Expert Witnesses, Dissociative Amnesia, and Extraordinary Remembering: Response to Brand et al.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bergouignan, L., Nyberg, L., & Ehrsson, H. H. (2014). Out-of-body–induced hippocampal amnesia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 4421–4426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bernstein, E. M., & Putnam, F. W. (1986). Development, reliability, and validity of a dissociation scale. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 174, 727–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brand, B. L., Dalenberg, C. J., Frewen, P. A., Loewenstein, P. J., Schielke, H. J., Brams, J. S., & Spiegel, D. (2018). Trauma-related dissociation is no fantasy: addressing the errors of omissions and errors commission in Merckelbach and Patihis (2018). Psychological Injury & Law, 11, 377–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-018-9336-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brand, B. L., Schielke, H. J., & Brams, J. S. (2017). Assisting the courts in understanding and connecting with experiences of disconnection: addressing trauma-related dissociation as a forensic psychologist, part I. Psychological Injury and Law, 10, 283–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brand, B. L., Schielke, H. J., Brams, J. S., & DiComo, R. A. (2017). Assessing trauma-related dissociation in forensic contexts: addressing trauma-related dissociation as a forensic psychologist, part II. Psychological Injury and Law, 10, 298–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brenneis, C. B. (2000). Evaluating the evidence: can we find authenticated recovered memory? Psychoanalytic Psychology, 17, 61–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brown, D. W., Anda, R. F., Edwards, V. J., Felitti, V. J., Dube, S. R., & Giles, W. H. (2007). Adverse childhood experiences and childhood autobiographical memory disturbance. Child Abuse and Neglect, 31, 961–969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Edmond, G., Towler, A., Growns, B., Ribeiro, G., Found, B., White, D., et al. (2017). Thinking forensics: Cognitive science for forensic practitioners. Science & Justice, 57, 144–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Farrell, H. M. (2011). Dissociative identity disorder: medicolegal challenges. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 39, 402–406.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Freedman, R., Lewis, D. A., Michels, R., Pine, D. S., Schultz, S. K., Tamminga, C. A., et al. (2013). The initial field trials of DSM-5: new blooms and old thorns. American Journal of Psychiatry, 170, 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Herman, S., & Freitas, T. R. (2010). Error rates in forensic child sexual abuse evaluations. Psychological Injury and Law, 3, 133–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Holmes, D. S. (1994). Is there evidence for repression? Doubtful. Harvard Mental Health Letter, 10(12), 4–6.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hume, D. (1748/1977). An inquiry concerning human understanding. Indianapolis, In: Hackett. (Original work published in 1748).

  15. Imwinkelried, E. J. (2018). The best insurance against miscarriages of justice caused by junk science: An admissibility test that is scientifically and legally sound. Albany Law Review, 81, 851–875.

  16. Kassin, S. M., Tubb, V. A., & Hosch, H. M. (2001). On the'general acceptance'of eyewitness testimony research: a new survey of the experts. American Psychologist, 56, 405–416.

  17. Kleim, B., & Ehlers, A. (2008). Reduced autobiographical memory specificity predicts depression and posttraumatic stress disorder after recent trauma. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76, 231–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kritchevsky, M., Chang, J., & Squire, L. R. (2004). Functional amnesia: clinical description and neuropsychological profile of 10 cases. Learning & Memory, 11, 213–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lalonde, J. K., Hudson, J. I., Gigante, R. A., & Pope, H. G. (2001). Canadian and American psychiatrists' attitudes toward dissociative disorders diagnoses. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 46, 407–412.

  20. Laney, C., & Loftus, E. F. (2008). Emotional content of true and false memories. Memory, 16, 500–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Loftus, E. F. (2003). Memory in Canadian courts of law. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 44, 207–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Merckelbach, H., & Patihis, L. (2018). Why “trauma-related dissociation” is a misnomer in courts: a critical analysis of Brand et al. (2017a, b). Psychological Injury and Law, 11, 370–376.

  23. Patihis, L., Ho, L. Y., Loftus, E. F., & Herrera, M. E. (in press). Memory experts’ beliefs about repressed memory. Memory, 1–6. Published online first October 2018.https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2018.1532521

  24. Patihis, L., Ho, L. Y., Tingen, I. W., Lilienfeld, S. O., & Loftus, E. F. (2014). Are the “memory wars” over? A scientist-practitioner gap in beliefs about repressed memory. Psychological Science, 25, 519–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Patihis, L., & Pendergrast, M. H. (2019). Reports of recovered memories of abuse in therapy in a large age-representative US national sample: therapy type and decade comparisons. Clinical Psychological Science7, 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702618773315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Piper, A., Lillevik, L., & Kritzer, R. (2008). What’s wrong with believing in repression?: a review for legal professionals. Psychology, Public Policy, & Law, 14, 223–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Pope, H. G., Oliva, P. S., Hudson, J. I., Bodkin, J. A., & Gruber, A. J. (1999). Attitudes toward DSM-IV dissociative disorders diagnoses among board-certified American psychiatrists. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156, 321–323.

  28. Porter, S., Campbell, M. A., Birt, A. R., & Woodworth, M. T. (2003). “He said, she said”: a psychological perspective on historical memory evidence in the courtroom. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 44, 190–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Raymaekers, L., Smeets, T., Peters, M. J., & Merckelbach, H. (2010). Autobiographical memory specificity among people with recovered memories of childhood sexual abuse. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 41, 338–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rettew, D. C., Lynch, A. D., Achenbach, T. M., Dumenci, L., & Ivanova, M. Y. (2009). Meta-analyses of agreement between diagnoses made from clinical evaluations and standardized diagnostic interviews. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 18, 169–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rofé, Y. (2008). Does repression exist? Memory, pathogenic, unconscious and clinical evidence. Review of General Psychology, 12, 63–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sagan, C. (1979). Broca’s brain, reflections on the romance of science. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Saks, M. J., & Koehler, J. J. (2005). The coming paradigm shift in forensic identification science. Science, 309, 892–895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Stockdale, G. D., Gridley, B. E., Balogh, D. W., & Holtgraves, T. (2002). Confirmatory factor analysis of single and multiple-factor competing models of the dissociative experiences scale in a nonclinical sample. Assessment, 9, 94–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Takarangi, M. K., Polaschek, D. L., Garry, M. A., & Loftus, E. F. (2008). Psychological science, victim advocates, and the problem of recovered memories. International Review of Victimology, 15, 147–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Thomas, R. P., & Lawrence, A. (2018). Assessment of expert performance compared across professional domains. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 7, 167–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Truzzi, M. (1978). On the extraordinary: an attempt at clarification. Zetetic Scholar, 1, 11–19.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lawrence Patihis.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Patihis, L., Otgaar, H. & Merckelbach, H. Expert Witnesses, Dissociative Amnesia, and Extraordinary Remembering: Response to Brand et al.. Psychol. Inj. and Law 12, 281–285 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-019-09348-8

Download citation