Examination of Select Psychometric Characteristics of Independent Living Scales Factors
- 24 Downloads
The purpose of this article was to examine select psychometrics of two factors—Performance/Information and Problem Solving—of Managing Money and Health and Safety, two subscales of the Independent Living Scales (ILS). These two factors are designed to assess different cognitive functions. We examined (1) the internal reliability of the subscales and (2) correlations of these subscales with other neuropsychological measures in two samples. One sample consisted of college students (N = 105) and the other of individuals undergoing a court-ordered competency assessment (N = 71) with a range of various developmental, psychiatric, and/or neurological disorders. For both factors on both subscales, we found that the internal reliabilities for the college sample were poor but adequate for the competency-based cases. In contrast, our findings were similar for the correlational analyses for both subscales, where the pattern of correlations was generally not significantly different between both factors and several neuropsychological measures. These tests varied across samples but were assessed a range of abilities including intelligence, attention, processing speed, set shifting, mathematics, verbal fluency, and executive functioning. Implications of these finding are discussed as are ideas for future research.
KeywordsIndependent living scales Activities of daily living Capacity
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.
All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (national and institutional).
No animal studies were carried out by the author of this article.
- Cullum, C. M., Weiner, M. F., & Saine, K. C. (2009). Texas functional living scale examiner’s manual. San Antonio: Pearson.Google Scholar
- Demakis, G. J., Szczepkowski, K., & Johnson, A. (2019). Predictors of financial capacity in young adults. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 34, 503–510.Google Scholar
- Everhart, D. E., Lehockey, K. A., Moran, A. M., & Highsmith, J. M. (2012). Personal care and independence. In G. J. Demakis (Ed.), Civil capacities in clinical neuropsychology: Research findings and practical applications (pp. 139–162). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Heaton, R. K., Chelune, G. J., Talley, J. L., Kay, G. G., & Curtiss, G. (1993). Wisconsin card sorting test manual: Revised and expanded. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
- Heaton, R. K., Miller, S. W., Taylor, M. J., & Grant, I. (2004). Revised comprehensive norms of an expanded Halstead-Reitan Battery: Demographically adjusted neuropsychological norms for African American and Caucasian adults. Lutz: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
- Hustyi, K. M., Hall, S. S., Quintin, E. M., Chromik, L. C., Lightbody, A. A., & Reiss, A. L. (2015). The relationship between autistic symptomatology and independent living skills in adolescents and young adults with fragile X syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorder, 45, 1836–1844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kaufmann, P. (2012). Admissibility of expert opinions based on neuropsychological evidence. In G. J. Larrabee (Ed.), Forensic neuropsychology: A scientific approach (2nd ed., pp. 70–100). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Lange, R. T., Iverson, G. L., Zakrzewski, M. J., Ethel-King, P. E., & Franzen, M. D. (2005). Interpreting the trail making test following traumatic brain injury: Comparison of traditional time scores and derived indices. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 27, 897–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Loeb, P. A. (1996). Independent living scales manual. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
- Lowenstein, D. A., Amigo, E., Duara, R., Guterman, A., Hurwitz, D., Berkowitz, N., Wilkie, F., Weinberg, G., Black, B., Gittlelman, B., & Eisdorfer, C. (1989). A new scale for the assessment of functional status in Alzheimer’s disease and related disorders. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 44, 114–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mahoney, F., & Barthel, D. (1965). Functional evaluation: The Barthel index. Maryland State Medical Journal, 12, 61–65.Google Scholar
- Mitrushina, M. (2009). Cognitive screening measures. In I. Grant & K. M. Adams (Eds.), Neuropsychological assessment of neuropsychiatric and neuromedical disorders (3rd ed., pp. 101–126). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Reitan, R. M., & Wolfson, D. (1985). The Halsted-Reitan neuropsychological test battery. Tucson: Neuropsychology Press.Google Scholar
- Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1991). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
- Sheehan, T. J., DeChello, L. M., Garcia, R., Fifield, J., Rothfield, N., & Reisine, S. (2000). Measuring disability: Application of the Rasch model to activities of daily living (ADL/IADL). Journal of Outcome Measurement, 5, 839–863.Google Scholar
- Strauss, E., Sherman, E. M. S., & Spreen, O. (2006). A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms, and commentary (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Wechsler, D. (1997). Wechsler adult intelligence scale—III administration and scoring manual. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
- Wechsler, D. (2001). Wechsler test of adult Reading: WTAR. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
- Wechsler, D. (2008). Wechsler adult intelligence scale—IV technical and interpretive manual. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
- Wilkinson, G. S., & Robertson, G. J. (2006). WRAT4: Wide range achievement test professional manual. Lutz: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar