Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Disability Evaluation for Accommodation on Licensing Exams Based on the ADA: Why Do Clinicians Fail to Adopt a Forensic Perspective?

  • Published:
Psychological Injury and Law Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The legal basis for receiving exam accommodation within postsecondary educational environments, on university entrance exams and licensing exams, is the ADA. Even when evaluations are conducted to recommend accommodation on licensing exams, where a clear forensic perspective should be the norm, this perspective is not routinely adopted. To explain why the gap between suggested and actual practice continues to be so wide, these types of accommodation-focused evaluations are contrasted with two other areas of forensic evaluation practice, competency to stand trial and worker’s compensation disability, for which a forensic perspective is the norm. Factors influencing the lack of forensic perspective adopted in accommodation-focused assessments include general problems with current clinical practice, the lack of a set of clearly defined forensic guidelines for performing these evaluations, the ongoing confusion regarding the standard for disability determination under the ADA, and the difficulty of obtaining evidence that would directly support the provision or denial of specific exam accommodations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AAPL Task Force on Forensic Assessment Guideline. (2015). AAPL practice guideline for the forensic assessment. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 43(2), S3–S53.

  • AMA Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. (2016). Code of medical ethics. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association. (2013). Specialty guidelines for forensic psychology. American Psychologist, 68, 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101–336, 104 Stat 329 (1990).

  • Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act, 42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq. (2008).

  • ADA National Network. ADA Overview: an overview of the Americans with disabilities act. https:/ada.org/factsheet/ADA-overview.

  • Burgoyne, R. A., & Mew, C. W. (2011). New regulations under titles II and III of the ADA: what has changed relative to the administration of licensing examinations? The Bar Examiner, 80, 642–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush, S. S., Ruff, R. M., Troster, A. I., Barth, J. T., Koffler, S. P., Pliskin, N. H., Reynolds, C. R., & Silver, C. H. (2005). Symptom validity assessment: practice issues and medical necessity. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20, 419–426.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Colker, R., Golden, C., Keiser, S., Mather, N. & Ofiesch, N. (2015). Final report of the “best practices panel”; Keiser, S, Minority Report; LSAT Consent Decree.

  • Dusky v. United States, 362 U.S. 402 (1960).

  • Everington, C. (1990). The competence assessment for standing trial for defendants with mental retardation (CAST*MR): a validation study. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 147–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, M. (2009). ADHD on trial: courtroom clashes over the meaning of “disability”. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, M., & Keiser, S. (1998). Accommodations in higher education under the Americans: a no-nonsense guide for clinicians, educations, administrators, and lawyers. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, M., Lewandowski, L., Murphy, K., & Dempsey, K. (2002). ADA-based accommodations in higher education: a survey of clinicians about documentation requirements and diagnostic standards. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 357–363.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, M., Lewandowski, L., & Keiser. (1999). The LD label for relatively well-functioning students: a critical analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 485–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949903200603.

  • Government Accountability Office. (2009). Higher education and disability: education needs a coordinated approach to improve its assistance to schools in supporting student, (Report to the Chairman, Committee on Education and Labor, House of Representatives, GAO-10-33. www.gao.gov/newitems/d1033.pdf.

  • Grisso, T. (2014). Competence to stand trial evaluations: just the basics. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grote, C. L., & Pyykkonen, B. A. (2012). Ethical practice of forensic neuropsychology. In G. J. Larrabee (Ed.), Forensic neuropsychology: a scientific approach. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, A. G. (2017). Clinical, ethical, and forensic implications of a flexible threshold for LD and ADHD in postsecondary settings. Psychological Injury and Law, 10(2), 138–150.

