Skip to main content
Log in

Complex trauma and the question of reasonableness of response in sexual harassment cases: Issues for treatment providers and forensic evaluators

  • Published:
Psychological Injury and Law Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper discusses considerations for treating or evaluating sexual harassment claims in individuals with a history of complex trauma. The author reviews how a history of repeated trauma in early childhood increases risk for later victimization, including sexual harassment (Courtois & Ford, 2013; Herman, 1992). Further, she provides a brief overview of how attachment disruptions and other adverse childhood experiences (ACE) create difficulties with emotion and interpersonal regulation. She discusses how the complexity of the symptom profile provides a unique context for therapeutic intervention and evaluation, as well as the importance of staying firmly grounded in one’s role when the courts are involved (Greenberg & Shuman Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 28(1), 50–57, 1997). Utilizing her more than 30 years of experience as a forensic evaluator, the author provides case material throughout the manuscript to highlight potential pitfalls and strategies for maintaining the therapeutic alliance or role as a forensic evaluator.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brown, L.S. Complex trauma and the question of reasonableness of response in sexual harassment cases: Issues for treatment providers and forensic evaluators. Psychol. Inj. and Law 13, 155–166 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-020-09378-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-020-09378-7

Keywords

Navigation