clients who reported past and current issues) had at least one repeated issue. In adjusted Poisson regression models estimating the association between mental health diagnosis and clients’ number of current legal issues, clients with posttraumatic stress disorder (b = 0.32, 95% CI = 0.01, 0.63), and alcohol use disorder (b = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.15, 0.74), reported more current legal issues on average compared to those without these diagnoses. Future research should examine how best to identify and support clients’ legal needs, and how these needs interact with mental health challenges.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Data Availability

Data for this study can be made available upon reasonable request by contacting the last author with proper institutional review board approval and authorization from the Connecticut Veterans Legal Center.

References

Download references

Funding

Writing of this manuscript was supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Academic Affiliations Advanced Fellowship Program in Health Services Research, the Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), VA Boston Healthcare System (for I. Griesemer). In-kind support was provided by the Department of Veterans Affairs, National Center on Homelessness among Veterans and the Connecticut Veterans Legal Center.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ida Griesemer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors (Griesemer, Carter, Weir, Tsai) declare they have no conflicts of interest. Weir and Carter work for the Connecticut Veterans Legal Center which is the study site.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 20 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Griesemer, I., Carter, S., Weir, A.M. et al. Clients’ Self-reported Legal Issues in a Medical-Legal Partnership: Accuracy, Prevalence, and the Role of Mental Health. Psychol. Inj. and Law 16, 408–415 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-023-09484-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-023-09484-2

Keywords

Navigation