  • Harrison, A. G. (2006). Adults faking ADHD: you must be kidding! ADHD Report, 9, 402–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, A. G., & Armstrong, I. T. (2016). Development of a symptom validity index to assist in identifying ADHD symptom exaggeration or feigning. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 30, 265–283.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, A. G., & Edwards, M. J. (2010). Symptom exaggeration in post-secondary students: preliminary base rates in a Canadian sample. Applied Neuropsychology, 17, 135–143.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, A. G., Holmes, A., & Harrison, K. A. (2018). Medically confirmed functional impairment as proof of accommodation need in postsecondary education: are Ontario’s campuses the bellwether of an inequitable decision-making paradigm? The Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 187, 48–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, J. R., Bunford, N., Evans, S. W., & Owens, J. S. (2013). Educational accommodations for students with behavioral challenges: a systematic review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 83, 551–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, D., Petry, K., Evans, S. W., Noens, I., & Baeyens, D. (2018). The implementation of extended examination duration for students with ADHD in higher education. Journal of Attention Disorders, 22, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054718787879.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasinski, L. J., Harp, J. P., Berry, D. T. R., Shandera-Ochsner, L., Mason, L. H., & Ranseen, J. D. (2012). Using symptom validity tests to detect malingered ADHD in college students. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 25, 1415–1428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jasinski, L. J., & Ranseen, J. D. (2011). Malingered ADHD evaluations: a further complication for accommodation reviews. The Bar Examiner, 80, 6–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joy, J., Julius, R. J., Akter, R., & Baron, D. (2010). Assessment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) documentation from candidates requesting Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accommodations for the National Board of Osteopathic Medical Examiners COMLEX exam. Journal of Attention Disorders, 14, 104–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054710365056.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keiser, S. (1998). Test accommodations: an administrator’s view. In M. Gordon & S. Keiser (Eds.), Accommodations in higher education under the Americans: a no-nonsense guide for clinicians, educations, administrators, and lawyers. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keiser, S. (2015), Best practices panel: minority report. LSAT Consent Decree.

  • Larrabee, G. J. (2012). Assessment of malingering. In G. J. Larrabee (Ed.), Forensic neuropsychology: a scientific approach. New York: Oxford U. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewandowski, L. J., Cohen, J. A., & Lovett, B. J. (2013). Effects of extended time allotments on reading comprehension performance of college student with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 31, 326–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewandowski, L. J., & Lovett, B. J. (2014). The new diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, DSM-V: Implications for accommodation requests. The Bar Examiner, 83, 42–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindstrom, W., Nelson, J. M., & Foels, P. (2015). Postsecondary ADHD documentation requirements: common practices in the context of clinical issues, legal standards & empirical findings. Journal of Attention Disorders, 19, 655–665.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Love v. Law School Admission Coucil, Inc., 513 F Supp.2d 206 (E.D. Pa 2007).

  • Lovett, B. J., & Davis, K. M. (2017). Adult ADHD assessment: an integrated clinical-forensic perspective. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 48, 438–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovett, B. J. (2010). Extended time testing accommodations for students with disabilities: answers to five fundamental questions. Review of Educational Research, 80, 611–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovett, B. J. (2014). Testing accommodations under the amended Americans with disability act: the voice of empirical research. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 25, 81–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovett, B. J., & Lewandowski, L. J. (2015). Testing accommodations for students with disabilities: research-based practice. Washington D.C: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Medina v. California, 505 U.S. 437, 1992.

  • Melton, G. B., Petrila, J., Poythress, N. G., & Slobogin, C. (2007). Psychological evaluation for the courts: a handbook for mental health professionals and lawyers (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, L. A., Lewandowski, L. J., & Antshel, K. (2015). Effects of extended time for college students with and without attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Attention Disorders, 19, 678–686.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mittenberg, W., Patton, C., Canyock, E. M., & Condit, D. C. (2002). Base rates of malingering and symptom exaggeration. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 24, 1094–1102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, K., & Gordon, M. (1996). ADHD as a basis for test accommodations: a primer for clinicians. The ADHD Report, 5, 10–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, K., & Gordon, M. (2006). Assessment of adults with ADHD. In R. A. Barkley (Ed.), Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: a handbook for diagnosis and treatment (3rd ed., pp. 425–452). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, J. M., Whipple, B., Lindstrom, W., & Foels, P. A. (2014). How is ADHD assessed and documented? Examination of psychological reports submitted to determine eligibility for postsecondary disability. Journal of Attention Disorders, 18, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/108754714561860.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, R. A., & Norwood, S. (2000). The quality of forensic psychological assessments, reports and testimony: acknowledging the gap between promise and practice. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 9–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Otto, R. K., Musick, J. E., & Sherrod, C. (2011). Convergent validity of a screening measure designed to identify defendants feigning knowledge deficits related to competency to stand trial. Assessment, 18, 60–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pariseau, M. E., Pelham, W. E., Fabiano, G. A., Massetti, G. M., & Hart, K. C. (2010). Extended time on academic assignments: does increased time lead to improved performance for children with attention deficit/ hyperactivity disorder. School Psychology Quarterly, 25, 236–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeiffer, D. (1999). The problem of disability definition: again. Disability and Rehabilitation, 21, 392–395.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Price, Singleton, & Morris v. National Board of Medical Examiners, 966 F. Supp. 419 (S.D.W.V. 1997).

  • Ranseen, J. D. (1998). Lawyers with ADHD: the special test accommodation controversy. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 29, 450–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranseen, J. D. (2000). Reviewing ADHD accommodation requests: an update. The Bar Examiner, 69, 6–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranseen, J. D. (2016). Reviewing ADHD accommodation requests for the bar exam: what has and has not changed in 20 years. The Bar Examiner, 85, 10–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Section 504 Regulations, 34 C.F.R. & 104.1 et seq.

  • Reisine, S., & Fifield, J. (1992). Expanding the definition of disability: implications for planning, policy and research. Milbank Quarterly, 70, 491–508.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rodinelli, RD, (ed.). (2008). Guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment 6th Ed. USA, American Medical Association.

  • Searcy, C. A., Dowd, K. W., Hughes, M. G., Baldwin, S., & Pigg, T. (2015). Association of MCAT scores obtained with standard versus extra administration time with medical school admission, medical student performance and time to graduation. Journal of the American Medical Association, 313, 2253–2262. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama2015.5511.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sollman, M. J., Ranseen, J. D., & Berry, D. T. R. (2010). Detection of ADHD in college students. Psychological Assessment, 22, 325–335.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, B. K., May, K., & Galbally, L. (2007). Symptom exaggeration by college adults in attention-deficit hyperactivity and learning disorder evaluations. Applied Neuropsychology, 14, 189–207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Suhr, J. A., Buelow, M., & Riddle, T. (2011). Development of an infrequency index for the CAARS. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29, 160–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282910380190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc., 527 U.S. 491 (1990).

  • Toyota Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. Williams, 534 U.S. 184 (2002).

  • U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division, ADA Requirements, Testing Accommodations, www.ada.gov/regs2014/testing_accommodations.

  • Ustad, K., Rogers, R., Sewell, K., & Guarnaccia, C. (1996). Restoration of competency to stand trial: assessment with the Georgia court competency test and the competency screening test. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 131–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willingham, W., Ragosta, M., Bennett, R., Braun, H., Rock, D., & Powers, D. (1988). Testing handicapped people. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA

    John D. Ranseen & Timothy Allen

Authors
  1. John D. Ranseen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Timothy Allen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John D. Ranseen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Both authors currently work as consultants for multiple testing organizations reviewing documentation submitted on behalf of applicants requesting accommodation.

Informed Consent

This article involved no human experimentation or need for informed consent.

Animal Rights

No animal studies were carried out by the authors for this article.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ranseen, J.D., Allen, T. Disability Evaluation for Accommodation on Licensing Exams Based on the ADA: Why Do Clinicians Fail to Adopt a Forensic Perspective?. Psychol. Inj. and Law 12, 64–75 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-019-09342-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-019-09342-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation